Elections in Kazakhstan: no surprises but still important

Kazakhstan's new ruling Adilet Party has taken a decisive lead in early exit polls, with more than 70% of the vote, in the country's early elections for its unicameral parliament, which could give it roughly 105 of the 145 seats in the new legislative chamber.

Five parties are projected to enter Kazakhstan’s new 145-member Kurultai, according to early exit polls. Parties needed at least 5% of the vote to win seats in the new legislature.

The election was Kazakhstan’s first parliamentary vote under the new Constitution, which replaced the bicameral Parliament with a single-chamber Kurultai.

The three exit polls put Adilet’s support between 70.7% and 72.3%, positioning the party for a commanding majority in the new 145-member unicameral Parliament, the Kurultai.

In other words, the poll projects around 109 seats for Adilet in Kurultai, giving the party a dominant majority.The Adilet Party merged with Amanat in 2022. Amanat, formerly Nur Otan, traces its roots to the 1999 campaign backing ex-President Nazarbayev. Copyright: Press service of the Adilet Party

The newly established Adilet Party, formed in April, absorbed Amanat, the country’s largest political party, ahead of the election.

Amanat has been the ruling party in Kazakhstan for almost 30 years. Formerly named Nur Otan, the party was created in 1999 from the electoral campaign headquarters,

The Adilet Party is now the country's most influential political force. It supports the new Constitution and nominated the largest number of candidates - 186.

The chair of the leading Adilet Party, Aibek Dadеbay, thanked voters after the first exit poll results were released.

"During the election campaign, we visited all regions and met with thousands of people across the country. At every meeting, we heard directly about the issues that matter to people, as well as their views and suggestions. Every opinion matters to us. All the proposals we received will be taken into account in our future work," he said.

Under the new electoral system, voters chose from seven political parties contesting the election. Unlike under the previous system, independent candidates could not run, with all Kurultai seats contested through party lists.

Who were the other parties competing in Kazakhstan’s first Kurultai election?

A total of seven political parties took part in the election, putting forward 545 candidates.

 

The first exit poll, conducted by the Kazakhstan Institute of Public Development, put Auyl at 6.2%, Respublica at 5.2%, Ak Zhol at 5.1% and the Nationwide Social Democratic Party at 5%. The People’s Party of Kazakhstan received 2.8%, while Baitaq got 0.9%.

The poll projects 12 seats for for Auyl, 9 for Respublica, 8 for the Nationwide Social Democratic Party and 7 for Ak Zhol. The People’s Party of Kazakhstan and Baitaq are not projected to win seats in the new Kurultai, exit polls show.

The Aq Zhol Democratic Party fielded 63 candidates. Founded in 2002, it advocates political and economic reforms, supports entrepreneurship and private business, and calls for strengthening the role of Parliament.

The Respublica Party, established in January 2023, nominated 75 candidates. The party focuses primarily on entrepreneurship, business and economic development.

The People’s Party of Kazakhstan fielded 72 candidates. Its platform centres on social policy, protection of workers and support for vulnerable groups.

The Auyl Party nominated 69 candidates. Founded in 2000, it has a clear political niche in the agricultural sector.

The Baitaq Green Party fielded 47 candidates. Founded in September 2022, it focuses on environmental protection and green development.

The Nationwide Social Democratic Party nominated 33 candidates. Founded in 2006, it entered Parliament for the first time in 2023.

Assessing the preliminary results, Indira Aubakirova, Head of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information, said Adilet had used all available platforms effectively, making its lead over the other parties very expected.

"The People’s Party of Kazakhstan, to my surprise, received around 3%. There could be several factors behind this. Firstly, the new generation is entering political life, and it no longer shares these views. At the same time, the natural decline of the older population is also having an impact, meaning that there are fewer," she said.

Among the main contenders were Aq Zhol and Respublica, two parties that have traditionally focused on the interests of entrepreneurs and the business community.

"It would seem that Aq Zhol has such a rich background. It has been on the political scene since 2002. But Respublica is a much younger party, launched in 2023, and it positioned itself very correctly and built its election campaign in a very competent way."

A new vice president

On election day, President Tokayev also made several important statements about the country’s political future, including the appointment of Kazakhstan’s first vice president.

The position of vice president, like the new Kurultai, was introduced under the new Constitution.

Asked by journalists at a polling station when the country would learn the name of the new vice president, Tokayev said he would officially announce the appointment within seven to ten days.

Tokayev also said he plans to launch the Qazaqstan Khalyq Kenesi Secretariat or Kazakhstan People’s Council. The new body is intended to strengthen and develop work previously carried out by the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan.

"I am confident that the work of the Kazakhstan People’s Council will be productive. The country should turn into a major construction site. Large construction projects will be implemented in every regional centre, district and city. Polyclinics, children’s rehabilitation centres and other social facilities will be built," said Tokayev.

The president’s comments came as Kazakhstan has already been accelerating construction and infrastructure projects across the country.

For example, just days before the election, several strategically important infrastructure projects were opened.

The Parliamentary elections come as Kazakhstan seeks to strengthen its role in Central Asia. For Kazakhstan, this is closely linked to its ambitions to expand trade, attract investment and develop transport routes between Asia and Europe, including the Middle Corridor and oil export routes.

Will Tokayev seek another presidential term?

One of the most closely watched questions on election day concerned Tokayev’s own political future.

Asked whether he would continue his presidential term and seek another election, Tokayev said he could give a more specific answer at a later stage.

"The Constitutional Court made such a decision. It is lawful, of course, and I have the legal right to be re-elected in accordance with the law," Tokayev said.

"But as for the upcoming election, whether I will run or not, and in which year, it is premature to speculate on that at this point."

The question is significant because the new Constitution changed the rules governing the presidency.

Tokayev’s current term remains the focus of political attention, while the constitutional changes have opened a new debate about the country’s political future.

A total of 777 international observers followed the voting process.

Source: commonspace.eu with EURONEWS

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council Presidential Statement on the Role of Diplomacy during Active Hostilities

UN Security Council Presidential Statement on the Role of Diplomacy during Active Hostilities

The United Nations Security Council is today expected to adopt a presidential statement on the role of diplomacy during active hostilities. The draft text, which was authored by Pakistan, underscores the importance of maintaining diplomatic engagement even after the outbreak of armed conflict, with a view to containing escalation, facilitating cessations of hostilities and ceasefires, and creating conditions conducive to peaceful political settlements. Resolution 2788 of 22 July 2025, which was initiated by Pakistan, reaffirmed the Council’s commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes under Chapter VI of the UN Charter. A year later, on 23 July, the Council convened an open debate to review the resolution’s implementation and examine ways of making more effective use of the peaceful dispute settlement tools available under Chapter VI.   The draft presidential statement builds on previous Council products, such as resolution 2788, but it is the first to focus specifically on the role of diplomacy in containing and de-escalating active hostilities. Since the open debate in July, Council members have continued to call for intensified efforts towards de-escalation and dialogue, although differences persist over how proactively the Council should promote mediation and other peaceful means of dispute settlement, particularly in situations where the consent of the parties is contested. In his statement opening the general debate of the 81st session of the General Assembly on 22 September, Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted the devastating consequences of ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, Sudan, and the Middle East, warning that these and other crises illustrate what happens when “force outpaces diplomacy” and stressing the urgency of sustained diplomatic engagement. The negotiations on the draft presidential statement do not appear to have been particularly contentious, although Council members expressed differing views on some elements of the text. Pakistan circulated the initial draft to Council members on 14 October. Following informal consultations with Council members to address comments on the initial draft, Pakistan circulated a first revised draft on 23 October, incorporating several proposed amendments. On 29 October, Pakistan circulated a second revised draft, which it placed under silence procedure until the following day (30 October). After the US broke silence, a third revised draft was circulated on 3 November and placed under silence procedure until this morning (4 November). The draft subsequently passed silence. The agreed presidential statement emphasises the importance of maintaining direct and indirect channels of communication between parties to armed conflict to reduce the risk of miscalculation and create opportunities for sustained political engagement. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)