Georgian opposition says government shows weakness in dealing with Russia. Joseph Alexander Smith reports from Tbilisi.

Crowds thronged the main thoroughfare of the Georgian capital Tbilisi on Saturday  (15th November) to protest alleged Russian attempts to 'annex' the break-away territory of Abkhazia. The demonstration, which was organized by the opposition United National Movement (UNM) party of former president Mikheil Saakashvili, also criticized what it called the current government's "collaborationist" policies.

The opposition announced plans to hold a rally last month, in reaction to a Russian-proposed treaty for "alliance and integration" with Abkhazia. The draft treaty provides for joint Russian-Abkhaz initiatives in defence and law enforcement, as well as measures to integrate Abkhazia into the Russian Federation's healthcare and social security system.

The publication of the draft treaty sparked condemnation in Tbilisi, with the Georgian parliament adopting a statement objecting to Russia's "attempt to annex occupied Abkhazia". The statement was not supported by the UNM parliamentary minority, however, which proposed its own resolution calling for Georgian withdrawal from informal bilateral talks with Russia.

Led by UNM lawmakers and joined by supporters from other parts of Georgia, protesters marched from Rose Revolution Square to the old parliament building on Rustaveli Avenue in the centre of Tbilisi. While some carried Georgian, EU and American flags, others waved placards with slogans such as "No to Annexation!" and "Stop Russia!" A large NATO flag was unfurled by demonstrators opposite the parliament building, and several waved the banner of the UNM-led protest group Free Zone.

UNM MP Giorgi Gabashvili slammed the authorities as "collaborationst", telling the assembled crowd that the government is "deceiving itself, its own people and the entire world as though [Georgia] were busy mending relations with the occupiers [ie. Russia]."

Former President Mikheil Saakashvili, who is facing a criminal investigation in Georgia for exceeding powers, addressed the crowds via video link from Kiev saying that "the whole nation must stand together before it is too late and must loudly tell Bidzina Ivanishvili that it does not share his dream."

A coalition of several political parties, led by businessman Bidhzina Ivanishvili unseated Saakashvili's UNM in parliamentary elections two years ago, and has attempted to defrost relations with Russia through informal dialogue, as well as pursuing a vigorously pro-Western foreign policy aimed at integrating Georgia into NATO and the EU.

 "I've come to say no to annexation, no to Russia and no to this policy of compliance that is in full swing in Georgia" said Giorgi, one of the protesters gathered in central Tbilisi. "My wish is for Georgia to be united and Abkhazia to be returned" said another protester, Khatia.

The former head of Saakashvili's presidential administration, Andro Barnov, told Commonspace.eu that the Russian-Abkhaz draft treaty amounts to "effective annexation of our land" and is something Georgians will "never tolerate". He criticized the government for not having a "principled position" and for "not protesting what Russia is doing".

Estimates of the number of protesters on the city streets range from a few thousand to 'tens of thousands'. Russia's annexation of Crimea in March this year - as well as its continued support to separatist rebels in Eastern Ukraine - have unsettled many in Georgia, who believe Russia is attempting to annex its break-away regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Both territories declared independence with Russian backing after the August War of 2008 and both governments - which are recognized by only a handful of foreign states - are heavily dependent on Russia for financial and military support.

source: Joseph Alexander Smith reporting from Tbilisi for commonspace.eu

photo: UNM supporters at a protest rally in Tbilisi on Saturday, 15 November 2014.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)