"Cynics should hold their peace. Young civil society has much to give"

Opinion: "At a work-shop with young people from 14 countries in Borjomi last weekend I was once more reminded of the great resource of hope, ideas, energy and good will that lies largely untapped, but that is much needed if we are going to seriously engage in tackling global and regional challenges ahead", writes Dennis Sammut in this op-ed.

I spent last weekend in the Georgian town of Borjomi, together with a group of forty-five mainly young people, discussing global and regional issues. Whilst many of the participants were from the Caucasus region, others came from other parts of Europe and its neighbourhood.

The event was an initiative of LINKS (Dialogue, Analysis and Research), a small action oriented think tank with a long track record of work in the Caucasus. LINKS is twenty years old this year, and it decided to mark the occasion by going back to the Caucasus to engage with a new generation of activists and thinkers on the main issues of the day.

I have been to hundreds of such meetings over the years, but rarely have I left a meeting so hopeful and so energised. It was not simply the sense of optimism among participants and their ability to think positively and creatively that was most striking, but more so the sense of acute awareness of the challenges ahead.

The timing was not easy - Armenian and Azerbaijan participants were very much sensitive to the fact that in the previous days there had been much bloodshed in the Karabakh conflict zone - Azerbaijani civilians and teenage Armenian conscripts had lost their lives.

Beyond, the crisis in the Gulf was reaching its climax, and on the television screens images of the G20 summit in Hamburg flickered in the background reminding us all of the huge problems facing humanity. But the new generation is no longer willing to accept simplistic answers to complex problems.

The challenge of how to receive and digest information in today's global information jungle may seem daunting, but young people appear to be more discerning than their elders - not quite immune yet to fake news and disinformation, but certainly more aware of it. Social and civil activism is now also taking new forms, cleverly manoeuvring around ever emerging constraints. This is also happening on the global arena where a "third generation" of public diplomacy initiatives and ideas is slowly emerging leaving traditional diplomacy struggling to catch up.

In Borjomi last weekend these difficult issues could be discussed openly and calmly, and what emerged was a wealth of ideas on what can be done better in the future, and how. The tone was set by the keynote speaker, Lord Purvis of Tweed, a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the UK House of Lords, who presented a set of challenging and innovative ideas in an excellent and thoughtful opening presentation.

In my work I am often obliged to engage simultaneously with traditional political and diplomatic settings, and in track 2 informal and alternative frameworks. Indeed, an important part of my job is to try to bridge the two. Established politicians and diplomats are often dismissive of civil society initiatives, evaluating them as irrelevant at best. In Borjomi this weekend I was once more convinced of the folly of this approach.

There is a wealth of energy and ideas in many track 2 processes that are much needed if the big challenges of the day are to be resolved. In the Caucasus region, the EU supported EPNK initiative is now engaged in such a venture, despite the fact that the support of governments in the region, as well as the more traditional international diplomatic frameworks, is often lukewarm. Yet despite the all-round cynicism that I encounter every day in the international community, in Borjomi last weekend I was once more reminded of the great resource of hope, ideas, energy and good-will that lies largely untapped, but that is much needed if we are going to seriously engage in tackling global and regional challenges ahead. Cynics should hold their peace. Young civil society has much to give.

Dennis Sammut is the Executive Director and co-founder of LINKS (Dialogue, Analysis and Research). The workshop "Global challenges, shifting regional parameters, and the need for innovative responses" was held in Borjomi, Georgia from 7-9 July 2017 as part of the activities marking the 20th anniversary of LINKS (DAR). For more information please contact office@links-dar.org

photo: Young civil society participants from 14 countries participated at a LINKS (DAR) workshop in Borjomi, Georgia on 7- 9 July 2017

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)