Opinion: Uzbekistan’s former first daughter back in the limelight as new government seeks to repatriate missing millions

The first confirmed communication since 2014 with former President's daughter comes from a Swiss lawyer

by Gideon Wakefield

Gulnara Karimova's spectacular fall from grace, from Uzbekistan's heir apparent to isolated prisoner in her own home, was one of the most tumultuous events in Uzbek politics before the death of her father, Islam Karimov, in September last year. Rumours about her fate had swirled around the media since 2014, when she was last seen in public. In a new twist, she was recently questioned by Swiss prosecutors at her home in Tashkent over charges of money laundering involving telecommunications licenses in Uzbekistan.

Once Uzbekistan's ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, a businesswoman, and a budding popstar (under her alter ego Googoosha), Karimova was tipped to succeed her father, as the country's next leader. In 2013, however, she fell out of favour with her family in a rift that began with revelations of a feud with her sister, Lola Karimova-Tillyaeva.

After falling out with the rest of her family, the Uzbek government confirmed that she had been placed under house arrest when pictures emerged of her arguing with security guards at her house in Tashkent. At that time, she was being investigated by Uzbek authorities on corruption charges - the common accusation level at those who fall foul of the regime.

In the years since her arrest, numerous rumours of Karimova's whereabouts have circulated, fuelled by Twitter accounts claiming to be her, claims that she had been placed in a psychiatric hospital, or even that she was poisoned. Yet the latest revelations confirm that all these rumours were false.

Geneva-based lawyer Grégoire Mangeat gave an interview (in German) to Swiss newspaper NZZ confirming that she was a client, and that he had met with her in December. On December 9th and 10th, she was interviewed by Swiss prosecutors in relation to charges of money laundering.

The case involves apparent bribes taken by Karimova for the granting of 3G licenses to two European telecommunications companies (VimpelCom and TeliaSonera) in 2007. The Swiss authorities have frozen accounts containing 800 million Swiss francs relating to the case.

Questions about such corruption began to be asked in 2012, and it is not clear what role the public accusations against Karimova played in the collapse of her relationship with her father. Investigations in the US, Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, France and the Netherlands all examined the use of shell companies, controlled by Karimova, to take bribes.

Despite being implicated in this scandal for many years, it has never before been confirmed that she was questioned in relation to this activity. Now, however, for 23 hours over two days, she certainly has.

During her father's reign, any information about or communication with Karimova was tightly controlled. Under his successor, Shavkat Mirzoyoyev, she remains under house arrest, but, for the first time, has been able to speak with someone outside the country - her lawyer. In his interview, Mangeat said that she is in good health, but expressed concern for her safety and her ability to see her children. Most interesting for Tashkent watchers, though, was the suggestion that she had been coerced into a particular testimony by threat or actual use of violence against her.

It appears that Mirzoyoyev's government is attempting to recover and repatriate the funds lost to Karimova's corruption - something her father never attempted. In Uzbekistan, where hard currency is scarce and economic crisis continues to bite, the government needs all the funds it can get. Using (and possibly torturing) the deceased president's estranged daughter to get hold of it should not surprise even the most elementary student of Uzbek politics. It is yet to be seen if this is the start of a wider purge of the Karimov family, whose other financial and commercial interests in Uzbekistan remain substantial.

Gideon Wakefield is a researcher and journalist focussing on the former Soviet Union, currently based at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva. He contributed this op-ed to commonspace.eu.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.