Medvedev does not understand why Ukraine wants association with EU. As Russian pressure on neighbours continues Putin's adviser says Armenia was nearly dragged by the EU "into a conveyor belt".

Russian Prime Minister Dimitri Medvedev has again questioned Ukraine's wish to enter into an Association Agreement with the European Union. Speaking at a press Conference with his Ukrainian counterpart Mykola Azarov, after a meeting of the Russia-Ukraine Intergovernmental Commission, Medvedev said that he did not know why Ukraine wanted to sign an association agreement with the European Union and that he could not see any particular benefits for Ukraine in doing so.

"One thing is clear: Of course, after an association agreement is signed - and this is our open, simple and sincere position - it will be very difficult for Ukraine to join the Customs Union if it wants to," he said. "I believe [its] chances for full-fledged membership will be practically zero," the Russian Prime Minister said, according to RIA Novosti. Medvedev reiterated that Moscow wanted to build an "economic union, not some amorphous association," so the "Russia-Kazakhstan-Belarus plus Ukraine" formula was unacceptable.

Russian officials have been very active in recent weeks in an effort to derail plans of the European Union to sign Association Agreements with those Eastern neighbours who wanted to do so and who satisified the EU stringent criteria. Most of the Russian arms twisting has been taking place behind the scenes, but one senior Russian official has apparently been given the role of wielding the knife in the open. President Putin's Adviser Sergey Glazyev has given several interviews aimed at adding pressure on the leadership of those countries that continue to reject the Russian "customs union" option.

Speaking on the popular Radio Station "Echo of Moscow" on 10 October Glazyev said that European officials impose their standard text worked out over dozens of years upon their Eastern partners. Glazyev said that Armenia was almost dragged into a conveyor but "with the support of our experts, we helped our Armenian counterparts analyse the text of the agreement with the EU".

"One can't get associated with the EU and sign the Agreement on Common Economic Space with Russia simultaneously. Obviously, it's not possible from a legal point of view. The Armenian government got confused in its choices. They thought they could simultaneously sign the Agreement with the EU and remain part of the CSTO, for instance. And there is a political component there as well which reads that the side concluding an Association Agreement with the EU is committed to following the lead of  European policy and take part in the settlement of the regional conflicts under the EU guidance. And then the President as a person responsible for the country's security was asked the question: "How is it possible to be involved in the settlement of NK conflict with Azerbaijan under the EU leadership?" That's an interesting question. When such simple questions are asked it's obvious that the draft Association Agreement deprives the country of sovereignty, independence and makes it EU's colony", said Sergey Glazyev.

According to him, expert consultations are currently being held and "by 2015, both Kyrgyzstan and Armenia will join simultaneously the Customs Union, Common Economic Space and Eurasian Union".

The Russian President's Advisor said that as a part of a single customs territory, Armenia will technically have the same customs regime as Kaliningrad region of Russian Federation.

Answering a question about Ukraine, Sergey Glazyev said: "I am sure common sense will prevail".

You can listen to the interview of Sergei Glazyev (in Russian) on "Echo of Moscow", in full here.

source: Commonspace.eu with Echo of Moscow, Ria Novosti and Mediamax.

photo: Russian Prime Minister Medvedev with Ukrainian Prime Minister at the meeting of the Russia-Ukraine Inter-Governmental Commission (picture courtesy of the Press Service of the Prime Minister of Russia)

 

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Lebanon's parliament has voted to abolish the death penalty, a move that would make it the first country in the Middle East to formally end capital punishment. A majority of MPs in the 128-seat parliament backed the measure on Tuesday (11 August), while Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc voted against it. The legislation will now go to the cabinet before being passed to President Joseph Aoun for signing. The government has already expressed its support for the measure. Lebanon has not carried out an execution since January 2004, although courts have continued to hand down death sentences. Rights groups estimate that more than 78 people remain on death row. Under the new legislation, capital punishment will be replaced with life imprisonment with hard labour. However, the legislation does not yet set out in detail how the new sentence would be enforced. Hard labour is already written into Lebanese law but has rarely been implemented in recent years. The country's financial crisis and overcrowded prisons have limited the authorities' resources and capacity. The latest legislation follows years of campaigning by civil society groups and lawyers for the removal of capital punishment from Lebanese law. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)