Central Asia faces different environmental concerns

Asia is confronting a growing water crisis driven by climate change, overuse, and poor regional coordination. The Daily Sabah report released today (25 July) highlights heat‑accelerated glacier loss, shrinking rivers, and a collapse of Soviet-era water-sharing agreements—creating serious challenges for the five post-Soviet republics that rely heavily on the Syr Darya and Amu Darya basins.

Today, more than 82 million people in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan face water insecurity. Many villages lack regular access to safe drinking water, and internal migration is rising among populations impacted by climate stress and dwindling arable land. Some forecasts warn that over five million people could migrate due to environmental pressures by 2050.

Since the Soviet breakup, downstream countries like Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan have competed over water with upstream states, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, which control dam systems and seasonal water flows. Infrastructure projects such as Tajikistan’s Rogun Dam and Afghanistan’s Qosh Tepa Canal are raising anxiety over water access and internal upstream decision-making, especially as no binding regional water governance regime currently operates effectively.

While the region has engaged in dialogue with Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, even signing the "Declaration of Eternal Friendship (Hujand Declaration)" on 31 March 2025, a lack of alignment of national strategic priorities continues to pose challenges. To overcome this, experts argue for a holistic approach that integrates energy security with environmental and social concerns. Moreover, the Daily Sabath report argues that regional water management mandates need to be expanded and harmonised between the countries, with the possible help of the EU's Green Deal and Sustainable Water Investments strategy.

Source: commonspace.eu with Daily Sabah and other agencies.

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)