Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilization  of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated in the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966.

The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”,  it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” 

As the Anatolian lament goes like this:

There are no clouds in the sky, what is this smoke?

There is no death in the neighborhood, what is this cry?

These lands of Yemen are so ruthless.

Oh, it is Yemen, its rose is but a meadow.”

The Ottomans were unceremoniously expelled from Yemen in 1918. The British, despite their bravado, were expelled even more unceremoniously from Aden in 1967.

Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult.

These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history.

Since its founding in 1932, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has had to deal with its poor, populous, and unruly neighbour: Yemen. It has done so through force – sometimes, and not very successfully, but more often through “traditional” diplomacy – ie bribes and gifts.

In 2016, the new Saudi strongman, Mohammed bin Salman, tried to solve the problem by force again, after the Houthi Movement, broke out from its stronghold in the North and swept over most of Yemen, including the capital Sanaa, toppling the legitimate government. He failed, and an uneasy truce left the problem unresolved. Now the Houthis emboldened by events in the Gulf, and the new assertiveness of their friends in Tehra, have decided to teach the Saudis a lesson. They attacked Saudi targets, including near the capital Riyadh; they closed the Bab el Mandeb Strait to Saudi shipping, and they overwhelmed the forces of the pro Saudi Yemeni government, occupying the city of Mocha, the Island of Pemba, and other strategic points on the Red Sea.

The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. They cannot do it on their own. They have been building a coalition – including the Pakistani and Turks, co-signatories with Saudi Arabia of the recent Mecca Defence Pact. Others are said to be involved too, including the Egyptian, the Sudanese, ..... and the British. The Americans apparently declined to be involved overtly, although they are likely to provide intelligence and logistical support.

This is likely to be a long and messy conflict.

Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d)  the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it.

In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either.

Dr Dennis Sammut is the Director of LINKS Europe Foundation, and Managing Editor of commmonspace.eu. He has visited Yemen regularly since 1980. His doctoral thesis at Oxford University focused on the end of the British period in Arabia, including Southern Yemen.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)