Apathy the biggest obstacle to 26 September referendum in Azerbaijan

Apathy is proving to be the biggest obstacle in the forthcoming Constitutional referendum that will be held in Azerbaijan on 26 September. With two weeks to go before the people of Azerbaijan go to the polls to vote in the referendum, it seems many are likely not to go at all.

The referendum was called when in a surprise move during the summer, president Ilham Aliev sent a package of constitutional amendments for the consideration of the constitutional court in order that they may be submitted for popular approval. The Court endorsed the proposals and the process for holding the referendum started. There has been speculation as to why the President initiated the constitutional changes in the first place. The government holds a tight grip on the country's leverages of power anyway, regardless of the constitutional niceties. Some argued that the proposals were part of the government's efforts to consolidate control, others see them as heralding possible political opening.

The government of Azerbaijan refused to refer the constitutional amendments to the Venice Commission for an opinion. The Commission is a mechanism of the Council of Europe that assists member states to review important laws and constitutional changes in order to ensure that they abide by the Council of Europe's principles and agreements. However, last week the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe took the initiative of referring the constitutional changes to the Venice Commission itself. A preliminary opinion is now expected next week, although the final position of the commission will only be confirmed in October.

In the meantime, in another surprise move, the leader of one of the opposition forces, the Executive Secretary of REAL Movement Natig Jafarli, was released from detention. He was arrested on 12 August and put under administrative detention on charges of tax evasion. Despite his release the case against him continues. Jafarli's arrest in August caused an outcry in the international community. His release yesterday was on the other hand welcomed by the US State department and other western governments. The REAL movement was expecting to campaign actively in the referendum campaign but the arrest of another one of its leaders seriously hampered its efforts.

Many Azerbaijanis remain aloof from politics, and have little interest in the constitutional referendum, and little trust in the electoral process. Apathy may therefore be the biggest factor in the referendum in two weeks' time.

The ruling party of President Aliev, New Azerbaijan Party (YAP) has in response initiated a campaign in the country's regions in an effort to mobilise public support. Political observers watching the process see the campaign as artificial. Participants in the meetings are mainly teachers and civil servants "specially invited" for the meetings. But on the other hand there is little sign that the opposition is doing any better in mobilising support for its position. Things may pick up later this week, once the bayram holidays of Aid el Audha are out of the way. But it is unlikely that they will be enough to instil public enthusiasm in the process. Azerbaijan has a very bad record of electoral malpractises, and trust in the process inside and outside Azerbaijan is very low. In the last parliamentary elections the leading international election observation organisation, ODIHR, refused to monitor the election when it was not allowed to deploy enough monitors to oversee the process properly. This time round they have not been invited.

The referendum is therefore likely to be another disappointment for those wanting to see serious political reforms in Azerbaijan, and who have been waiting patiently for many years to see a signal that the process has started.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Members of the New Azerbaijan Party in Siyazan region prepare for the Constitutional referendum scheduled for 26 September (picture courtesy of www.yap.az)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)