Kasprzyk in Stepanakert as mystery of "Azerbaijani terrorists" deepens.

The Special Representative of the Swiss Chairmanship of the OSCE, Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk has visited Stepanakert where on Wednesday (16 July) he met with the President of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Bako Sahakyan.

The website of the NKR leadership said that issues related to the current stage of the conflict settlement negotiations and its prospects as well as the situation along the line of contact were discussed during the meeting. The website added that Bako Sahakyan "considered the recent intrusion of the Azerbaijani subversive group into the NKR territory as another provocative terrorist act of the official Baku and a serious blow to the negotiation process and the efforts of mediator states, adding that it must be appropriately assessed by the international community." On Friday, 11 July, Armenian sources reported an incursion by an armed Azerbaijani group in the area around Khalbajar, saying that they had captured some of its members, and killed others. Later more detailed information was released. The Armenian Defence Ministry reported that it had intercepted a three person armed terrorist group on Friday and in the shoot--out that followed one of the members of the group and an Armenian soldier were killed, whilst a civilian Armenian woman was injured. One member of the group was captured during the incident, and the third member was captured the following day. The three persons were wearing civilian cloths with no military markings and Armenia said that it will not treat them as prisoners of war but will put them on trail as terrorists.

In Azerbaijan a different story has emerged. According to an Azerbaijani version widely circulated on social media, the three persons were from the region, which is part of Azerbaijan but has been under Armenian occupation for more than twenty years. The three knew the area well and sometimes were able to evade soldiers on both sides and visit their ancestral homes. According to these version of events the three men were innocent local people who refused to accept the divisions that the war has imposed on their lives. Intriguingly this version of events is not being pushed primarily by the government media, but by independent sources. Khadija Ismailova, a respected, tough and independent minded journalist who can hardly be described as a government mouthpiece, wrote on her facebook page

"Two IDPs decided to go and see their village under Armenian occupation. One of them have been doing it every year. He was secretly using the mountain path, going to the village, filming it, visiting the graveyard of his parents, and coming back. The videos of the village he has taken during his trips were very popular among refugees, craving to see their homes. This year Dilgam Askerov and Shahbaz Guliiyev got caught by separatists. And the show started. First they were called provocateurs and spies. Armenians refused to acknowledge them as war hostage, then, in order to justify this, they decided that they need more facts to portray these guys as subversive group. And here you are, Armenian propaganda machine started. A body of teenager found, and fingers pointed to two Azerbaijanis. There is no chance that there will be an independent investigation which will not falsify the evidences and falsely accuse Askerov and Guliyev."

It is difficult to ascertain the real truth of either of these versions, but the OSCE and the ICRC are trying to defuse the issue before it gets more complicated. It is yet another example of how human suffering, nationalistic chauvinism and military adventurism mesh together in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, making it difficult to say where one starts and the other finishes.

source: commonspace.eu

phto: Ambassador Kasprzyk with the President of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic in Stepanakert on 16 July 2014. (picture courtesy of the" Office of the NKR President").

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Lebanon's parliament has voted to abolish the death penalty, a move that would make it the first country in the Middle East to formally end capital punishment. A majority of MPs in the 128-seat parliament backed the measure on Tuesday (11 August), while Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc voted against it. The legislation will now go to the cabinet before being passed to President Joseph Aoun for signing. The government has already expressed its support for the measure. Lebanon has not carried out an execution since January 2004, although courts have continued to hand down death sentences. Rights groups estimate that more than 78 people remain on death row. Under the new legislation, capital punishment will be replaced with life imprisonment with hard labour. However, the legislation does not yet set out in detail how the new sentence would be enforced. Hard labour is already written into Lebanese law but has rarely been implemented in recent years. The country's financial crisis and overcrowded prisons have limited the authorities' resources and capacity. The latest legislation follows years of campaigning by civil society groups and lawyers for the removal of capital punishment from Lebanese law. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)