Alcohol in the age of corona

For various reasons, alcohol has been in the press over the last few weeks in relation to the coronavirus crisis. In this short article for commonspace.eu, William Murray looks into why, advising us to keep our heads. 

'Champagne - In victory you deserve it; in defeat, you need it'. This quote, often misattributed to Napoleon Bonaparte, appears to be the approach of some in combatting the current pandemic. Alcohol has featured in the global news cycle for a number of reasons over the course of the crisis - some more predictable than others.

Certain countries, including South Africa and Greenland, and (for a brief period) parts of the north of France, have entirely banned the sale of alcohol during the crisis, citing concerns that it lowers awareness of the dangers of the virus and the strength of people's immune systems [1]. In recent days, a letter was circulated, purporting to be by the NHS, stating that similar precautions would be taken in the UK. Whilst met with unsurprising backlash, this has now been shown to be fake news [2].

During times of hardship, alcohol has proven to be a common crutch for people, especially in times of economic stress, anxiety [3], and in combatting issues of self-esteem and family conflict [4]. The relationship between boredom and alcohol use is also well studied [5]. Consequentially, it is hardly surprising that people would be more likely to turn to alcohol during the current period of uncertainty and isolation. In the US, we are seeing this playing out with experts warning of an increase in the number of drug users and alcoholics relapsing due to pressures brought by the crisis [6].

Whilst prohibition seems to be rather over the top, there are certainly concerns related to excessive alcohol consumption whilst in isolation that we should be aware of. Contrary to fake news circulating about alcohol's ability to prevent COVID-19, it is common knowledge that alcohol lowers the body's immune system and, thus, its ability to defend against the virus [7]. Additionally, alcohol is a depressant, increasing people's propensity to become anxious and depressed, which does not help in already stressful and secluded times [8].

All this considered, whilst a drink here and there can help us to keep a sense of normality, we need to be careful. We are just at the beginning of what is likely to be many months of disruption, isolation and change.

References:

[1] The Drinks Business - 'The Countries that have Banned Alcohol Sales due to the Coronavirus': https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2020/03/the-countries-that-have-banned-alcohol-sales-due-to-the-coronavirus/

[2] Evening Standard - 'Coronavirus alcohol ban: Scam letter claiming to be from NHS explained': https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/scam-nhs-letter-alcohol-ban-coronavirus-a4401951.html

[3] L.I. Pearlin, C.W. Radabaugh - 'Economic Strains and the Coping Function of Alcohol': https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/226357

[4] J. Lee, R. Lee - 'Material Hardship and Alcohol Use among Low-income Households in South Korea': http://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201624557928806.page 

[5] J.D. Orcutt - 'Contrasting Effects of Two Kinds of Boredom on Alcohol Use': https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002204268401400112

[6] New York Post ­- 'Coronavirus is causing a rise in drug and alcohol relapses': https://nypost.com/2020/03/30/coronavirus-is-causing-a-rise-in-drug-and-alcohol-relapses/ 

[7] Rappler - 'FALSE: Alcoholic drinks 'reduce coronavirus risk'': https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/fact-check/254434-alcoholic-drinks-reduce-coronavirus-risk

[8] Drinkaware - 'Alcohol and mental health': https://www.drinkaware.co.uk/alcohol-facts/health-effects-of-alcohol/mental-health/alcohol-and-mental-health/

source: This short article was prepared by William Murray for commonspace.eu It is part of our series of public service announcements aimed at helping our readers deal with issues related to the coronavirus pandemic and its effects

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)