Armenia and Azerbaijan should sign and ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

In a speech in Strasbourg this week High Representative federica Morgherini spoke about the importance of the International Criminal Court. Her message is of particular importance in the Caucasus region

The situation in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone remains tense, with daily reports of violations of the cease fire. The number of casualties continues to increase, and the killing of civilians, including the death this week of a two-year old Azerbaijani girl, continues to be absolutely unacceptable. Both sides accuse each other of gross violations of international humanitarian law. Anecdotal evidence suggests that there have been cases of violations of international humanitarian law. The danger of renewed hostilities raises the spectre of future atrocities.

Given this, the international community should strongly urge Armenia and Azerbaijan to sign and ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The relevance of the work of the court was this week highlighted by EU High Representative, Federica Morgherini. Justice is the only effective and sustainable response to violence, and the European Union will continue to be a strong supporter of the International Criminal Court and the United Nations, Mogherini told Members of the European Parliament addressing in Strasbourg a debate on human rights violations in the context of war crimes, and crimes against humanity, including genocide.

The message of Mrs Morgherini to MEPs has particular relevance for the ongoing situation in the Caucasus, where unfortunately only Georgia has signed and ratified the Rome statute.

As was pointed out by Mrs Morgherini, crimes against humanity can spark the next war, propagate conflict, or the next refugee crises. In a conflict situation, war crimes make post-conflict reconciliation much harder to achieve and our work more difficult also in the post-conflict phase. They destroy the very fabric of society, they spread fear and mistrust, opening wounds that may take decades and a lot, a lot of work to heal." For these reasons, High Representative Federica Mogherini said, the EU must work to prevent and address human rights violations as a matter of humanity and values, but also because doing so "is also a matter of interests and strategy".

The EU focuses strongly on prevention, including through early warning and by working closely with security forces in our partner countries, building their capabilities and training them on the respect of human rights. Last year alone, the European Union's aid for the prevention and response just to sexual and gender-based violence reached almost 3.5 million women, men, girls and boys.

But when crimes are committed, "we have a duty to address their consequences", said the High Representative. "And justice is the only effective and sustainable response to such violence. Because impunity generates more hatred, it often leads to revenge and to more suffering. So, justice is for us the only way towards reconciliation and sustainable peace."

The EU supports initiatives around the world to promote criminal justice, reparations, truth-seeking and institutional reforms - including in Syria, Iraq, Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The EU also strongly supports the International Criminal Court, including with EUR 37 million in direct support since 2000, as well as with intense diplomatic activity to promote the universal ratification of the Rome Statute which underpins the Court.

"There is, there will be, and there cannot be any doubt about the EU's full support to multilateral global governance, based on international law, on human rights, and on strong international institutions", said Mogherini. "The European Union will continue to be a strong, reliable and indispensable partner for the UN, and for all who believe that violence must be met with justice, and reconciliation."

This is a message that needs to be repeated clearly and often in the Caucasus region.

The full speech of HR Federica Morgherini at the European parliament is available here

Source: commonspace.eu with the press service of the European External Action Service

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)