A monastery that has become a flashpoint

Commentary

On Monday, 15 July, yet another incident occurred in the vicinity of the David Gareji Monastery which lies on a disputed area of the Georgian-Azerbaijani border.  The monastery has turned from a place of worship to a flashpoint, with Georgian religious zealots trying to state their claim on the land as Georgian territory, and Azerbaijani border guards stopping them.

This story has been ongoing since the collapse of the USSR in 1991, when a somewhat loose delineation of the borders between various Soviet republics became unsustainable. Georgia and Azerbaijan have since worked on this issue and much of the border between the two countries is now defined and agreed. Some spots, such as the area around the monastery, remain in dispute.

Georgian-Azerbaijani relations have traditionally been warm, at times even exemplary. But this border dispute has all the ingredients for turning the relationship sour. And it seems that there are those who want to do that.

After yesterday's incident both Georgia and Azerbaijan issued statements, which emphasised the Georgian-Azerbaijani strategic partnership and relationship. Both governments want to resolve the issue through negotiations. Yet the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry felt it had to further dramatise the manner by formally summoning the Georgian Ambassador. The statement of the Georgian Ministry appears more conciliatory, with an appeal for restraint.

It is very likely that radicals in Georgia are trying to turn the David Gareji issue into a crisis. If this is the case they need to be condemned. It is also possible however that some officials in Azerbaijan may be overreacting. They also need to be restrained. Both Azerbaijan and Georgia should respect the border delineations that they have already agreed, and move speedily but deligently to resolve what has not. There are already too many disputes and problems in the South Caucasus. A dispute between Azerbaijan and Georgia is neither necessary, nor inevitable, nor in anyone's interest.

source: commonspace.eu 

image: The David Gareji Monastery complex on the disputed Azerbaijan-Georgian border

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)