Medvedev does not understand why Ukraine wants association with EU. As Russian pressure on neighbours continues Putin's adviser says Armenia was nearly dragged by the EU "into a conveyor belt".

Russian Prime Minister Dimitri Medvedev has again questioned Ukraine's wish to enter into an Association Agreement with the European Union. Speaking at a press Conference with his Ukrainian counterpart Mykola Azarov, after a meeting of the Russia-Ukraine Intergovernmental Commission, Medvedev said that he did not know why Ukraine wanted to sign an association agreement with the European Union and that he could not see any particular benefits for Ukraine in doing so.

"One thing is clear: Of course, after an association agreement is signed - and this is our open, simple and sincere position - it will be very difficult for Ukraine to join the Customs Union if it wants to," he said. "I believe [its] chances for full-fledged membership will be practically zero," the Russian Prime Minister said, according to RIA Novosti. Medvedev reiterated that Moscow wanted to build an "economic union, not some amorphous association," so the "Russia-Kazakhstan-Belarus plus Ukraine" formula was unacceptable.

Russian officials have been very active in recent weeks in an effort to derail plans of the European Union to sign Association Agreements with those Eastern neighbours who wanted to do so and who satisified the EU stringent criteria. Most of the Russian arms twisting has been taking place behind the scenes, but one senior Russian official has apparently been given the role of wielding the knife in the open. President Putin's Adviser Sergey Glazyev has given several interviews aimed at adding pressure on the leadership of those countries that continue to reject the Russian "customs union" option.

Speaking on the popular Radio Station "Echo of Moscow" on 10 October Glazyev said that European officials impose their standard text worked out over dozens of years upon their Eastern partners. Glazyev said that Armenia was almost dragged into a conveyor but "with the support of our experts, we helped our Armenian counterparts analyse the text of the agreement with the EU".

"One can't get associated with the EU and sign the Agreement on Common Economic Space with Russia simultaneously. Obviously, it's not possible from a legal point of view. The Armenian government got confused in its choices. They thought they could simultaneously sign the Agreement with the EU and remain part of the CSTO, for instance. And there is a political component there as well which reads that the side concluding an Association Agreement with the EU is committed to following the lead of  European policy and take part in the settlement of the regional conflicts under the EU guidance. And then the President as a person responsible for the country's security was asked the question: "How is it possible to be involved in the settlement of NK conflict with Azerbaijan under the EU leadership?" That's an interesting question. When such simple questions are asked it's obvious that the draft Association Agreement deprives the country of sovereignty, independence and makes it EU's colony", said Sergey Glazyev.

According to him, expert consultations are currently being held and "by 2015, both Kyrgyzstan and Armenia will join simultaneously the Customs Union, Common Economic Space and Eurasian Union".

The Russian President's Advisor said that as a part of a single customs territory, Armenia will technically have the same customs regime as Kaliningrad region of Russian Federation.

Answering a question about Ukraine, Sergey Glazyev said: "I am sure common sense will prevail".

You can listen to the interview of Sergei Glazyev (in Russian) on "Echo of Moscow", in full here.

source: Commonspace.eu with Echo of Moscow, Ria Novosti and Mediamax.

photo: Russian Prime Minister Medvedev with Ukrainian Prime Minister at the meeting of the Russia-Ukraine Inter-Governmental Commission (picture courtesy of the Press Service of the Prime Minister of Russia)

 

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)