War in the Caucasus (with updates)

For the second day intensive fighting has been going on in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zones, with Azerbaijani forces trying to break through in two areas in the north and in the south of the line of contact. In the meantime diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting continue, with the UN Security Council expected to meet on Tuesday to consider the situation 

2000 CEST (2200 Baku Yerevan)

Military situation on the ground

Commonspace.eu political editor has been assessing reports of the military situation on the ground after the second day of intensive fighting between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone. He says:

There appear to be two fronts for the moment: one in the north and one in the south east of the line of contact. In the north Azerbaijani forces have during the day kept up the pressure on Martakert/Agdere, with heavy bombardment. Fights have been going on further north for control of mountain heights and passes. This is a strategic area, since control of the heights will give control over some key roads running from this part of Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia. This evening the Armenian Army is saying that there is a massive Azerbaijani push south of Martakert/Agdere, towards the village of Talysh.

An Armenian defence ministry source, Artsrun Hovhanissian has written on facebook

"The enemy has launched a new large-scale offensive in the Araks valley and Mataghis-Talish. The Artsakh Defense Army successfully resists all attacks and inflicts significant losses of personnel and equipment on the enemy."

In the South, Azerbaijani forces appeared to be pushing towards the town of Fizuli, and earlier in the day some Azerbaijani bloggers said that they had reached the centre of the town. But Armenian sources say this attack has been repelled.

There appear to be heavy casualties on both sides, and fighting appears to be intense.

Commonspace.eu reports about military actrivity based on secondary sources and it is not possible for us to confirm the accuracy of these reports.

1800 CEST (2000 Baku/Yerevan)

The United Nations Security Council will discuss the situation at a closed meeting on Tuesday, according to various media reports

In case you missed it here is a summary of the latest international reaction to the fighting compiled by our colleague William Murray

More international reaction to renewed conflict in Karabakh 

1345 CEST (1545 Baku/Yerevan)

Foreign mercenaries

There is one issue coming up in the reporting of the current fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone that is likely to create controversy for a long time to come. This the involvement of foreign mercenaries. Armenia accuses Azerbaijan of bringing in jihadist militants from Syria to fight on its side. Azerbaijan says that Armenia has brought in PKK militants and other Kurdish groups, including from Syria, to fight for its side. So far there is no tangible proof that either or both of these claims are true. But this will for sure be a very contentious point to be discussed in the future, once the dust settles down. We are definetely not there yet.

 

1230 CEST (1430 Baku/Yerevan)

Armenia and Azerbaijan mobilise military reservists

Over the last twenty four hours Armenia and Azerbaijan have declared martial law. Decisions were taken by the parliament of the respective countries yesterday. Armenia yesterday announced a full mobilisation of all adult male aged 18-50 years.

Azerbaijan has today announced a partial mobilisation.Reservists in the rank of soldiers, sailors, sergeants, warrant officers other non-commissioned officers under the age of 35 have been told to report for duty, as well as officers under the age of 50, or older in the case of some senior ranks.

___________

1145 CEST (1345 Baku/Yerevan)

War is never a solution!

In case you have missed it here is our editorial from this morning on commonspace.eu here

________________________

1015 CEST (1215 Baku/Yerevan)

Reports continue coming in of bombing of civilian settlement

Both sides continue to accuse each other of bombing civilian settlement.

Armenia says that the town of Martakert was being bombarded with artillary fire. Armenia also accused Azerbaijan of bombarding Stepanakert with heavy artillary and aerial bombardment during the night and early this morning

Azerbaijan on its part has accused Armenia of bombarding the town of Tartar. It said the main strategic bridge and police department of Tartar region were hit. The Azerbaijani side also said that in Tartar the building No. 10 consisting of 54 apartments on E. Safarov Street and the apartment building No. 16 in Shikh Arkh settlement of the region were hit and became unusable and the residents were evacuated.

Commonspace.eu reports military activity in the conflict zone based on secondary sources and is not able to confirm the accuracy of the reports.

0845 CEST (1045 Baku/Yerevan)

Macron holds phone calls with leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan

Whilst fighting continues this morning, diplomatic efforts to bring the conflict to a halt, also intensify. French president Emanuel Macron has been speaking with the president of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, and the prime minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan.

_______________

Fighting continued overnight between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone. Both sides accuse each other of shelling civilian targets. 

Armenia claims that the Azerbaijani armed forces have used artillery, armored vehicles and TOS multiple rocket launchers. Armenian defense minister's spokesperson Shushan Stepanyan said on Facebook.

"During the night the battles continued in different intensity. Early morning the adversary has resumed the offensive by using artillery means, armored equipment, including TOS multiple rocket launcher. The Armenian forces resist the encroachments of the Azerbaijani side and take respective actions, causing huge losses to the adversary both in the manpower and the equipment", she said.

On its part, Azerbaijan is saying that Armenian forces have been shelling the Azerbaijan town of Terter. The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry warned "the enemy for the last time that the units of the Azerbaijani army will take adequate retaliatory measures".

You can follow how the situation developed on the first day of fighting (27 September 2020) here

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Tanks move in battle formation during fighting yesterday in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone (screen grab from Maestro TV, Tbilisi)

 

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)