Germany questions its continued involvement in Mali operations

Germany is the latest European country to question its military deployment in Mali following 

On Wednesday (2 February), Foreign Minister Annalen Baerbock, asked whether the conditions for a successful mission are still in place.

The German military mission, as part of a European task force is the largest deployment of German troops abroad.

However countries deploying troops are now questioning the intentions of the Malian government, who initially was very supportive of the deployment. At present he Bundeswehr needs the permission of the Malian government 36 hours in advance to use its drones and NH 90 helicopters in the fight against terrorism on Malian territory. On 19 January, Mali denied a German military aircraft with 75 soldiers on board access to its airspace. These restrictions can negatively affect the ability of German troops to carry out the mission, and they are straining relations between the two countries. 

Last week, the Malian transitional authorities ordered the return of Danish special forces to Copenhagen and expelled the French ambassador to Mali from the country on Monday (31 January).

The renewal of the mandate of German now seems uncertain. Germany currently has 1,300 troops in Mali as part of an EU training mission (EUTM) and the UN peacekeeping mission MINUSMA . 

Recently the malian military government announced that they no longer intend to organise elections in February suggesting instead they will be held in five years time. The announcement prompted a sharp reaction from Agnieszka Brugger, spokesperson for the Green Party which is party of the governing coalition in Germany, who repeated that a return to constitutional order is a precondition for the international community's engagement in Mali.

Despite the troops and funds invested by European countries to help Mali fight the Islamist insurgents, they remain active on the borders of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, and attacks seem to be increasing. Last November, a terrorist attack killed more than 50 soldiers in Burkina Faso. This event shook the country and united the soldiers and people of Burkina Faso around the lack of resources given to the army and the military mismanagement of President-elect Kaboré, which eventually led to his downfall in the army coup last week.

In a related development, the European Union called on the Malian authorities to show "restraint" rather than "repeat unacceptable behaviour towards its European partners". In a statement issued by the spokesperson, Nabila Massrali, of the Council of the EU, the EU calls on the Malian transitional authorities to "de-escalate by on Wednesday (2 February) referred to the earlier expulsion of the French Ambassador, adding:

The European Union, which is fully committed to peace and stability in the Sahel, at the request of the States and in support of the people, expresses its support for and solidarity with France and deeply regrets the decision of the Malian transitional authorities. The European Union calls on the Malian authorities to show restraint rather than repeat unacceptable behaviour towards its European partners, such as Denmark, whose contingent has just been the subject of a decision to return it on unfounded grounds.

The European Union also recalled its solidarity with the positions taken by the ECOWAS [Economic Community of West African States] and said that the adoption of restrictive measures against those who are obstructing the completion of the political transition in Mali is being finalised.

 

sources: commonspace.eu with DW News, Reuters, the press service of the European Council and other media outlets
photo: Soldiers from a German detachment of MINUSMA during a patrol on the road

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)