Remembering the 1992 Khojaly Massacre - an editorial comment

In the modern history of the Caucasus region there are many examples of pain and suffering caused by conflict and ethnic strife. The events in Khojaly in 1992 stand out both for their cruelty, as well as for the fact that they happened on the eve of the 21st century, when information travelled fast, and the world had no excuses that it did know what was going on.

On the night of 25-26 February 1992 hundreds of Azerbaijani civilians, including women and children were killed as they were trying to leave from the town of Khojaly, that was just about to fall under Armenian occupation. Foreign journalists that visited the scene soon after speak about dozens of bodies littering the roads. It remains one of the most tragic chapters of the long and bloody Karabakh conflict. The anniversary of the massacre is marked not only in Azerbaijan but also among many communities world-wide.

The massacre was documented by a number of human rights organisations, including Human Rights Watch and Memorial, as well as a number of journalists, some of who wrote graphic reports about it in the mainstream western and Russian media.

Some Armenian sources justify what happened in Khojaly, claiming that armed men were hiding among the civilians fleeing Khojaly. But others accept that the Khojaly massacre was an act of revenge against earlier killings of Armenian civilians in Azerbaijan. 

Civilian populations, both Azerbaijani and Armenian, remain captive of the Karabakh conflict. They suffer both as a result of the fighting that erupts regularly, but beyond that hundreds of thousands remain displaced, and communities in the conflict zone live in constant fear.

The world must remember Khojaly in order to ensure that it will never happen again to any community regardless of its ethnicity. The governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan should also take steps in this direction by signing and ratifying the statutes of the International Criminal Court to make it possible to prosecute those who commit similar atrocities in the future. The international community should increase its efforts to bring about a resolution of the Karabakh conflict, and open a new chapter of hope for the people of the region. In that way the victims of Khojaly would not have died in vaiin.

This comment was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)