Mark Rutte presents the Secretary General's Annual Report 2025

At NATO headquarters in Brussels on Thursday (26 March), Secretary General Mark Rutte presented the Secretary General's Annual Report 2025, saying NATO had adapted to a more dangerous security environment marked by Russia’s war against Ukraine, growing hybrid threats, China’s military build-up, and the continuing danger from terrorism. In his opening remarks, Rutte said 2025 had been “a landmark year for NATO”.

Rutte said the report showed that all 32 allies met the long-standing 2% of GDP defence spending benchmark in 2025, the first time this had happened since the target was agreed in 2014. He added that European allies and Canada increased defence spending by 20% in real terms compared with 2024, and said NATO was now “stronger today than it has ever been”.

A central theme of Rutte’s presentation was the decision taken at the 2025 Hague summit to raise defence investment to 5% of GDP. NATO’s official summit declaration specified that this commitment is to be reached by 2035, with 3.5% allocated to core defence requirements and 1.5% to broader security-related investments. Rutte said the decision reflected the need for “ a stronger, fairer and more lethal NATO”, and argued that allies must now match higher spending with greater defence production and innovation.

On Russia, Rutte said Moscow remained “the most significant and direct threat” to Euro-Atlantic security. He pointed to Russian airspace violations, sabotage, cyber activity, political interference, and threats to undersea infrastructure. He said damage to critical infrastructure had prompted the creation of Baltic Sentry, while Russian drone violations over Poland in September led to the launch of Eastern Sentry along the eastern flank from the High North to the Black Sea.

Rutte also stressed that support for Ukraine remained central to NATO’s work. He said allies provided the overwhelming majority of military assistance to Ukraine in 2025, opened the Joint Analysis, Training and Education Centre (JATEC) in Poland in February 2025, and launched the Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List, or PURL, in summer 2025 to channel billions of euros’ worth of American military equipment to Kyiv, funded by allies and partners. His remarks came as The Washington Post reported that the Pentagon is considering redirecting some Ukraine-bound military aid to the Middle East.

Responding to a question, he argued that US pressure had accelerated European defence spending. Rutte said that without Trump, many large economies “would not have reached” the 2% benchmark, and credited Washington with reopening a diplomatic deadlock to end the war in Ukraine.

He faced several difficult questions on Iran and his comments backing the US-Israeli operation. On the Middle East, Rutte said that the alliance has long agreed that Iran must not obtain nuclear weapons, and warned that Tehran’s missile programme poses an increasing threat to the region and beyond. He added that allies are working with partners to ensure the security of key maritime routes like the Strait of Hormuz. Responding to criticism that he had overstepped his role, Rutte said differences of opinion among allies were normal, but insisted that NATO remained united on the core issues of Iran’s nuclear ambitions and missile capabilities.

On Ukraine’s future, Rutte avoided framing the country as part of NATO’s defence structure, but reaffirmed that Kyiv remains on a path towards eventual membership. He said that, in the meantime, allies are working to define post-war security guarantees once a ceasefire or peace agreement is reached.

Source: commonspace.eu, reporting on Secretary General Rutte’s presentation on Thursday (26 March).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)