Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons of the thematic groups for Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue, say Washington meeting was a historic moment

Statement

Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons

of the thematic groups for Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue

Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace

Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons of the thematic groups for Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue, in a statement, welcome the meeting in Washington DC between Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, and Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev, with the facilitation of US President Donald Trump, and the initialling of a peace agreement, and the signing of a joint declaration, by the two countries.

The statement was signed by the Co-Chair of the Thematic Group on Peace and Security, Murad Muradov (Azerbaijan)and Leonid Nersisyan (Armenia); Chair of the Group on Gender and Equality, Lala Jumayeva (Azerbaijan), Deputy Chair of the Group on Gender and Equality, Andranik Shirinyan (Armenia), Chair of the Group on Governance, Sargis Harutyunyan (Armenia); Deputy Chair of the Group on Governance, Ramazan  Samadov (Azerbaijan); Chair of the Group on Connectivity, Narek Minasyan (Armenia); Deputy Chair of the Group on Connectivity, Nigar Gurbanli (Azerbaijan); and Chair of the Group on Environment: Fidan Namazova (Azerbaijan).

The Statement was also signed by LINKS Europe South Caucasus Co-ordinator, George Simonishvili.

The statement added:

Armenia and Azerbaijan have been at war for decades, and so this was a historic moment for Armenia and Azerbaijan, and for the South Caucasus region.

Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons of the thematic groups for Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue thank the president, government and people of the United States for hosting and facilitating the meeting, and all the others who over the last three years have contributed towards the dialogue between Armenia and Azerbaijan in their difficult journey towards peace, not only by working with the two governments, but also by supporting people to people contacts. This work must now continue, and be intensified.

We are encouraged by the commitment expressed by both sides in Washington, and reaffirm our dedication to contributing to this process. We also remain mindful of the many challenges that lie ahead. As we move forward, we will continue to listen to diverse perspectives, promote mutual understanding, and support initiatives that prepare Armenians and Azerbaijanis for a peaceful and cooperative future.

We were inspired by the mood of the meeting in Washington DC, and by what was discussed and agreed by the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan. This stimulates us to take our work forward. We are conscious that in many ways now, there are both opportunities and challenges ahead. Armenians and Azerbaijanis must be ready for the future.

The thematic groups for Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue are an initiative of LINKS Europe, supported by the European Union’s EU4Peace III programme. In the framework of this initiative over one hundred Armenian and Azerbaijanis have since January 2025, engaged is an intensive dialogue focusing on five themes: Peace and Security; Gender and Equality; Governance; Connectivity and Environment. The Groups are working on five reports, which they hope to finish in ten weeks’ time, that will outline a vision for Armenian-Azerbaijani peace, co-existence and co-operation up to 2040. Meetings have been held in person and on line, and will continue until the end of October 2025. The reports are expected to be published in November.

We, Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons of the thematic groups for Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue stand ready to support the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan as they pursue the path to peace, and will also continue our work to contribute to dialogue, peace and reconciliation in the South Caucasus.

Signed:            

Co-Chair of the Thematic Group on Peace and Security

Murad Muradov (Azerbaijan)

Leonid Nersisyan (Armenia)

Chair of the Group on Gender and Equality

Lala Jumayeva (Azerbaijan)

Deputy Chair of the Group on Gender and Equality

Andranik Shirinyan (Armenia)

Chair of the Group on Governance

Sargis Harutyunyan (Armenia)

Deputy Chair of the Group on Governance

Ramazan  Samadov (Azerbaijan)

Chair of the Group on Connectivity

Narek Minasyan (Armenia)

Deputy Chair of the Group on Connectivity

Nigar Gurbanli (Azerbaijan)

Chair of the Group on Environment

Fidan Namazova (Azerbaijan)

 LINKS Europe South Caucasus Co-ordinator

George Simonishvili

Baku and Yerevan

source: commonspace.eu with LINKS Europe

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)