Georgia's awkward neighbours.

Georgia has summoned the Armenian Ambassador following meeting between Chairman of Armenian Parliament and South Ossetian official. In this op-ed for commonspace.eu Dennis Sammut discusses tensions in Georgia's relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan

The relationship between Georgia and its two neighbours in the South Caucasus - Armenia and Azerbaijan - has always been unusual. Even at best of times it is a difficult balancing act, trying to keep the best of relations with the two neighbours that consider each other enemies, whilst getting the best deal for Georgia in the meantime.

Relations between Georgians and Armenians have traditionally been competitive, but reasonably friendly. The two countries share a common Christian background and both boast to have some of the oldest roots of civilisation. There were often tense moments in the history of Georgian-Armenian relations but, with a few exceptions, common sense prevailed. Both sides knew that their nations were too intertwined for anything but good neighbourly relations to be acceptable.

Georgia's relationship with Azerbaijan has in modern times been less competitive, and thus somewhat easier to manage. Recent Azerbaijani assertiveness, fuelled by oil revenues, has not changed this very much because it also came with considerable economic benefit.

This has been the trend for the last two decades and more. At times, for example during the administration of President Shevardnadze, Georgia projected itself as the champion of the South Caucasus and positively promoted regional co-operation. Under President Saakashvili regional co-operation was out of favour, but the Georgian government maintained very good bilateral relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan nonetheless. The current Georgian government has stuck mainly to this format, whilst also supporting a trilateral relationship with Azerbaijan and Turkey.

But under the façade of Presidential hugs and promises of eternal friendship tensions exist. The large Armenian and Azerbaijani communities in Georgia have always been both a bridge for friendship and a source of tension. Some Georgians persist in seeing them as a fifth column, although in truth most of the minority communities have for most of the time been nothing but very compliant.

Over the last few days a number of new irritants have been introduced to this complex relationship. First, former President Saakashvili, who is wanted in Georgia by the Prosecutor's Office, turned up in Baku for a high profile event attended by President Aliev. Such a development could hardly have been possible without the approval of Aliev himself. Georgian calls for Saakashvili to be extradited were as expected, ignored. Azerbaijan has been irritated recently by the dislocation of some of their opposition to Tbilisi, and by the focus on Azerbaijan of some Georgian human rights activists. Many saw the presence of Saakashvili in Baku as a gentle reminder to Tbilisi that people in glass houses should not throw stones.

Now in a second development in a week, the Armenian Ambassador in Tbilisi has been summoned to the Georgian Foreign Ministry and told in no uncertain terms of Georgia's displeasure that the Chairman of the Armenian Parliament had met the Chairman of the Parliament of South Ossetia. That the meeting has taken place has now been confirmed by both South Ossetian and Armenian sources, although a spokesman of the Armenian Parliament was quick to emphasise that the meeting was of a "private" nature. Georgia is very sensitive about contacts with the separatist leadership in South Ossetia, and Armenia would have been aware of these sensitivities. Why they chose to have the meeting now is not clear, but there is speculation that Armenia is upset with the new Georgia-Azerbaijan-Turkey relations.

It is most likely that for the moment all sides will let matters rest. There is neither the mood, nor the need at present to do otherwise. But the Georgian government would have drawn its own conclusions from the two incidents. There is a danger that the current Georgian government will imitate its predecessor and withdraw metaphorically from the Caucasus to the greener fields of Europe. After all Georgia is now the only South Caucasus country with Associate membership of the European Union. But such a policy is neither wise nor realistic. Georgia is the heart of the Caucasus and it has a role to play in the region. Georgia needs to manage its relationship with its two neighbours, even if, at least from Tbilisi's perspective, they are awkward neighbours.  

source: Dennis Sammut contributed this op-ed for commonspace.eu

photo: President Aliev of Azerbaijan with former president Saakashvili of Georgia (archive picture)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)
Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakh president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, declared September 25 a national day of mourning following the deaths of servicemen during military exercises in the Caspian Sea. Twelve Kazakh servicemen died after being swept into the Caspian Sea during the Khazar Qorgany–2026 naval exercises in the Mangystau region on Thursday (September 24). The incident occurred after weather conditions suddenly deteriorated and winds intensified during a combat training mission. In a Telegram post, the Ministry of Defence reported that 19 servicemen had been swept into the sea. So far, three have been rescued, one of whom was hospitalized, while 12 bodies have been recovered.  Search operations were continuing for the remaining four servicemen. A large-scale rescue and recovery effort has been launched, involving Kazakhstan’s Naval Forces, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, aviation assets and other relevant services.   Deputy Prime Minister Kanat Bozumbayev, who is leading a government commission at the scene, ordered a continuous, round-the-clock search for those still missing. Authorities were also instructed to provide financial and other assistance to the families of the deceased. (click image to read in full)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)