Russian newspaper speculates about the absence of Ilham Aliev from the summit of the CIS in Dushanbe on 2-3 September

The Russian Newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta carried the folllowing article on the forthcoming Summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States to be held in Dushanbe on 2-3 Septemberhe  (reprinted here from a translation from news.az)

Instead of celebrations of its 20th anniversary, the CIS will have to calculate losses on that day. President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev will not come to Dushanbe to attend the Commonwealth summit scheduled for 2-3 September. The reason is supposed to be the failed talks on Karabakh, which Aliyev held with Dmitriy Medvedev in Sochi.

Experts consider this step to be a signal to Moscow-Russia ceases to be a mediator in the conflicts resolution in its partners’ eyes. Additionally, fraternal capital cities accuse it of launching commercial wars to inflict economic and political compromises that are favorable for the Kremlin. These opinions are primarily voiced in GUAM states including Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova.

Thus year, declared the year of CIS in the Commonwealth countries, turned not the luckiest one, especially in integration affairs that were planned to move beyond the Customs Union (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan).

“Putin has practically blocked the free trade area, which was the goal of all the CIS countries. Without it, all the rest programs of the Commonwealth, that are variants of mutual assistance in different spheres, are a ground to ask: why is that? It is especially actual in Ukraine, where people say that Gazprom is preparing a new gas war for us, pushing us to membership in the Customs Union”, said director of the Kiev Institute of Political Analysis and International Research Sergey Tolstov.

He said Viktor Yanukovich will not follow Ilham Aliyev’s example and will not reject participation in Dushanbe directly. However, if the style of relations that Moscow uses in the dialogue with CIS partners continues, the Ukrainian President will find many other ways to avoid the Commonwealth summits. “The factor that the CIS can be used as a area to smooth differences between the commonwealth members, will stop working now”, Tolstov said.

“The fact that Aliyev has done this step is bad for Russia, since it is losing its image of a mediator in its partners’ eyes, gaining another one of an Armenian lobbyist. The steps of Aliyev, a cautious and wise politician, show (from Aliyev’s positions) what he has been brought to.  It is sad also for the CIS, which marks its 20th anniversary without Georgia”, the expert of the Moscow Center of Carnegie Alexei Malashenko said.

“Aliyev’s step confirms disability of the CIS. The proof is the constant trade wars and interstate conflicts in its framework”, Malashenko commented to NG.

The report that Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev will not take part at the upcoming summit of the CIS heads of states came yesterday, causing a plenty of questions. The main is that why official Baku changed its decision three days after it first confirmed its participation. Official sources do not comment on the reason of such an unexpected change of plans.

It has promoted suppositions that Aliyev’s demarche is mostly connected with the recent events in the negotiation process to settle the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno Karabakh. They say that Baku is not satisfied with the position of mediators, particularly, their unwillingness to exert pressure on Armenia, which has been holding seven biggest and economically important regions of Azerbaijan under occupation for almost 20 years.

“Azerbaijan does not ignore the CIS summit and will be represented at the high level-by head of the Cabinet of Ministers Artur Rasizade. I will not be surprised if leaders of some other CIS countries will do the same. It is not the first time that it occurs, which is why the situation should not be dramatized”, famous political scientist, member of the committee on international relations of the Azerbaijani parliament Rasim Musabayov told NG.

He said ‘even format CIS summits have turned into a club of post-Soviet presidents. The meetings of the past decades adopt and implement decisions only on minor, rather ritual issues like celebrations of a jubilee of victory in the Great Patriotic War. For this reason, the summits are interesting as a venue for bilateral meetings. It is not a secret that most presidents arrive to the CIS summit, if they have a preliminary agreement about the meeting with the Russian president. In this sense, there is no motivation for participation of President Aliyev in the CIS informal summit in Dushanbe, Musabayov said.

“Azerbaijan maintains stable bilateral relations with all CIS countries and these relations do not need the CIS support. Ilham Aliyev has met the Russian president Medvedev just recently in Sochi and discussed the Russian-Azerbaijani relations and the situation around the Karabakh issue in detail”, Musabayov said. All the same, he said ‘the stiff determination of the Armenian side to promote the possibility of secession of Nagorno Karabakh in any form has done the continuation of the negotiation process unpromising at this stage. For this reason, the trilateral meeting of Aliyev, Medvedev and Sargsyan is senseless and not planning. In this case, there is no need to go to Dushanbe and waste time”, said the political scientist.

Azerbaijan and Ukraine are members of GUAM, the regional organization, once founded as an element, curbing Moscow’s ambitions in the post-Soviet area. Georgia was first to quit the CIS. Moldova was also ready to do so, but it follows its more influential neighbor-Ukraine. The latter is by far trying to preserve friendly ties with ‘fraternal’ Russia. But these relations have currently been put to the test. Yanukovych, who also have other commitments, for instance,  towards the EU and IMF cannot ignore them, as he cannot do so with the national interests of his country.

The Ukrainian president also does not want to give its own transportation system to Russia, like Belarus did. “Yanukovych will never give the keys to the internal market of Ukraine to Russia”, Tolstov said. He noted that ‘Moscow will exert pressure on Kiev to force Ukraine to the transit agreement to prove to the EU that the Ukrainian transit is not reliable and thus lobby the Southern stream. For this reason, it is not ruled out that Ukraine should be expected to be the next to make a step back from the CIS. There is no doubt that in this event, Moldova will follow it.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

The European Commission disbursed €1.24 billion to Ukraine on Wednesday (October 7) under the defence component of the €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan, earmarked for drones, drone interceptors, ammunition, and missiles produced by Ukrainian entities. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the payment would strengthen Ukraine’s defence industry and its ability to protect people and infrastructure. She described Russia’s ongoing attacks as a deliberate strategy intended to make daily life increasingly difficult for Ukrainians. The Ukraine Support Loan provides an indicative €60 billion for defence and €30 billion for budgetary assistance during 2026–2027. The European Commission plans to disburse €28.3 billion for Ukraine’s defence industrial capacity in 2026, with further payments under the defence component expected in the coming weeks. Funding decisions are based on Ukraine’s evolving requirements and remain subject to agreed conditions and monitoring. According to Ukrainian Prime Minister Serhiy Koretskyi, the latest payment brings Ukraine’s defence financing received through the programme to nearly €13 billion. He said the government would continue working with European partners to ensure the remaining planned funding is delivered on schedule and in full For the remainder of 2026, €32.5 billion in EU financial support remains available to Ukraine. This includes €28.1 billion under the Ukraine Support Loan – €15.4 billion for defence industrial capacity and €12.7 billion in budget support. A further €4.4 billion remains available through the Ukraine Facility, bringing the total budget support available for 2026 to more than €17 billion, subject to Ukraine meeting the relevant conditions. Since 2022, the EU and its member states have provided €228.7 billion in overall support to Ukraine, including €3.8 billion generated from immobilised Russian assets.
Editor's choice
News
In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

Government forces in Ethiopia, have taken control of the town of Mekelle, capital of the Tigray region. Earlier, Ethiopia's federal military said it had recaptured the main airport in the capital of the northern Tigray region, dealing a major setback to an ​opposition alliance in its stronghold. Clashes pitting a rebel alliance led by Tigray's ruling party ‌against the government and its allied forces broke out in northern Ethiopia last week, in the most serious escalation of violence since a 2020-2022 civil war. The fighting has stoked fears that it could escalate into a wider regional conflict, potentially drawing in neighbouring ​countries in the Horn of Africa and the Gulf. In recent days Ethiopia and Eritrea broke off diplomatic relations amid mutual accusations. In Washington, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott ​said the United States strongly urged Ethiopia and Eritrea to "exercise maximum restraint and return ⁠to dialogue and cooperation as agreed in their 2018 peace framework." "The Horn of Africa cannot sustain another ​military conflict and humanitarian crisis," Pigott said. "A conflict jeopardizes ongoing U.S. collaboration on shared interests with both countries." The ​federal government in Addis Ababa accused Eritrea of supporting the rebel alliance alongside Sudan and Egypt. The three countries deny this. Troops from the Ethiopian National Defence Forces had regained control of Alula Aba ​Nega Airport in Tigray's capital Mekelle,   A Mekelle resident who asked not to be named for security reasons, confirmed the ‌taking of ⁠the airport by government forces and added they could hear gunfire outside the city centre. This source said they had seen some Tigrayan Defence Force fighters abandoning their posts and heading home, and that there was looting of government facilities taking place in the city. Mekelle's airport, which ​is around 10 km (6 miles) from the centre of the city, was ​one of three ⁠airports in the region that were seized by the opposition forces at the start of the fighting on September 23. The taking of Mekelle by government forces would be a major setback for the opposition alliance, although analysts say ⁠it ​would be unlikely to end the conflict. In 2020, federal forces captured ​Mekelle within the first month of the two year war before the TPLF reclaimed it seven months later.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)