Senior Azerbaijani officials evaluates the results of the Kazan summit

Head of the Foreign Relations Department of the Presidential Administration of Azerbaijan Novruz Mammadov spoke on the outcome of the meeting of Presidents of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, held in Kazan.
 
"I want to point out that the Armenian side once again uses the situation around the negotiation process for their own gain, accusing Azerbaijan of thwarting the adoption of guidelines, thus misleading the world community. However, I have to note that the negotiation process continues, as Azerbaijan is interested in peaceful settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh problem and has repeatedly demonstrated its will in this matter. For many years Azerbaijan has been the party ensuring peace in the region. The political will of the Azerbaijani leadership and its President has been directed at continuation of the peace talks and at finding a peaceful solution to the conflict for all those years. Those officials in Armenia, who claim that they supposedly are making efforts to prevent the resumption of hostilities, simply engaged in deceiving the international community.


Prior to the talks in Kazan the international community and mediators voiced optimistic messages of that core principles for the settlement of the conflict may be adopted at this meeting. Despite the fact that the basic principles in Kazan have not been adopted, it was decided to continue negotiations. During the talks in Kazan, Azerbaijan, whose territory remains under occupation, and more than a million people are still unable to return to their homes, was to voice its stance on this issue. Armenia, unfortunately, as in previous years began to accuse Azerbaijan of being the cause of failure in the negotiations. Everyone knows that Armenia frustrated the agreements reached in Athens, and in St. Petersburg.

It arrived in Sochi with its ready project which was not at all coordinated with the mediators. Armenia is used to playing tricks. Unfortunately, the Armenian Foreign Ministry continues this. Negotiations are hard to move forward, but we will continue insisting on our positions and principles, despite the actions of the Armenian side. Azerbaijani territories are occupied, over a million of Azerbaijan are refugees, which is why our President is doing everything possible to find solution to this conflict. I have to repeat that despite no definite agreements were reached in Kazan, it is necessary to stress the role of Russian President Dmitriy Medvedev who continues efforts to solve the conflict.

As for what prompts Armenia to frustrate negotiations, Mammadov said this question really needs an answer.

“I think that given the sensitivity of the current stage of the negotiation process, it would be improper to make any comments. But I suppose that our journalists, political scientists and experts, while closely analyzing the established situation, would guess easily who backs Armenia. A complex negotiation process is carried on and the president of the country makes titanic effort to solve this conflict. As is known, the attention of the world community to this problem has increased. Just ahead of the meeting in Kazan, President of Azerbaijan had a phone call with his US counterpart Barack Obama, received a personal message from President Nicholas Sarkozy of France. It means that the world community is watching the negotiation process closely. For this reason, we have to take the steps to promote the resolution of the conflict but not to hamper the negotiation process”, he said.

report compiled by 1news.az

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)