Chad withdraws 600 soldiers from the so-called "three borders" zone

Chad announced on Saturday (21 August) that it had halved its troops deployed in February within the anti-jihadist force of the G5 Sahel in the so-called “three borders” area, on the borders of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso. Six months ago, a contingent of 1,200 Chadian soldiers had been deployed in this area to fight against jihadist groups.

“We redeployed 600 men in Chad in agreement with the G5 Sahel forces. This is a strategic redeployment to better adapt to the organization of terrorists," Abderaman Koulamallah, government spokesman, told Agence France-Presse.

The deployment of Chadian soldiers took place within the framework of the multinational force of the G5 Sahel, a group of five Sahel countries - Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Burkina Faso - which have been trying, since 2017, to cooperate within the framework of this struggle.

The "three borders" zone is, along with central Mali, the most affected by jihadist attacks committed by groups particularly affiliated with Al-Qaida or the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (IS-GS). On Wednesday, an attack by presumed jihadists left 80 dead in northern Burkina Faso in this zone.

“We have about 600 soldiers left on the ground. This is a long-standing concerted decision with the G5 command. We wanted to lighten the device, which was not suitable," Koulamallah said. Chadian troops are based in Téra, a town in southwestern Niger.

"Compared to the situation on the ground, we need to have a mobile force, hence the withdrawal of some of our forces with heavy weapons," added the government spokesman. "Our political will to face the jihadists remains intact," he continued.

source: commonspace.eu with Le Monde (Paris) and agencies.
photo: Chadian soldier in an armoured car; Idriss Fall

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)