Commentary: GCC leaders will meet this week to seek a unified approach to tackle many challenges ahead

In the last weeks it became clear that the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) - the grouping of the six monarchies in the Gulf, was looking to solidify its strength and unity in the face of new economic, security and health challenges. The major obstacle was the dispute within the group, namely the standoff between Qatar on the one hand and Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and UAE on the other, which has been ongoing for nearly four years

After intensive efforts by Kuwait, supported by the United States, the Qatar crisis appears to be on the way of being resolved and the GCC leaders summit, which takes place in Saudi Arabia this week will likely close this chapter, at least for now. Having survived many economic and security challenges, the GCC is keen to emerge from this week's summit a more united bloc. The unity and strength of the GCC is a much-needed force in the region, especially since the United States is signalling it may not sustain its strategic support going forward.  

The GCC, known officially as, Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf, has existed since 1981 when all countries of the Arabian peninsula and the Gulf except for Iraq and Yemen signed the Charter launching a regional intergovernmental organisation. The GCC had since lived through many political and security experiences. Situated geographically between Asia, Africa and Europe, the GCC has been an important partner for many countries across these three continents. At the turn of the 21st century, the GCC leaders decided to create a customs union, a common market and a common currency. The bloc achieved major economic feats leading to a free and uninterrupted transfer of goods and persons but the goal of a monetary union is not yet realised. Perhaps the greatest achievement of the bloc was the development of its own social, educational and human capital.  

The importance of healing the rift with Qatar was clearly highlighted by the Secretary-General of the GCC, Nayef Falah M. Al-Hajraf, who was appointed just before the Coronavirus pandemic.  

In an interview with the Saudi TV Channel, Al Akhbariya, Al-Hajraf said that the GCC was born out of challenges and is capable of tackling contemporary challenges. Al-Hajraf highlighted the great desire of members states for this week's summit to be held in full attendance - in other words for the Qatari Emir to be present .

At the time of the GCC founding In 1981, the Gulf region was facing two major events: the Iranian revolution followed by the Iraq-Iran war; the GCC also experienced another war even closer when Iraq attacked Kuwait. Soon after, the rise of Al-Qaeda once again threatened the stability of the region. The GCC was able to preserve its unity and build a voice of reason as it succeeded to maintain security and economic order in the Gulf. Moreover, the GCC was able to highlight its importance given the location and the wealth of energy resources it has. In his interview Al-Hajraf also noted that the GCC was able to have global impact through its established investment and international development programmes. GCC’s total financial value, in fact, constitutes 8.1 per cent of the total financial value of the capital markets in Europe. 

Going forward, the GCC will likely keep economic growth and cooperation at the forefront of its goals. The GCC minister for transport met last month to discuss plans for a Gulf railway network and launched an agency to supervise the efforts. The GCC also seeks to establish an infectious disease centre that can monitor and prepare for future epidemics. The summit will highlight many of the future plans. With Qatar rejoining the ranks, the GCC will once again be able to showcase itself as an exemplary model for cooperation despite the differences within it.

Source: This commentary was prepared by Noman Ahmed, Research Associate at LINKS Europe

Photo: The founding fathers of the GCC at their inaugural summit of 1981. 
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)