Commentary: Did someone try to distabilise Georgia this weekend?

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

A wave of ugly rioting hit the Georgian Black sea port of Batumi on Saturday night.

Initial reports suggested that the incident started over an argument on a parking ticket, which soon escalated and turned into a riot, during which dozens were injured and property damaged, and in response to which police fired tear gas and arrested dozens. Such incidents have happened before in many countries, particularly were underlying discontent is simmering beneath the surface. But as things calmed down in Batumi during the day, a somewhat more sinister picture started to emerge, suggesting that this was perhaps not a spontaneous outburst at all, but had been planned in advance.

As the Ombudsman of Georgia who conducted a preliminary assessment of the situation concluded, it was impossible for the sequence of events to have happened without prior planning. The congregation of large groups of people close to where the initial incident occurred, and the availability to protestors of Molotov cocktails so soon after the incident happened, suggests that this was a planned provocation.

Georgia has had its fair share of political upheavel in the last three decades, but in recent years the political situation stabilised as democracy consolidated and the rule of law started taking root. These achievements are not yet strong enough to be irreversible. Incidents like the one in Batumi this weekend are therefore of serious concern.

The Georgian government must now conduct a full and independent investigation into events in order to expose the facts. The conduct of the police, at every level of the chain of command must be part of this scrutiny. But if political forces, internal or external, were somehow behind the incidents, then they must also be exposed so that the Georgian people will know who is trying to gamble with their future.

Beyond that the Government of Prime Minister Kvirikashvili needs to assess its work in Adjara, which is an Autonomous Republic within Georgia, and where one would expect the government to show sensitivity to local sensibilities. The imposition of an outside police command over the police force in the territory has been cited as a cause of recent discontent. There are other issues in Adjara that need attention, including respect for the local Georgian Muslim minority who have always been exemplary Georgian patriots as well as citizens, and discontent with how the benefits of the economic progress in the territory in the last decade has been distributed.

Georgia has achieved a lot in the last years, in both the political and economic sectors, and in terms of its standing in the world. That there may be those who do not like to see this is quite obvious. However no one should be allowed to disrupt the life of the Georgian people, and any change needs to happen through the ballot box, not through rioting and violence.

This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

photo: scenes of distruction in Batumi following rioting early on Sunday, 12 March 2017

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular