Germany questions its continued involvement in Mali operations

Germany is the latest European country to question its military deployment in Mali following 

On Wednesday (2 February), Foreign Minister Annalen Baerbock, asked whether the conditions for a successful mission are still in place.

The German military mission, as part of a European task force is the largest deployment of German troops abroad.

However countries deploying troops are now questioning the intentions of the Malian government, who initially was very supportive of the deployment. At present he Bundeswehr needs the permission of the Malian government 36 hours in advance to use its drones and NH 90 helicopters in the fight against terrorism on Malian territory. On 19 January, Mali denied a German military aircraft with 75 soldiers on board access to its airspace. These restrictions can negatively affect the ability of German troops to carry out the mission, and they are straining relations between the two countries. 

Last week, the Malian transitional authorities ordered the return of Danish special forces to Copenhagen and expelled the French ambassador to Mali from the country on Monday (31 January).

The renewal of the mandate of German now seems uncertain. Germany currently has 1,300 troops in Mali as part of an EU training mission (EUTM) and the UN peacekeeping mission MINUSMA . 

Recently the malian military government announced that they no longer intend to organise elections in February suggesting instead they will be held in five years time. The announcement prompted a sharp reaction from Agnieszka Brugger, spokesperson for the Green Party which is party of the governing coalition in Germany, who repeated that a return to constitutional order is a precondition for the international community's engagement in Mali.

Despite the troops and funds invested by European countries to help Mali fight the Islamist insurgents, they remain active on the borders of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, and attacks seem to be increasing. Last November, a terrorist attack killed more than 50 soldiers in Burkina Faso. This event shook the country and united the soldiers and people of Burkina Faso around the lack of resources given to the army and the military mismanagement of President-elect Kaboré, which eventually led to his downfall in the army coup last week.

In a related development, the European Union called on the Malian authorities to show "restraint" rather than "repeat unacceptable behaviour towards its European partners". In a statement issued by the spokesperson, Nabila Massrali, of the Council of the EU, the EU calls on the Malian transitional authorities to "de-escalate by on Wednesday (2 February) referred to the earlier expulsion of the French Ambassador, adding:

The European Union, which is fully committed to peace and stability in the Sahel, at the request of the States and in support of the people, expresses its support for and solidarity with France and deeply regrets the decision of the Malian transitional authorities. The European Union calls on the Malian authorities to show restraint rather than repeat unacceptable behaviour towards its European partners, such as Denmark, whose contingent has just been the subject of a decision to return it on unfounded grounds.

The European Union also recalled its solidarity with the positions taken by the ECOWAS [Economic Community of West African States] and said that the adoption of restrictive measures against those who are obstructing the completion of the political transition in Mali is being finalised.

 

sources: commonspace.eu with DW News, Reuters, the press service of the European Council and other media outlets
photo: Soldiers from a German detachment of MINUSMA during a patrol on the road

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)