ARMENIAN ELECTIONS - webinar and live blog

Live blog 0 updates

 

Webinair examines Armenian Election Results

On Thursday (11 June), LINKS Europe held a webinar on the results of the Armenian Parliamentary elections and the role of social media and media during the election period, both in Armenian media and Russian media. The panel was formed by Eleonora Sargsyan, from Armenian Progressive Youth; Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe; Santiago Ferbel-Azcarate, Senior Research Assistant at LINKS Europe; and Will Murray, founder of Vigeat Europa. The panel was chaired by Alexandra Dumirescu, international coordinator at LINKS Europe. Ms. Sargsyan offered the audience an overall assessment of the election results and the overall political mood in the country. She explained that the key outcome of Armenia's 2026 parliamentary elections was a renewed mandate for continuity. Dr Sammut described the 2026 parliamentary elections as a good election that strengthened Armenia's democratic process and produced a clear result. Yet he identified three issues that require serious attention. The webinar moved on to two presentations. Mr Ferbel-Azcarate shared a presentation titled 'Social media usage and Armenia's 2026 election'. This was followed by a presentation on how the Russian media discussed the Armenian elections by Will Murray from Vigeat Europa. 

read more

The webinar had two important two presentations:

Mr Ferbel-Azcarate shared a presentation titled 'Social media usage and Armenia's 2026 election'. 

 How the Russian media discussed the Armenian elections by Will Murray from Vigeat Europa. 

 

============================================================

Monday, 8 June 2026

============================================================

AND THEN THERE WERE THREE

Revised figures from the Armenian CEC has shown that the Prosperous Armenia party, has fallen short of the 4% threshold, and will therefore not be in the new Parliament. According to newly updates, Prosperous Armenia got 3.996 percent and is not passing the threshold. Thus Civil Contract will have 64 MPs, Strong Armenia alliance 29 MPs, and Armenia alliance 12 MPs

============================================================

FOUR PARTIES PASS THE THRESHOLD AND WILL BE REPRESENTED IN ARMENIAN  PARLIAMENT

The Armenian Central Elections Commission has completed the counting of ballots for the parliamentary elections. The results of all 2005 polling stations have been calculated.

The votes were distributed as follows:

In the lead is the Civil Contract party, which received 727,160 votes or 49.81 percent.

In second place is the "Strong Armenia" alliance of parties, which received exactly 23.29% (340,062 votes).

The third place is occupied by the "Armenia" alliance of parties, which has 9.94% (145,097 votes).

The Prosperous Armenia Party is in fourth place, garnering 4.00% (58,368 votes).

The "Wings of Unity" party, which occupies fifth place, currently has 2.30% (33,618 votes).

Accordingly, the minimum threshold is overcome by 4 political forces: the "Civil Agreement", the "Strong Armenia" alliance, the "Armenia" alliance, and the Prosperous Armenia Party.

============================================================

Nikol Pashinyan, and his Civil Contract Party, have won the parliamentary elections held in Armenia on 7 June. Preliminary results from the Armenian Central Elections Commission show Civic Contract with 50.83% of the votes.

As of now,  (0500 am local time) the results of 1,354 polling stations have been summarized, with 864,643 voters. The votes so far are as follows:

"Reformist Party" - 847 votes, 0.1 percent 

"I am against everyone" Democratic Party - 11,382 votes, 1.33 percent 

"Strong Armenia" alliance – 201,006 votes, 23.51 percent 

"Shonorable Party of Armenia" – 15,986 votes, 1.87 percent 

"New Force" reformist party – 13,109 votes, 1.53 percent 

"Wings of Unity" Party – 19,270 votes, 2.25 percent 

Prosperous Armenia Party – 35,074 votes, 4.10 percent 

"National Democratic Pole" Pan-Armenian Party – 2,997 votes, 0.35 percent 

"Kocharian National Revival and National Awakening Party" – 1,093 votes, 0.13 percent 

"Armenian National Congress" party – 1,759 votes, 0.21 percent 

"Republic" Party – 8 thousand 666 votes, 1.01 percent 

"Christian Democratic Party" – 1,484 votes, 0.17 percent 

Democratic Unity Party – 2,951 votes, 0.35 percent

 "Democracy, Law, Discipline" Party – 15,483 votes, 1.81 percent 

"Civil Contract" Party – 434,562 votes, 50.83 percent 

"Armenia" bloc – 80 thousand 937 votes, 9.47 percent 

"Alliance for the Defense of Democracy for the Republic" party – 3,973 votes, 0.46 percent 

"Bright Armenia" Party – 4,060 votes, 0.47 percent. 

============================================================

Sunday, 7 JUNE 2026

============================================================

VOTING CLOSES IN ARMENIA'S PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS - VOTER TURNOUT IS 58.97%

Voting has closed in Armenia's Parliamentary Elections. Voter turnout was 58.97%, an increase of nearly 10% compared to the last elections. In the parliamentary elections that concluded in Armenia, 1,476,597 voters, or 58.97% of citizens with the right to vote, out of 2 million 503 thousand 976 citizens with the right to vote, participated in the vote. Results are expected overnight

18 political forces are competing for seats in the 9th convocation of the National Assembly of Armenia: 16 parties and 2 blocs. The threshold for passing into parliament for parties is set at 4%, and for blocs at 8%. It is noteworthy that when calculating the final election results, invalid and intentionally spoiled ballots are simply omitted and not taken into account. The percentages received by parties are determined solely on the basis of the total number of valid ballots.

============================================================

Voting in Armenia is currently around 10% up on previous elections

As of 5:00 p.m., the turnout in the regular parliamentary elections was 48.92 percent: 1 million 224 thousand 957 voters took part in the vote. This was stated by CEC member Zhirayr Karapetyan at the information center of the Central Electoral Commission

During the snap elections to the National Assembly held in December 2021, turnout was 38.52 percent as of 5 p.m.

As of 5 pm,.15% of voters (412,168 voters) : of voters (412,168 voters) had voted in Yerevan, 42.67% (46,216) in Armenia's second city, Gyumri, and 47.9% (44,928) in the third city, Vanadzor.

Below are the results of voting participation in the regions:

Aragatsotn region – 57,999 voters (51.13 percent)

Ararat Region – 106,622 voters (48.43 percent)

Armavir region – 101,408 voters (44.8 percent)

Gegharkunik region – 83,348 voters (46.86 voters)

Lori region – 106,161 voters (49.77 percent)

Kotayk region – 122,692 voters (51.01 percent)

Shirak region – 96,077 voters (46.23 percent)

Syunik region – 59,215 voters (55.36 percent)

Vayots Dzor region – 24,171 voters (54.15 percent)

Tavush region – 55,096 voters (53.27 percent)

============================================================

Voter turnout in Armenia is 33.84% by 1400 local time

As of 14:00, the turnout in the parliamentary elections in Armenia was 33.84 percent; 847,226 voters participated in the voting. This was stated by the Central Electoral Commission (CEC), at the CEC information Center. This is higher than during the snap parliamentary elections held in June 2021 when the turnout as of 14:00 was 26.82 percent.

============================================================

Voter turnout 14.48 % at 1100 am local time

As of 11:00 a.m., voter turnout in the parliamentary elections held in Armenia on June 7 was 14.48%, with 362,657 citizens voting, Anna Grigoryan, a representative of the Central Election Commission of Armenia, reported at a press conference in Yerevan.

“As of 11:00, 362,657 citizens have voted in the elections in Armenia,” she said.

============================================================

Kocharyan also voted

Former Armenian President and prime ministerial candidate from the Armenia bloc, Robert Kocharyan, also voted in the parliamentary elections. He arrived at the polling station with his wife, Bella Kocharyan. Kocharyan told reporters that "radical changes" would occur in Armenia if he came to power.

============================================================

Leader of the opposition "Strong Armenia" party, Samvel Karapetyan, who is under house arrest, voted in the elections.

According to Armenian media reports, Karapetyan arrived at the polling station in Yerevan accompanied by his wife, daughter, and law enforcement officers. "I voted for the sake of forming a legitimate government," Karapetyan told reporters.

Karapetyan believes his party will win the elections, after which Armenia, in his words, will pursue a "balanced international policy": "We must have good relations with everyone—Russia, the US, and the EU. These are the countries that should help Armenia develop. There will definitely be a balance in relations."

He also said he had no plans to return to Russia: "I'll stay in Armenia for another 10 years. I'll work here. There's plenty of work."

Gagik Tsarukyan, chairman of the Prosperous Armenia Party, also voted in the elections. He cast his ballot at a polling station in the Kotayk region.

============================================================

Armenian Prime Minister and Civil Contract leader Nikol Pashinyan voted in the parliamentary elections in Armenia

Pashinyan visited polling station 8/20 in Yerevan's Shengavit district.

After the vote, Pashinyan told reporters that relations with Russia are based on mutual respect and that the tension is "artificial": "Certain forces operating in Armenia are trying to sow tension in relations between Russia and Armenia. But we have a close relationship with the Russian president."

The prime minister noted that after the elections, he intends to travel to Moscow, Washington, and Brussels. "I will go to Moscow, Washington, and Brussels. I have already said that I hope to have the opportunity to participate in the European Political Community summit in Baku. We intend to fully develop our international relations," Pashinyan said

============================================================

Saturday, 6 JUNE 2026

============================================================

OSCE PA Mission to observe Sunday's election in Armenia

A delegation from the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly is in Yerevan to observe Sunday's election. The mission is led by the Special Co-ordinator and leader of the short-term OSCE observer mission, Farah Karimi (Netherlands), and the Head of the OSCE PA delegation of observers, Jevrosima Pejović (Montenegro) 

Image removed.============================================================

Armenian CEC sanctions prosecution of six "Strong Armenia "candidates accused of vote buying

The Central Electoral Commission (CEC) of Armenia has authorized the Prosecutor General's Office to initiate criminal prosecution against six parliamentary candidates from the opposition "Strong Armenia" alliance led by Samvel Karapetyan.

​The Investigative Committee reports that a decision has been made to detain these individuals

============================================================

Who is who in Armenia's Parliamentary Elections - a list prepared by civilnet 

The American ngo civil net published a comprehensive list of Who is Who in Armenia's parliamentary election. You can see it here.

============================================================

CEC Rejects  call to invalidate registration of Samvel Karapetyan's "'Strong Armenia" bloc.

At a meeting on Friday evening, (5 June), Armenia's Central Electoral Commission rejected the Republic Party's application to invalidate the registration of the Strong Armenia party bloc's electoral list, led by Samvel Karapetian.

"Aram Sargsyan's appeal to deregister Samvel Karapetyan's 'Strong Armenia' bloc is rejected. The decision comes into force upon publication at the meeting," a CEC statement reads.

The appeal was rejected unanimously by all seven commission members. Central Election Commission Chairman Vahagn Hovakimyan stated that the arguments and allegations presented lacked sufficient substantiation and were purely speculative.

============================================================

Simonyan meets CIS Parliamentary Assembly election observation mission

On June 5, Speaker of the National Assembly of Armenia Alen Simonyan received the delegation of the CIS Inter-Parliamentary Assembly observation mission, led by Deputy Chairman of the Senate of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan Zhakip Asanov.

Astatement released by the Armenian National Assembly states that Alen Simonyan welcomed the representatives of the observation mission, wishing them successful observation activities in the upcoming parliamentary elections.

The two sides also discussed other issues related to the pre-election campaign and electoral processes.

============================================================

5 June 2026, Armenia goes to the polls, searching for a way forward

"This commentary was prepared by Mr Narek Sukiasyan for the 11th issue of the Armenia Election Monitor 2026 newsletter.

On June 7, Armenians will head to the polls for the first time in almost a decade to vote in a regular, not snap, Parliamentary election. The stakes could not be higher. If victorious, the incumbent Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan will become the longest-serving head of government in Armenia’s independent history, provided he serves the full 5-year term.

Standing in his way is a fragmented but determined opposition, led since half a year ago by Samvel Karapetyan and his Strong Armenia party. While reliable polls indicate that the opposition remains at a significant distance from outright victory, their best bet lies in the post-election coalition of several opposition parties. This is often referred to as the "Gyumri-2" scenario— mimicking the successful manoeuvre pulled off in the second-largest city last year, where the coming together of the opposition forces overtook Civil Contract, which failed to secure a majority. This outcome, however, is far from guaranteed on June 7."

3 June 2026, A strategic choice: Armenian voters between diversification and dependency

"This commentary was prepared by Ms. Varduhi Harutyunyan for the 10th issue of the Armenia Election Monitor 2026 newsletter.

Exactly one month before the parliamentary elections in Armenia, Yerevan was transformed into the center of Europe, hosting the 8th European Political Community Summit, parallel to which the inaugural Armenia-European Union Summit and the state visit of French President Emmanuel Macron were also held. Such developments in Armenia-EU relations became possible after the National Assembly of Armenia adopted a law on March 26, 2025, initiating the process of Armenia's accession to the EU. Yerevan and Brussels are also engaged in an active dialogue on visa liberalization. Cooperation in the fields of security and defence is deepening, and the EU has also expressed support for Armenia's agenda on regional unblocking and the diversification of economic relations.

Just days before the elections, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also arrived in Armenia for a brief visit. The Secretary's visit was marked by the signing of three crucial documents. Through one of them, Armenia-US relations were effectively elevated to yet another level, reaching a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. Additionally, the framework agreement on the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) was initialed, along with a framework memorandum on critical minerals and rare earths. Undoubtedly, Armenian-American relations are developing and deepening at an unprecedented pace. Specifically, the Republic of Armenia and the US transitioned from a strategic dialogue to a strategic partnership on January 14, 2025. It is noteworthy that while this initial document was signed under the US Democratic administration, the Republicans, led by Donald Trump, contrary to the assertions of many, did not ignore this partnership. Instead, they elevated it to a new level with lightning speed and infused it with strategic depth, demonstrating their consistency and active interest in Armenia, as well as in peace and stability in the South Caucasus."

3 June 2026, Kars meeting brings together business people from Armenia and Turkiy

"Turkish and Armenian entrepreneurs met in the Turkish city of Kars to discuss potential joint projects, new investments, and areas of economic cooperation. The meeting was organised  by the Kars Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Kars Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası).

During the talks, a wide range of areas were discussed, including trade, logistics, transport infrastructure, tourism, agriculture, industrial production, energy, and services. Particular attention was paid to expanding transport connectivity and simplifying logistics routes between the countries and through the South Caucasus region.

Following the official part, the program continued in a closed format of B2B meetings, where business representatives from both countries discussed potential investment projects and possible areas of cooperation in areas such as the food industry, textiles, construction, tourism, and technology."

1 June, Monday Commentary: Putin must not be allowed to turn Armenia into his next irresponsible adventure

Monday Commentary written by Dennis Sammut, published on commonspace.eu on 1 June 2026

"It is important to state clearly, and at the outset, that it is up to the Armenian to make this choice. Outsiders should not interfere. The next Armenian government will have important choices to make, at both the domestic and international level, and it must have the clear mandate, and the legitimacy of a popular vote, to deliver these choices.

But it seems that this does not fit the needs of Putin’s Russia. Over the last days Russia has openly interfered in Armenian politics, using the leverages it accumulated over the years. Putin has made it clear that he will not tolerate an independent minded Armenian government. Armenia was since its independence in 1991, a compliant “partner” of Russia, and fitted into Vladimir Putin’s grand strategy of surrounding Russia with countries, that whilst nominally independent, depended on Russia for their defence, economy, foreign policy, and indeed for their survival. Any attempts at independent thinking or action was to be crushed. Look what happened to Ukraine. Armenia was told bluntly that the same could happen to it."

31 May, Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

"Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations.

The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia, S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU."

30 May, The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union

"The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June."

29 May, Upcoming elections in Armenia: why is it important? - a view from Azerbaijan

"This commentary was prepared by Mr Ahmad Alili for the ninth issue of the Armenia Election Monitor 2026 newsletter.

The upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia are no longer being discussed only within Armenia itself. Today, the Armenian vote is being closely watched in Azerbaijan, Russia, Türkiye, across Europe, and in the United States. This is not simply another domestic electoral cycle in a small South Caucasus country. It is an event capable of influencing the future geopolitical architecture of the entire region. At the same time, its significance should neither be exaggerated nor underestimated.

For the first time in Armenia’s modern political history, an incumbent leader is approaching elections with an agenda centred on peace and normalisation rather than conflict management or historical mobilisation. This distinction is important. The 2021 elections were not about peace. In the aftermath of the 2020 Karabakh war, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was effectively seeking a mandate connected to the preservation of the Karabakh issue and to a broader post-war political framework shaped by remedial secession narratives. The current political moment is fundamentally different.

What is now emerging is a debate not only about political leadership, but about Armenia’s entire geopolitical worldview and strategic self-perception."

28 May, Russia bans produce imports from Armenia

"Russia will suspend imports of fresh fruits, vegetables and herbs from Armenia, Russia’s agricultural safety watchdog said on Thursday (28 May). 

“Rosselkhoznadzor is introducing temporary restrictions starting May 30, 2026, on the import of fresh tomatoes, cucumbers, peppers, fresh herbs and strawberries originating in or shipped from Armenia,” the agency said in a statement.

The move is likely political in nature, ahead of the 7 June parliamentary elections in Armenia, even though Rosselkhoznadzor cited safety concerns. "

 

28 May, Trump endorses Pashinyan for re-election

"In a classic Truth Social post today (28 May), United States President Donald Trump expressed his full support for Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who is running for re-election in one of Armenia’s most important elections. Many analysts in Armenia and outside the country argue that these elections are crucial and will determine the direction of the country."

27 May, Russia warns Armenia: Choose EU and lose favourable energy terms

"Russia has warned Armenia that it may suspend or terminate a bilateral agreement governing natural gas, petroleum products, and uncut diamonds if Armenia continues to deepen ties with the European Union. The 2013 agreement outlines terms under which Russia indefinitely eliminated export duties on shipments of petroleum products, natural gas, and diamonds to Armenia.

On Monday (25 May), Russian Energy Minister Sergei Tsivilev issued a threat to Armenia’s Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure, the Russian business daily Kommersant reported, citing a copy of the letter it reviewed."

27 May, Armenia at a crossroads: Elections, peace, and the limits of international guarantees

"This commentary was prepared by Mr Narek Minasyan for the 8th issue of the Armenia Election Monitor 2026 newsletter.

Less than a week remains until Armenia’s parliamentary elections. The campaign is in full swing, political forces are attacking one another in increasingly harsh terms, investigations into hybrid attacks against Armenia appear almost daily, and statements interfering in Armenia’s internal affairs continue to come from Moscow.

The June 7 elections are arguably the most geopolitically significant in Armenia’s modern history. Their outcome will shape the country’s trajectory for years. Campaign narratives suggest that Armenian voters will effectively answer several strategic questions: whether to continue normalization with Azerbaijan and Turkey or revise existing understandings; whether to deepen ties with the EU or strengthen dependence on Russia; whether to continue democratic reforms or return figures associated with the previous political system.

According to an IRI survey conducted in mid-May, Armenians’ top concerns are national security and border issues, the economy and unemployment, and peace. Unsurprisingly, the Armenia–Azerbaijan normalization process has become the central issue of the campaign. Against this backdrop, political and expert circles are again debating the idea of “guaranteed peace” and international security guarantees."

27 May, Rubio voices support for Pashinyan ahead of 7 June elections

"US Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed support for Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan during a brief refuelling stopover at Yerevan's Zvartnots airport on Tuesday (26 May), less than two weeks before the parliamentary elections on 7 June. 

During the stop, Rubio met with Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan. Speaking next to Mirzoyan, Rubio said: “Both yourself and the prime minister and your entire team here in Armenia are blazing the trail towards a brighter and more independent future for Armenia.”

Rubio added: "I am very happy to be here to show my support for their courage, my support for their vision, my support for their dedication, my support for their willingness to see for the future of their country and what it takes to get there.”"

22 May, The upcoming Armenian election will decide the future direction of the country

"This commentary was prepared by Mr Anri Stepanyan for the seventh issue of the Armenia Election Monitor 2026.

The upcoming elections that the Republic of Armenia will be facing next month will likely be one of the most decisive political moments for the country in the past decade. Ever since the Velvet Revolution in 2018, the country has undergone numerous internal and external processes that have significantly impacted its stance in the region, in the international arena, and the lives of its citizens. Much of this has been due to the change of regime in 2018, from the old-fashioned conservatives to the current ruling party and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who are commonly framed as “pro-Western”. The importance of the upcoming elections lies in the fundamentally different approaches of these two sides regarding the direction in which they want to steer Armenia."

20 May, Beyond the ballot: Elections as a test of public reason and political consciousness

"This commentary was prepared by Ms Aghavni Harutyunyan for the Armenia Election Monitor 2026 newsletter. The full issue can be checked here.

When we speak about Armenia’s upcoming parliamentary elections, public attention naturally turns to the visible political outcome: who will win, which parties or alliances will cross the threshold, how the balance between the ruling party and the opposition may shift, and how the next political cycle will be shaped. These are legitimate questions.

Elections are the constitutional mechanism through which power is formed, renewed, challenged, or transferred.

Yet elections are never only about the final result. In a democratic society, they are also a process through which the condition of political culture, public debate, and informational resilience becomes visible. In Armenia’s case, this broader dimension is especially important. The campaign unfolds in a society shaped by security uncertainty, post-war trauma, contested perceptions of peace, concerns over sovereignty, external influence, institutional distrust, and social fatigue.

For this reason, Armenia’s elections should be examined not only through the ballot box, but also through the public and informational environment in which citizens’ choices are being formed. A democratic election is not complete merely because citizens are formally able to vote. It is complete when, before voting, citizens can orient themselves in an environment of facts, substantiated arguments, political programs, responsible commentary, and public accountability."

15 May, Armenia’s 2026 vote: A referendum on peace and sovereignty?

Commentary for Armenia Election Monitor 2026, by ELEONORA SARGSYAN, published on 15 May 2026

"On 7 June 2026, Armenians will go to the polls in parliamentary elections that are formally domestic, but politically much larger than that. Nineteen political forces – seventeen parties and two alliances – are competing in the race. Yet the real contest is not only between parties. The 2026 elections are not only a domestic contest over power, but a referendum-like moment on Armenia’s geopolitical orientation, peace agenda, and democratic resilience.

At the heart of this election are three larger questions: whether a post-war society can resist the political instrumentalization of fear; whether a small state can reclaim agency after years of strategic dependence; and whether, after repeated rupture and loss, Armenia can still define its future beyond trauma. In this sense, the election is not only about who governs Armenia next. It is about the political direction through which Armenia will try to govern itself after war, displacement, and the collapse of old security assumptions."

13 May, As Armenia’s election campaign starts, parties compete over rival visions for the country’s future

"The campaign for the Armenian parliamentary elections began on Friday (8 May), with 17 parties and two electoral blocs in the running. All are seeking to enter parliament and win the support of around 2.5 million eligible voters across Armenia. With the campaign underway, each party is already mobilising public opinion against the other. Parties are divided on different themes: peace vs reconsideration of the current peace process, European vs Russian trajectories, and populist vs democratic tendencies, among other political cleavages shaping the campaign. Each party is targeting different segments of the Armenian electorate and hoping that its strategy will secure seats in parliament."

11 May, Monday Commentary: Europe goes to the Caucasus, but that is just the beginning of the story

Monday Commentary written by Dennis Sammut, published on commonspace.eu on 11 May 2026

"Dozens of European presidents, prime ministers, and other senior leaders descended on Yerevan last week to participate in the 8th Summit of the European Political Community (EPC). For a day or two, you could not go anywhere in the centre of the Armenian capital without bumping into a European leader and his entourage.

The summit itself was by and large uneventful, with seven-minute set-piece speeches, during which leaders heaped praise on Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. This followed the traditional welcome, whereby leaders were greeted individually by Pashinyan, which lasted for hours. There was an unusually long “red carpet’. NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte sprinted the last part of his walk, remarking that this was the “longest red carpet ever”. But otherwise, the Summit was uneventful. There was speculation about the Azerbaijani participation in the Summit. In the end, President Ilham Aliyev addressed the summit online. It would have been nice if he were present in person, but clearly, not possible yet, and an online presence was the next best thing.

11 May, Azerbaijan stand-off with the European Parliament

"On 30 April, the European Parliament issued a resolution titled “Supporting democratic resilience in Armenia”. The resolution focused primarily on Armenia's upcoming elections on 7 June (EP resolution on 30 April).

However, the resolution also criticised Baku over the treatment of Armenian detainees, the rights of displaced ethnic Armenians, and the protection of Armenian cultural and religious heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In response on 1 May, the Azerbaijan foreign ministry summoned the EU Ambassador, and the Azerbaijan Parliament cut institutional co-operation with the European Parliament, and its involvement with Euronest."

8 May, A serious election, in which voters have clear options

Commentary for Armenia Election Monitor 2026, by STEPAN GRIGORYAN, published on 8 May 2026

"The registration process for parties and blocs participating in the elections has been completed. A total of 19 political forces—two blocs and 17 parties—will participate in the election race, which begins on May 8 and concludes on June 5. The electoral threshold is set at 4% for parties and 8% for blocs.

Although the official campaign starts on May 8 according to electoral law, many parties de facto launched their campaigns long ago, at least since January of this year.

Key Contenders:

The following forces have a realistic chance of entering the National Assembly of Armenia:

  • "Civil Contract" Party: Led by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.
  • "Strong Armenia" Party: Led by Samvel Karapetyan, an oligarch based in Russia.
  • "Armenia" Bloc: Led by former President Robert Kocharyan.
  • "Prosperous Armenia" Party: Led by Gagik Tsarukyan, an oligarch and close friend of Alexander Lukashenko.

It appears that administrative resources and financial capabilities grant these forces a significant advantage. Furthermore, the primary political struggle is unfolding between Nikol Pashinyan on one side and three pro-Russian forces—those of Karapetyan, Kocharyan, and Tsarukyan—on the other. Effectively, a bipolar model has emerged in Armenian domestic politics."

7 May, LINKS Europe panel discussion - 'Armenia between a historic summit and a crucial election'

WEBINAIR held on 7 May 2026

"On 6 May 2026, LINKS Europe Foundation hosted an online webinar titled “Armenia between a historic summit and a crucial election.” The event was chaired by Alexandra Dumitrescu, International Coordinator at LINKS Europe, and brought together experts from Yerevan and Brussels to discuss Armenia’s evolving election environment and broader geopolitical developments.

The panel featured Johnny Melikyan, Senior Fellow at the Orbeli Center; Narek Minasyan, Associate Expert at the Armenian Council Research Center; and Amanda Paul, Deputy Head of the Europe in the World Programme and Senior Policy Analyst at the European Policy Centre in Brussels."

6 May, Armenia’s parliamentary elections: Polarisation and hybrid threats

Commentary for Armenia Election Monitor 2026, by  ANDEZEJ KLIMCZYK, published on 6 May 2026

"The upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia will undoubtedly be crucial for the country’s future. We can already observe significant social polarisation, the use of hate speech, and brutal media attacks by competing electoral entities on each other. Unlike Georgia or Moldova, Armenia is operating under intense and immediate security pressure following the end of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Border issues, normalisation of relations with Azerbaijan, and relations with Türkiye are not just foreign policy issues; they are existential political issues. This raises the stakes of the election and increases the likelihood of hardline rhetoric that could complicate post-election management.

Armenia continues to hold genuinely competitive, free elections. Compared to countries such as Russia, this remains an important strength. The main problem is not the lack of competition, but the quality of it.  Currently, politics is highly polarised and often based on support for or opposition to Nikol Pashinyan. This risks narrowing the political debate and turning elections into referendums on leadership rather than on future-oriented programmes.

There are real threats and risks of disinformation or hybrid interference in these elections."

5 May, Armenia and EU agree on strategic co-operation, but the 7 June elections will define the future

Report from the EU-Armenia Summit in Yerevan, from commonspace.eu special correspondent Alex Verge

"In a landmark diplomatic moment, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan hosted the first-ever bilateral summit between Armenia and the European Union at the presidential residence in Yerevan on 5 May. While it did not deliver any major announcements, the summit reflected the ongoing deepening of the bilateral  relation and a show of support from Europe for Pashinyan, who is seeking re-election in parliamentary elections in June."

4 May, EPC summit in Armenia was an expression of European support for Nikol Pashinyan

Report from the EPC Summit in Yerevan, from commonspace.eu special correspondent Alex Verge

"Leaders from more than 45 European countries and beyond gathered today in Yerevan for the eighth summit of the European Political Community (EPC). The summit was the largest gathering of European leaders ever held in the South Caucasus. Apart from the set piece events in plenary session, many leaders also held private bilateral meetings. commonspace.eu special correspondent, Alex Verge, was at the summit, from where he filed this report:

European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, France President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky were amongst the myriad of European leaders that gathered on Monday for 8th summit of the European Political Community. Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney was also present, making him the first non-European leader to take part in an EPC summit."

3 May, The European Parliament dips into the South Caucasus; Azerbaijan is not amused and cuts relations

"In support of the incumbent rule of PM Pashinyan, the EU has intensified its support to Armenia, particularly since the Strategic Agenda for the EU-Armenia Partnership was set in December 2025 to May 2026. On 29 January, the EU adopted the second assistance measure to Armenia within the framework of the European Peace Facility, doubling the total amount to 20 million EURO from the first assistance measure provided in July 2024. The next day the EU extended the European Union Mission in Armenia – an unarmed civilian monitoring mission deployed on the Armenian side of the Armenia–Azerbaijan border since January 2023 (continuing the EUMCAP established in October 2022) – for two more years, until 19 February 2027, with a budget of over €44 million. In March, the sides inked the financing agreement for the remaining amount (140 million EURO) from of the €270 million Resilience and Growth Plan for Armenia the EU adopted in April 2024. On 16–17 March 2026, Kaja Kallas announced that, following Armenia’s request, the EU would deploy a Hybrid Rapid Response Team to Armenia to help counter threats ahead of the elections, explicitly framing this as support against foreign interference. Separately, EU ambassadors reportedly approved in mid-April a new civilian mission to Armenia focused on hybrid threats, with later political endorsement expected by EU foreign ministers. The next summit of the European Political Summit is planned to be held in Yerevan on 4 May, followed by the first EU-Armenia on the next day."

1 May, Opinion: Armenian June 2026 parliamentary elections: a test for national stability, regional peace and Russian influence in the South Caucasus

Commentary for Armenia Election Monitor 2026, by ALEX VERGE, published on 1 May 2026

"When Armenians vote in parliamentary elections on 7 June, it will have been almost ten years since elections were last held on schedule. In the decade since the last regular parliamentary elections in 2017, the country has experienced a period of significant political upheaval and conflict. The 2018 Velvet Revolution forced out an entrenched political elite and set the country on a path of institutional and political reform. The conflict with Azerbaijan over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh in turn came to a decisive end, with Armenia suffering military defeat in 2020 and an Azerbaijani offensive in 2023 leading to the displacement of almost all of the local Armenian population - approximately 100,000 people - and the end of the Republic of Artsakh as a breakaway state.

The key national political figure over the course of this decade has been the current Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinyan, who is seeking re-election as the leader of the Civil Contract party. Then, a leading figure of the opposition, Pashinyan, first came to power during the 2018 revolution. He subsequently won snap elections in 2018 and 2021, with the latter held in response to the 2020 War and the last election in Armenia to date."

1 May, Background information on the 7 June Parliamentary Elections in Armenia

"The Armenian Parliamentary Elections will be held on Sunday, 7 June 2026. Citizens who maintain a permanent residence in Armenia and are at least 18 years old can vote. These elections will be the first regularly scheduled national elections since 2017, following two snap elections held in 2018 and 2021 that were triggered by constitutional crises. In these parliamentary elections, the revised thresholds for entering the government are:

  • 4% for single parties
  • 8% for alliances of two parties
  • 9% for three and 10% for alliances of more parties.

Alongside these rules, up to four seats in parliament are reserved for national minorities to ensure their representation (one for each of the four largest national minorities, Yezidis, Russians, Assyrians, and Kurds). There is also no minimum turnout required for parliamentary elections to be considered valid. This means that regardless of how many people vote, the results of the election will still stand."

30 April, Armenia’s Russia debate deepens ahead of 2026 elections

"For decades, Russia was Armenia’s main security and economic partner. But cooperation has weakened in recent years, with Armenia freezing participation in the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) alliance, Russian border guards withdrawing from some locations, and Yerevan expanding ties with the European Union and the United States.

A major point of dispute is Armenia’s railway system, operated by a Russian company under a concession agreement signed in 2008. In a press statement on 13 February, Pashinyan said Armenia could consider bringing in a third-country operator if Russia cannot modernise or restore key sections of the network. Russian officials reacted sharply: Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu reportedly called the idea “ill-conceived,” while Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova described it as “bizarre and unacceptable.”"\

30 April, Thursday Interview: Dr. Andrzej Klimczyk

Thursday Interview on commonspace.eu with Andrzej Klimczyk on 30 April 2026

"The Armenian parliamentary elections on 7 June are crucial in more ways than one. A fragile peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan is still at stake. While progress has been made since President Trump’s August 2025 meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, where a peace agreement was initialled, much remains uncertain. Key elements of the settlement are yet to be finalised, and the political will required to sustain momentum will depend heavily on the outcome of the vote. The peace agenda is heavily politicised, adding further sensitivity to the process, as conduits for Kremlin policy continue to disseminate fear and uncertainty within Armenian society regarding the ongoing peace process with Azerbaijan.

In this week’s Thursday Interview, former Polish diplomat Dr. Andrzej Klimczyk draws on decades of experience across the post-Soviet space to reflect on Armenia’s upcoming parliamentary elections and the wider dynamics in the South Caucasus. He argues that while the European Union has the potential to play a stronger geopolitical role in the region, its approach remains too bureaucratic and insufficiently attuned to local realities."

Armenian Election Monitor 2026:

The 'Armenia Election Monitor 2026' will publish, twice a week, between 1 May and 15 June 2026, an analysis of events and developments around the 2026 Armenia Parliamentary elections. The nonpartisan and independent newsletter will monitor developments and present experts' opinions to help provide an understanding of events and statements. The goal of the newsletter is to enhance democratic principles through fact-based, informed opinions.

The 12 newsletters will be produced by LINKS Europe Foundation, in collaboration with local partners. The issues will be sent to our Caucasus Concise Newsletter subscribers and added to our website here:

Issue 1: 1 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor 

Issue 2: 6 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - The needs of the Armenian people must be centre-stage in the 7 June parliamentary elections

Issue 3: 8 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - Europeans rally around Pashinyan, but the Russians are not amused

Issue 4: 13 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - As Armenia’s election campaign starts, parties compete over rival visions for the country’s future

Issue 5: 15 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - Armenia’s 2026 vote: A referendum on peace and sovereignty?

Issue 6: 20 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - The role of electoral observer missions in Armenia ahead of the parliamentary elections

Issue 7: 22 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - The upcoming Armenian election will decide the future direction of the country

Issue 8: 27 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - Armenia at a crossroads: Elections, peace, and the limits of international guarantees

Issue 9: 29 May 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - Upcoming elections in Armenia: why is it important? - a view from Azerbaijan

Issue 10: 3 June 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - A strategic choice: Armenian voters between diversification and dependency  

Issue 11: 5 June 2026 - Armenia Election Monitor - Armenia goes to the polls, searching for a way forward

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council Presidential Statement on the Role of Diplomacy during Active Hostilities

UN Security Council Presidential Statement on the Role of Diplomacy during Active Hostilities

The United Nations Security Council is today expected to adopt a presidential statement on the role of diplomacy during active hostilities. The draft text, which was authored by Pakistan, underscores the importance of maintaining diplomatic engagement even after the outbreak of armed conflict, with a view to containing escalation, facilitating cessations of hostilities and ceasefires, and creating conditions conducive to peaceful political settlements. Resolution 2788 of 22 July 2025, which was initiated by Pakistan, reaffirmed the Council’s commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes under Chapter VI of the UN Charter. A year later, on 23 July, the Council convened an open debate to review the resolution’s implementation and examine ways of making more effective use of the peaceful dispute settlement tools available under Chapter VI.   The draft presidential statement builds on previous Council products, such as resolution 2788, but it is the first to focus specifically on the role of diplomacy in containing and de-escalating active hostilities. Since the open debate in July, Council members have continued to call for intensified efforts towards de-escalation and dialogue, although differences persist over how proactively the Council should promote mediation and other peaceful means of dispute settlement, particularly in situations where the consent of the parties is contested. In his statement opening the general debate of the 81st session of the General Assembly on 22 September, Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted the devastating consequences of ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, Sudan, and the Middle East, warning that these and other crises illustrate what happens when “force outpaces diplomacy” and stressing the urgency of sustained diplomatic engagement. The negotiations on the draft presidential statement do not appear to have been particularly contentious, although Council members expressed differing views on some elements of the text. Pakistan circulated the initial draft to Council members on 14 October. Following informal consultations with Council members to address comments on the initial draft, Pakistan circulated a first revised draft on 23 October, incorporating several proposed amendments. On 29 October, Pakistan circulated a second revised draft, which it placed under silence procedure until the following day (30 October). After the US broke silence, a third revised draft was circulated on 3 November and placed under silence procedure until this morning (4 November). The draft subsequently passed silence. The agreed presidential statement emphasises the importance of maintaining direct and indirect channels of communication between parties to armed conflict to reduce the risk of miscalculation and create opportunities for sustained political engagement. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)