The agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan, initialed at the White House in Washington DC, on Friday 8 August 2025, has been published on the website of the Armenian Foreign Ministry

The agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan, initialed at the White House in Washington DC on Friday, 8 August 2025 has been published.

The website of the Armenian Foreign said that, by mutual consent, the initialed agreement "On the establishment of peace and interstate relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan" is hereby published.

 Here is the full text:

Agreement  on the establishment of peace and interstate relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan

The Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan (hereinafter referred to as the Parties),

Recognizing the urgent need to establish a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region,

Seeking to contribute to the achievement of this goal through the establishment of interstate relations,

Guided by the Charter of the United Nations, the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (1970), the Final Act of the Helsinki Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (1975) and the Almaty Declaration of 21 December 1991, and aiming to develop relations on the basis of the norms and principles enshrined in the aforementioned documents,

Expressing their mutual desire to establish good neighborly relations between them,

have agreed to establish peace and interstate relations between themselves on the following basis:

ARTICLE I

Affirming that the borders between the former Soviet Socialist Republics of the USSR have become the international borders of the respective independent states and have been recognized as such by the international community, the Parties recognize and will respect each other's sovereignty, territorial integrity, inviolability of international borders and political independence.

ARTICLE II

In full compliance with Article I, the Parties confirm that they have no territorial claims against each other and will not make such claims in the future.

The Parties shall not take any action, including the planning, preparation, encouragement and support of such actions, which aims at the dismemberment or impairment, in whole or in part, of the territorial integrity or political unity of the other Party.

ARTICLE III

The Parties shall refrain in their mutual relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any Party or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations. They shall not permit any third party to use their respective territories against the other Party for the use of force inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

ARTICLE IV

The Parties will refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs.

ARTICLE V

Within _____ days after the exchange of notifications by both Parties that their internal procedures for ratification of this Agreement have been completed, the Parties shall establish diplomatic relations with each other in accordance with the provisions of the Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations (1961 and 1963, respectively).

ARTICLE VI

In full compliance with their obligations under Article I of this Agreement, the Parties shall conduct negotiations in good faith between the relevant border commissions, in accordance with the regulations agreed upon by the Commissions, with a view to concluding an agreement on the delimitation and demarcation of the state border between the Parties.

ARTICLE VII

The Parties will not deploy any third party forces along their common border. The Parties, pending the demarcation of their mutual border and subsequent demarcation, will implement mutually agreed security and confidence-building measures, including in the military sphere, to ensure security and stability in the border areas.

ARTICLE VIII

The Parties condemn and will combat intolerance, racial hatred and discrimination, separatism, violent extremism and terrorism in all their manifestations, each within the framework of its jurisdiction, and will ensure the implementation of international obligations applicable to them.

ARTICLE IX

The Parties undertake to address the cases of missing persons and enforced disappearances in armed conflict involving both Parties, including by exchanging, directly or, where appropriate, in cooperation with relevant international organizations, all available information on such persons. The Parties hereby recognize the importance of establishing the fate of such persons, including the search for and, where appropriate, the return of their remains, and of ensuring justice for such persons through proper investigation, as a means of reconciliation and confidence-building. Appropriate arrangements in this regard will be negotiated and agreed in detail in a separate agreement.

ARTICLE X

The Parties may conclude agreements in various areas of mutual interest, including economic, transit and transport, environmental, humanitarian and cultural cooperation.

ARTICLE XI

This Agreement shall not limit the rights and obligations of the Parties under international law and treaties concluded by each Party with other Member States of the United Nations. Each Party shall ensure that no international agreements in force between it and any third party shall impair the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.

ARTICLE XII

The Parties shall be guided in their bilateral relations by international law and this Agreement. Neither Party may invoke the provisions of its domestic law as justification for failure to comply with this Agreement.

The Parties, in accordance with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), shall refrain from any action that would defeat the object and purpose of this Agreement until its entry into force.

ARTICLE XIII

The Parties shall ensure the full implementation of this Agreement and shall establish a bilateral Commission to monitor the implementation of this Agreement. The Commission shall operate on the basis of regulations to be agreed upon by the Parties.

ARTICLE XIV

Without prejudice to the rights and obligations assumed by the Parties under international law and other treaties binding on them in their mutual relations, the Parties shall endeavour to resolve any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement through direct consultations, including within the framework of the Commission referred to in Article XIII. If such consultations do not produce a result acceptable to both Parties within a period of six months, the Parties shall seek other means of peaceful settlement of the dispute.

ARTICLE XV

Without prejudice to Article XIV, within one month after the entry into force of this Agreement, the Parties shall withdraw, cancel or otherwise resolve any and all interstate claims, complaints, appeals, objections, proceedings and disputes filed in any legal forum relating to issues existing between the Parties prior to the signing of this Agreement, and shall not initiate such claims, complaints, appeals, objections, proceedings and shall not be involved in any way in any claims, complaints, appeals, objections, proceedings filed by any third party against the other Party.

The Parties shall not in any way carry out, encourage or engage in hostile actions against each other in the diplomatic, informational or other spheres that are contrary to this Agreement and shall hold regular consultations to this end.

ARTICLE XVI

This Agreement shall enter into force upon the exchange of instruments of notification of the completion of the internal procedures required by the national legislation of the Parties. This Agreement shall be registered in accordance with Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.

ARTICLE XVII

This Agreement is concluded in Armenian, Azerbaijani and English, all three texts being equally authentic. In the event of any dispute as to the meaning of any provision of any of the equally authentic texts, the English text shall prevail.


Date, place

source: commonspace.eu with the website of the Armenian Foreign Ministry, Yerevan

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Armenian prime minister opens first UK-Armenia Business Forum

Armenian prime minister opens first UK-Armenia Business Forum

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, opened the "Armenia–United Kingdom Business Forum 2026," which is being held in Yerevan for the first time. The Prime Minister Pashinyan delivered a speech and welcomed the attendees, emphasizing that holding the forum is a logical step following the signing of the memorandum establishing a strategic partnership between Armenia and the United Kingdom this May: "After establishing such a partnership, the primary question that arises for governments is: how do we turn that political will, expressed through adopted documents, into reality? And the most effective way to solve this problem is to make the political substance discussed between governments a part of everyday life. Conferences like this serve precisely that purpose: to fill the space opened up by governments with real life''. Turning to the economy and business, Nikol Pashinyan noted that experience shows that individuals unconstrained by the specific scope of governmental or other official duties are better at identifying opportunities and prospects. In this context, the country's leader expressed hope that the ideas raised during the conference discussions would advance to the next stage of development and materialize into concrete agreements. ''Overall, it is evident that the Republic of Armenia and our region are undergoing a transformation linked to the peace established between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the developments stemming from it. We are currently working on a daily basis to launch the implementation of the TRIPP project on the ground—an initiative that will undoubtedly serve as a cornerstone for transforming the economic landscape not only of the Republic of Armenia but of the entire region. It is already the case, as we are currently witnessing a certain level of investment-related activity surrounding Armenia; it is clear that this project will, in turn, generate new projects, and the investment appeal of Armenia and our region will strengthen," the Prime Minister said, adding that in the near future, alongside developments in the TRIPP project, the opening of the Armenia-Türkiye border is expected, as well as the opening of railway connections between Armenia and Azerbaijan and between Armenia and Türkiye. (Click image to read more),

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)