The high cost in human life of the current fighting in Karabakh

Commentary

Speaking yesterday at the opening of the meeting of the OSCE Permanent Council, held in Vienna to discuss the current fighting in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, Ambassador Igli Hasani, Chair of the Permanent Council, expressed his dismay at the rising number of casualties resulting from the ongoing hostilities. The heavy toll on human life resulting from the fighting that has been ongoing since Sunday morning must indeed be the main news in this story.

It is not yet possible to say accurately what are the number of dead and wounded, but given the scale of the fighting, and all the anecdotal evidence available, it is clear that it already amounts to hundreds, and is growing daily. Civilians on both sides have also been affected; several died, including women, children and old people.

These facts remind us that war is not a computer game. Nor is it a geo strategic game. Warfare takes a heavy toll on nations, damages populations, and leaves a scar on families and communities for a long time after.

The recent story of Nagorno-Karabakh is a tragic story of human suffering: of families displaced by conflict from their homes for decades; of populations living under siege; of young people deprived of their youth, which they spend instead holding guns in wet trenches, and of a distorted way of life for hundreds of thousands who are directly affected by the conflict.

This must stop. Not only the on-going fighting, but also the chain of hatred that has led to it, and which inevitably, unless broken, will mean that even when the current fighting stops, all there would be to look forward to is the next round of violence. Nagorno-Karabakh does not require a cease fire only. It also requires a negotiated solution from which all sides can benefit. This should now be the objective, so that at least all this suffering would not have been in vain.

source: This is a commentary by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

photo: An Armenian air ambulance transfers a wounded soldier from Stepanakert to a hospital in Yerevan.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)