ALIEV: "Democratisation of our society is a priority for us". President of Azerbaijan makes a rare reference to democratic reforms.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev, whose government has over the last months come under increasing criticism for its crackdown on dissent and opposition activism has made a rare reference to democratic reforms in his country whilst addressing the opening session of the Caucasus Forum in Baku. "We are carrying out political reforms. Democratisation of our society is a priority for us," he told participants. 

The President said that political and economic reforms should be carried out in parallel so that they support each other and the goals are achieved: "We achieved a great progress since independence, especially over the last 10 years. GDP growth made 300%, this is a record figure in the world. At the same time, we reduced poverty to 6% from 50%. The economic achievements of Azerbaijan are in the focus of attention of international institutions. The opinions of the leading international financial institutions on this are positive. According to Davos Forum indicators, competitiveness rating of Azerbaijan increased. We were able to carry out the main economic reforms in the country. In terms of economic development, transition period is over. Currently, 83% of our economic investment is provided by the private sector. Our private sector is strong enough."

In terms of economy, the future development of Azerbaijan is also attractive. Now we give much attention to the non-energy sector. Great achievements were made in non-energy sector, more than 11% growth was recorded in the first three months of 2013. This shows once again that our economy is more attractive. We want to diversify our economy and are making efforts for this, because if we do not diversify our economy, we can not gain greater achievements."

Ilham Aliev said that Azerbaijan is investing more in the modern technologies: "This year we witnessed a very important event. For the first time we launched Azerbaijan's satellite "Azerispace -1". It proves that Azerbaijan has an aerospace industry. Following this, Azerispace-2 and Azerispace-3 will be launched. Together with our international partners we intend to create a strong aerospace industry in Azerbaijan."

President Ilham Aliyev said energy is the major part for Azerbaijan's economy. "Throughout the centuries Azerbaijan has been known as an oil country. Now we are also known as a gas producing country. The investments made in the energy sector have allowed us to create a very positive investment climate. We are in the first place in the region in terms of the direct foreign investments. We have established a mechanism like State Oil Fund in order not to repeat heavy consequences, the problems faced by some countries. The State Oil Fund is known as one of the most transparent funds in the world. With this we have insured ourselves from hard conditions. We avoided the situation when the poor become poorer and the rich become richer," he said.

President Aliev added that investments are made in human capital, especially in education. "Education is a criterion preconditioning success. The history and experience of various countries show that not only economic growth, but also intellectual potential is important. 10 years ago we stated that we intended to turn the "black gold" into human capital. Diversification of economy, implementation of social projects, infrastructure projects and changes observed in Azerbaijan show that we have good experience in the field of transition - transition from the totalitarian society to the democratic society, from the state economy to the private economy," he said.

President Ilham Aliyev noted that Azerbaijan is today a country with its own resource and strong financial capacity.

"It means that economic crisis has not affected us. Of course, all this will play a role in the country's future development. We are doing this with the European countries, our neighbours so that we can enjoy more our energy potential," he said. The Azerbaijani leader said that Azerbaijan's energy resources will be sufficient for 100 more years.

source:commonspace.eu with APA news Agency

photo: Ilham Aliyev (archive picture).

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)