Rubio and Lavrov discuss Ukraine

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met in Manila today (Jul 23) for their first face-to-face talks since September, using the sidelines of the meetings of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to discuss the war in Ukraine and broader U.S.-Russia relations. The meeting lasted about 30 minutes and came hours after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky held talks with U.S. envoys aimed at, in his words, "revitalizing diplomacy."

According to the U.S. State Department, Rubio and Lavrov discussed bilateral relations and "the need to end the Russia-Ukraine war." Neither diplomat made public remarks before the meeting, and Russia did not immediately release its own account. Afterward, Lavrov declined to answer reporters' questions.

Speaking a day earlier in Manila, Rubio confirmed that Ukraine would be a central topic. He argued that the conflict had "impeded the ability of Russia and the U.S. to find areas of agreement" and reiterated that Washington wants the war to end. Rubio said the United States remains prepared to play "a constructive role" in facilitating a settlement should an opportunity arise. He also acknowledged that diplomatic efforts had "fallen off" in recent months but suggested that changing circumstances could create space for renewed discussions. Rubio added that some conversations with Moscow would remain confidential to improve prospects for progress.

Lavrov, for his part, said before the meeting that the talks would be worthwhile regardless of the outcome, stating that "it is better to ask questions and get answers." He also indicated he intended to ask Rubio about U.S. President Donald Trump's recent remarks that a settlement in Ukraine was "closer than people realize."

During the meeting, Rubio and Lavrov also addressed broader bilateral issues, including differing interpretations of understandings reached during the August 2025 summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska. Moscow has argued that the talks produced understandings on Ukraine that remain valid, while Washington has disputed that any formal agreements on the country's territorial future were reached. 

When it comes to peace talks, Russia has long maintained demands that Ukraine cedes territory, while President Zelensky has reiterated on Wednesday (July 22) in a post on X that "peace is necessary – peace with dignity – and Ukraine has long been ready for it."

Beyond Ukraine, Rubio said the two sides would explore other areas where Washington and Moscow might cooperate, despite significant disagreements. He stressed that maintaining dialogue remains important, noting that the United States and Russia are the world's two largest nuclear powers. The ministers' discussions also occurred as ASEAN foreign ministers addressed other regional and international security issues, including the Middle East and tensions in the South China Sea.

Source: commonspace.eu with AP News (New York), Kyiv Post (Kyiv), and Sud Ouest (Bordeaux).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)