In Astana, Ministers brief foreign diplomats on measures in Tokayev's "State of the nation" speech

Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs held a briefing for approximately 100 representatives of foreign diplomatic missions and international organizations on the key provisions of President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s State-of-the-Nation Address. The briefing outlined the country’s strategic priorities in investment, industrial development, and transport infrastructure. Foreign Minister Mukhtar Tileuberdi highlighted opportunities for international cooperation, including plans to allocate approximately KZT 6.5 trillion from the National Fund for infrastructure modernization through 2029, strengthen investor protection mechanisms, and develop Kazakhstan’s role as a major Eurasian logistics hub.

Kazakhstan's Foreign Ministry held a briefing for heads of foreign diplomatic missions and international organizations on President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s State-of-the-Nation Address, titled “Kazakhstan’s Current Priorities in a New Historical Cycle,” Qazinform news agency reports.

Around 100 representatives of the diplomatic corps attended the event. The speakers included Foreign Minister Mukhtar Tileuberdi, Minister of Industry and Construction Yersaiyn Nagaspayev, and Vice Minister of Transport Damir Kozhakhmetov.

In his opening remarks, Tileuberdi noted that the President’s Address, delivered in the 35th year of Kazakhstan’s independence, summarizes the country’s achievements and outlines its long-term development strategy.

He stressed that amid global uncertainty, Kazakhstan’s foreign policy remains consistent and is based on constructive dialogue, respect for international commitments, and balanced pragmatism.

According to Tileuberdi, foreign direct investment inflows increased by 14.4% in 2025, reaching $20.5 billion.

“President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s large-scale reforms are our sincere and open invitation to your countries, business communities, and investors to engage in mutually beneficial cooperation,” he said.

Tileuberdi recalled that approximately 6.5 trillion tenge from the National Fund is expected to be allocated for infrastructure modernization through 2029. He also noted the proposal to declare 2027 the Year of Nationwide Large-Scale Construction.

According to the minister, Kazakhstan offers its foreign partners long-term planning opportunities, access to major investment projects and institutional guarantees for investment protection.

He identified energy, agro-industry, digitalization and artificial intelligence, as well as water management, as priority areas for cooperation.

Tileuberdi also outlined measures to strengthen legal guarantees for investors, including plans to establish an Investment Court based on English common law in Alatau City and adopt a new Civil Code by the end of 2027. He added that Kazakhstan’s diplomatic missions abroad had been instructed to provide individual support for major investment projects.

Minister of Industry and Construction Yersaiyn Nagaspayev said the Nationwide Large-Scale Construction program is designed to give fresh impetus to domestic industry and attract additional investment.

He noted that, under the development strategy outlined by President Tokayev, manufacturing accounts for 13% of GDP, surpassing the mining sector. Since 2023, a total of 647 industrial projects have been implemented across the country.

Nagaspayev said mechanical engineering, metallurgy, the chemical industry, and electrical engineering are the most promising areas for investment.

He said investors are offered tax and customs incentives, land plots equipped with infrastructure, and support through a one-stop-shop mechanism.

“Our goal is not simply to attract investment, but to build long-term industrial partnerships based on technology transfer, localization of production, deep processing of raw materials, workforce training, and the output of competitive products,” he said.

Vice Minister of Transport Damir Kozhakhmetov outlined the objectives set for the transport sector in the President’s Address, emphasizing Kazakhstan’s ambition to become a leading logistics hub in Eurasia.

He said the country aims to move beyond its role as a transit territory and become an organizer of international cargo flows.

According to Kozhakhmetov, approximately 85% of overland freight traffic between China and Europe passes through Kazakhstan. Transit cargo volumes increased by 18% last year, reaching 39.1 million tons.

Among the key infrastructure projects, he cited the Bakhty-Ayagoz railway line, the Aral-Caspian transport corridor, the modernization of all 37 road border crossing points on the borders with Russia and Kyrgyzstan, and the construction of a new airport in Astana.

He also highlighted the importance of the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route and invited foreign partners to invest in ports, airports and logistics centers.

“Kazakhstan is moving from the status of a landlocked country to that of a country that connects continents,” he said.

During the question-and-answer session, diplomats expressed particular interest in Kazakhstan’s investment climate, guarantees for investor protection, participation in investment projects, transport corridor development and cooperation in critical minerals.

The speakers provided detailed responses and reaffirmed their readiness to continue dialogue with international partners.

Concluding the briefing, the participants emphasized that Kazakhstan’s diplomatic missions abroad would provide comprehensive support to foreign companies interested in establishing modern production facilities and introducing new technologies. The country remains open to long-term investment partnerships, the ministry noted.

source: commonspace.eu with Kazinform (Astana)

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)