ALIEV-SARGSYAN SUMMIT BEFORE CHRISTMAS. A face to face meeting between the two leaders is a positive development

President Ilham Aliev of Azerbaijan and President Serzh Sargsyan of Armenia will hold a summit meeting before the end of the year in a further attempt to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Diplomats from France, Russia and the United States who met the Foreign Ministers of the two countries in New York on Friday said that they will travel to the region in November to prepare for the meeting. Aliev and Sargsyan held a number of face to face meetings in the period between November 2008 and January 2011. Most of these meetings were facilitated by the then Russian President Dimitri Medvedev. The talks however failed to achieve a breakthrough and the two sides have in the last two years often communicated through what is sometimes referred to as "megaphone diplomacy" - namely through statements in the mass media which often were anything but diplomatic.

In a statement posted on the website of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) it was stated that in New York the diplomats and the Ministers "continued discussions on the substance of the peace process" The representatives of France, United States and Russia "stressed the commitment of their three countries to support the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict based on the non-use of force or the threat of force, territorial integrity, and equal rights and self-determination of peoples. They also referred to the statement of their three Presidents on June 18, 2013, "with special attention to the appeal to the sides to refrain from any actions or rhetoric that could raise tension in the region and lead to escalation of the conflict." The Ministers on their part reiterated their determination to continue working with the diplomats "to reach a peaceful settlement of the conflict". France, Russia and the United States co-Chair the so-called "Minsk Process", a mechanism mandated by the international community to help the negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "a summit before Christmas is now expedient for both the Armenian and the Azerbaijani Presidents. Presidential elections are due in Azerbaijan on October 9, and although the re-election of President Aliev is assured the process has already proven more messy than the Azerbaijani government would have wished, and the next weeks are likely to see Azerbaijan under increasing international criticism. On the other hand President Sargsyan international reputation was seriously dented by his abrupt decision in August to abandon plans for closer co-operation with the European Union and to join instead the Russian sponsored Customs Union. A "peace summit" in the next weeks in which the two Presidents will be seen acting in a statesman-like fashion will work well for both sides. It may however easily be a whitewash unless well prepared.

However even allowing for a healthy doze of cynicism, a face to face meeting between the two leaders is a positive development, and the diplomats of the Minsk Group co-Chair countries are right to make most of the opportunity.Both Presidents are expected to attend the Vilnius Summit of the EU leaders and the Eastern Partnership  countries at the end of November. An Armenian-Azerbaijani summit in Vilnius may be problematic for the Russians who have been doing their best to undermine the Eastern Partnership meeting, but an opportunity around the same time, or shortly afterwards may emerge, possibly in connection with a meeting of the CIS."

source: commonspace.eu.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)