The ICRC builds walls to protect people from bullets in Karabakh conflict zone.

The International Committee of the Red Cross is one of the most active and respected international organisations world-wide. This is also the case in the Caucasus region where it has worked methodically and discreetly over the last twenty five years dealing with the consequences of the many conflicts that have afflicted the region 

The ICRC is most famous for its work in war time, and for looking after and arranging for the exchange of prisoners of war. It has done this work in the Caucasus as well, and in recent years has been particularly active in assisting with the cases of Armenian and Azerbaijani soldiers and combatants who end up in enemy captivity. The ICRC is also active working on the cases on many missing persons from the past conflicts.

But there is also another side to the ICRC, less known and less glamorous. This is helping the frontline civilian communities affected by conflict. Some very important work has recently been taking place with communities around the line of contact separating Armenian and Azerbaijani forces in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

According to the organisation's website, the ICRC delegation in Azerbaijan has helped many front-line communities, supporting livelihood activities and mitigating the risks of living close to the front line. One of its activities is building protective walls to shield homes from stray bullets, as people living near the front line are sometimes wounded or killed as they go about their daily activities. This is often not a simple task. An example is the plight of the Chalabi family who live in an Azerbaijani village Tap Garagoyonlu in Azerbaijan's Goranboy region.

"When the ICRC came to Tap Garagoyunlu to investigate the effect of the conflict on people in the village and offer its support, Chalabi Kishi's family asked if we could build a wall to protect the entrance against bullets. Given their location, it was clear that they were exposed and at risk," says Denise Duran, head of the ICRC's Baku delegation.

Before building such walls, the ICRC notifies the parties to the conflict that it intends to undertake work for the well-being of civilians. Through its office across the front line, the ICRC notified its plans and obtained pledges that ICRC teams and private contractors, or family members doing the work, would be able to work without the risk of shooting.

"The ICRC had to persuade truck drivers to bring bricks to Tap Garagoyunlu, as the area is known to be dangerous. They agreed to deliver only when we suggested temporarily marking their trucks with Red Cross emblems," says Ms Duran.

The Red Cross emblem signifies that activities of a purely humanitarian nature are taking place. The Geneva Conventions regulate who is entitled to use this emblem and obliges parties to armed conflicts to protect the personnel and objects displaying it and to facilitate their work.

"To make things even more complicated, the road behind Chalabi Kishi's house is very exposed to shooting and drivers are afraid to use it," explains Ms Duran. "Chalabi and his family had been entering their home from a neighbour's gate on foot for years so as not to risk using the road. But it's the only road by which we could deliver bricks and other building materials for the protective wall. Protected by the Red Cross emblem, trucks used that road for the first time in 19 years and delivered the materials in safety."

As the trucks entered the yard, Chalabi was speechless with happiness and amazement. His wife spoke for both: "Nobody was visiting us because they were afraid of getting shot. Now, we will have guests in our house again after 19 long years."

 

As is to be expected the ICRC works on both sides of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict divide. At the moment the delegation of the ICRC to Armenia is implementing a number of programs in villages of the Tavush Region bordering with Azerbaijan, Sarah Epprecht, Head of the ICRC Delegation in Armenia, told Armenian News-NEWS.am.

She said the most vulnerable villages were selected as they are located near the border and villagers have less access to infrastructure and land.

"In 2013 we implemented projects on supplying drinking and irrigation water, distributed wheat seeds, fruit tree saplings," she said.

Other activities that are carried out both on the Armenian and Azerbaijani side concern the incidents involving or directed against the civilian population.

"In the event of an incident, we visit the area, collect information about the incident as far as it is possible, and then turn to the responsible authorities," Epprecht said.

Then, ICRC experts present information on their view and recommendations in terms of the violation of the International Humanitarian Law in connection with this incident.

source: commonspace.eu with www.icrc.org and news.am

 

photo: Garagoyunlu, Goranboy district, Azerbaijan. Trucks loaded with materials for the wall that will protect Chalabi Kishi and his family from bullets approach along a road that had not been used for 19 years, (picture courtesy of the ICRC).

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)