Arif Yunusov: Safarov factor allowed Azerbaijani authorities to engineer a campaign of spread-eagle speeches and gain political dividends

 One should not exaggerate the impact of Ramil Safarov's pardon on the Armenian-Azerbaijani relations given that there was no serious political dialogue between the two countries. Consequently, it is senseless speaking of its continuation or suspension. Arif Yunusov, Head of the Conflict Studies and Migration Department of the Institute for Peace and Democracy, made such statement to ArmInfo when commenting on the possible consequences of Ramnil Safarov's pardon.

"One can speak of certain dialogue of the civil societies, which is fading away year by year. The negotiations for resolution of the Karabakh conflict faced deadlock yet long ago. There is imitation of negotiations and the parties to the conflict do not really want to resolve the conflict. It is obvious that the parties must go on a compromise to resolve the conflict, while neither of the parties wants to do it.  Sometimes, they speak of a desire to achieve fair pace, but each of them means peace in its favor. Each party is sure that time works in its favor. Armenians think that the world and Azerbaijan, first of all, will sooner or later resign mind to the fact that Karabakh is outside Azerbaijan. The later, in turn, is sure that Armenia's economy is becoming weaker and weaker and it is necessary to wait for the right time and keep arming," the Azerbaijani political expert.

Therefore, he said, the authorities of both the countries have been imitating negotiations over the last years as the superpowers wanted so in order to prevent resumption of military actions. The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs are well aware that there is no progress in the negotiations, but they still visit the region for the sake of decency, promise something to Armenians and Azerbaijanis, though they do not believe in their own promises. They have become like political tourists rather than mediators. In such situation, Yunusov said, Safarov case has played its role inside Azerbaijan and Armenia, putting aside the morality.  Safarov factor allowed Azerbaijani authorities and political forces to engineer a campaign of spread-eagle speeches and gain political dividends.  In Armenia the authorities and political forces also tried to use Safarov factor to gain political dividends. This factor will be used in both the countries for a long time, he said.

Yunusov believes that exchange of fire in the conflict zone will become more frequent and intensive, but they will not spiral into something more serious, for both the parties are well aware that they are not key players in this issue. 

"Hence, the parties to the Karabakh conflict have nothing to do but make propaganda campaigns inside their countries, in the region and at international structures. Nothing else.  The negotiations will fade away for some months, indeed. Afterwards, the political tourists from the Minsk Group will again visit the region. Another matter that civil societies of both the countries should not yield to the spread eagle speeches and should keep working on establishment of dialogue. The only alternative is war," Yunusov said.

Earlier on August 31 the Armenian authorities adopted a decision to suspend diplomatic relations and official contacts with Hungary. President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan made public the decision at a special meeting with the heads of diplomatic missions on Friday after the Hungarian authorities extradited Azeri officer Ramil Safarov, who was sentenced by a Hungarian court to life in jail for killing sleeping Armenian officer Gurgen Margaryan with an axe in Budapest in 2004. Both the officers were undergoing an English language course under the NATO PfP program. The same day after Safarov's extradition,
Azeri President Ilham Aliyev decreed to pardon the criminal. According to Hungarian Mass Media, Azerbaijan pledged to purchase Hungarian government bonds in the amount of 2-3 billion EUR.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)