Military in Burkina Faso plan a three year transition to civilian rule

A national conference in Burkina Faso has authorised the ruling military junta to organise the transition period leading to a return to constitutional order and civilian rule within three years.

Thus, Lieutenant-Colonel Paul-Henri Damiba, who ousted the elected president Roch Marc Kabore on the 24 January coup d’état, is expected to rule the country for the next three years until elections are held.

Lieutenant-Colonel Damiba will finally be sworn in as Head of State tomorrow (2 March) by an assembly gathering the junta, different opposition parties and trade unions, some civil society organisations as well as people displaced by the jihadist attacks that have hit Burkina Faso since 2015.

However, the charter approved on Tuesday  (1 March) states that the new interim president or his government members will not be eligible to run for the next presidential, legislative and municipal elections that will be organised at the end of the transition period. The transitional government will consist of 25 ministers and a 71-member parliament.

The decision could put the West African country on a collision course with international partners who had called for a swift return to constitutional order following a coup that was widely supported by the population as the former president was considered incapable of containing the growing violence of Islamist militants in the country.

Indeed, Burkina Faso was suspended by the 15-member Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union following the coup. ECOWAS subsequently asked the new military junta to present a "reasonable timetable for the restoration of constitutional order". Discussions should therefore be initiated quickly between these regionall organisations and Burkina Faso to determine whether a three-year transition period is acceptable.

Although ECOWAS has not yet imposed financial sanctions against Burkina Faso whilst the latter's neighbour Mali is subject to economic sanctions that have forced Bamako to pay more than $100 million in interest and capital payments on its debt.

In a region that has experienced more than four coups in 18 months - with two successive ones in Mali, one in Guinea, and recently one in Burkina Faso - the length of transitions is at the heart of negotiations between the countries affected by the coups and ECOWAS. Deemed "unacceptable" by ECOWAS for being too lengthy, the five-year transition proposed by Mali was not accepted by the institution.

Once a region that had a reputation as the continent's "coup belt”, West Africa has been weakened by the numerous attacks perpetrated by armed militants linked to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State who have killed more than 2,000 people and caused the displacement of more than 1.5 million citizens.

By appropriating swathes of territory, the terrorists have succeeded in instilling fear in the West African populations, who are now demanding and supporting political change that is militarily capable of pushing Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State from their territory.

The new interim President Damiba stated that his main transitional tasks were the “fight against terrorism and the restoration of the national territory” as well as the strengthening of governance through the “fight against corruption”.

The government is therefore expected to satisfy the security needs of his frightened population while respecting the transitional deadlines demanded by Burkina Faso's international partners.

 

Sources: Commonspace.eu with Reuters (London), Le Monde (Paris) and Al Jazeera (Doha)
Picture : Burkina Faso's new interim President Paul-Henri Damiba signs a charter requiring him to organise elections within three years ; Twitter: @actu_salade

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)