Searching for the right fit. The discussions in Paris on the resolution of the Karabakh conflict have been positively assessed by participants.

President Francois Hollande of France on Monday hosted a series of meetings at the Elysee Palace with the hope of unblocking the impasse in the negotiations for the resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflıct. There were bilateral meetings between Hollande and his two main guests - Armenian President Serzh Sarrgsyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev. Aliev and Sargsyan also met separately and the three Presidents also had a trilateral meeting. There was then an expanded meeting between the two Presidents and their officials and the co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Process who are mandated to facilitate a solution to the conflict.

Although details of the meetings remain sparce all the sides have welcomed it as a positive development. However the Armenian and Azerbaijani positions remain too rigid and too far apart for progress to be expected quıckly. Part of the problem that the Paris meetings have tried to deal with is finding the right fit for a process to move the negotiations forward. Who sits around the table and how, and to discuss what, remains an issue, and despite all the ingenuity of French diplomacy one that is not yet fully resolved. The sides must now however go down to substance. The extent to which Paris has been able to achieve this objective will become clear in the next weeks and months. At that point the world will judge if this has been a ground breaking meeting, or a worthwhile and well intentioned initiative with only cosmetic results.

spurce: commonspace.eu

phto: President Hollande of France with President Sargsyan of Armenia and President Aliev of Azerbaijan at the Elysee Palace on Monday, 27 October 2014.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Lebanon's parliament has voted to abolish the death penalty, a move that would make it the first country in the Middle East to formally end capital punishment. A majority of MPs in the 128-seat parliament backed the measure on Tuesday (11 August), while Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc voted against it. The legislation will now go to the cabinet before being passed to President Joseph Aoun for signing. The government has already expressed its support for the measure. Lebanon has not carried out an execution since January 2004, although courts have continued to hand down death sentences. Rights groups estimate that more than 78 people remain on death row. Under the new legislation, capital punishment will be replaced with life imprisonment with hard labour. However, the legislation does not yet set out in detail how the new sentence would be enforced. Hard labour is already written into Lebanese law but has rarely been implemented in recent years. The country's financial crisis and overcrowded prisons have limited the authorities' resources and capacity. The latest legislation follows years of campaigning by civil society groups and lawyers for the removal of capital punishment from Lebanese law. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)