Baku's decision to close OSCE Office sharply criticised in Vienna.

The Permanent Council of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) met in Vienna on Monday to discuss the decision of the Government of Azerbaijan to close down the office of the organisation in Baku. The Permanent Council consists of representatives of the fifty-seven member states. The extraordinary meeting was called by the Serbian Chairmanship of the OSCE.

Addressing the Permanent Council, the representative of the European Union, speaking on behalf of the twenty-eight EU member states, as well as, Albania, Bosnia-Herzogovina, Iceland, Montenegro and Norway said that the announcement of the Government of Azerbaijan "came as a complete surprise, as there were no reasons given in the Note Verbale from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, nor has there been any advance notice of the intention of the Government of Azerbaijan to that effect. Azerbaijan did not consult with participating States prior to that decision".

The EU statement added that a convincing explanation from the Government of Azerbaijan was needed.

The EU statement said,

"Azerbaijan has made important progress in areas such as relating to economic stability and development. Many challenges, however, remain for the full implementation of its OSCE commitments and the mandate of the Project Cocordinator is designed precisely to support Azerbaijan in achieving the necessary reforms and modernization, including in the development of democratic institutions, the rule of law, and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Therefore, in our view, the mandate is not completed. The decision is irreconcilable with the principles of cooperation and confidence building, principles which are at the heart of the OSCE. Closing the Office of the Project Co-ordinator in Baku is a serious step backwards in the cooperation of Azerbaijan with the OSCE. An OSCE field presence is one of the most effective ways to support participating States with implementing their OSCE commitments. The EU strongly believes that discussion of any OSCE field presence and its mandate should take place within the normal cycle of decision-making and within the established bodies and working methods of the Organisation. The EU therefore deplores the decision of the Government of Azerbaijan to terminate the Memorandum of Understanding and requests Azerbaijan to reconsider it with the goal of enabling the Project Co-ordinator to continue their activities without interruption."

You can read the statement of the European Union in full here.

The decision of the government of Azerbaijan was also criticised by the representatives of the United States and Canada. You can read the statement of the representative of the United States in full here.

The matter remains under the consideration of the OSCE Permanent Council.

source: commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
United States and Iran on the verge of agreement to end hostilities

United States and Iran on the verge of agreement to end hostilities

Updated on 13 June at 1330 CEST=========================== Source quoting Pakistani prime minister Shehbaz Sharif, says the text of a Memorandum between the US and Iran has been agreed, and is likely to be signed in the next 24 hours. Iranian sources are saying that the Memorandum is likely to be signed remotely. ==================== The United States and Iran signaled on Friday that an agreement to end their war was close, with a senior U.S. administration official saying both sides had agreed on a text and that Washington ​expects to sign an initial deal in the coming days. There are reports that the two sides will meet in Geneva in the coming 3-4 days. iAccording to the BBC, the agreement  includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's Foreign Minister has said. Seyed Abbas Araghchi told state TV the deal also includes the lifting of a US blockade of Iran, but that talks on Iran's nuclear programme would begin later. US officials have confirmed some of the details of the agreement, saying economic benefits for Iran would depend on Tehran meeting its obligations. The war began with US and Israeli strikes across Iran on 28 February, prompting Iran to attack Israel and US-allied states in the Gulf - as well as effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route for the world's oil and liquefied gas. Trump says there is "no such thing as dealing in good faith" when it comes to negotiating with the Iranians Despite having agreed a ceasefire in April, the US and Iran have exchanged intermittent fire, including two rounds of tit-for-tat strikes this week. US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he had cancelled "scheduled attacks" against Iran, because negotiators had "just made a great settlement" - a deal that was likely be to signed imminently. On Friday, Iranian media published some details from the alleged 14-point deal which Trump said had "nothing to do with the terms that were agreed to" and "bears no relation to the truth".

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)