Medvedev says CIS "is an important stability factor in the post-Soviet space"

Leaders of eleven CIS countries gathered in Moscow this week to mark the 20th anniversary of the establishement of the Commonwealth of Independent States which replaced the USSR in December 1991. It was an ocassion for reflection and also a bit of nostalgia. The Russian President Dimitri Medvedev recalled his own recollections of the day. "What happened is that I left one nation, which was called the USSR, and flew to Germany. And when I came back, I returned to a fundamentally different situation, one in which our common state was no longer."

The Russian leader added "I won’t deny that I, too, felt very strong emotions. But what’s most important is that today, we are sitting at this table, that we are friends, and that we are ready to develop our kind-hearted relations.

We say many things about the CIS. Clearly, over the course of the last 20 years, the Commonwealth has had a very difficult path of development. We are different nations with varying economic conditions, and our cultures are both close and, at the same time, distinct. But these cultures have not only shown the ability to understand each other very well, but also to cooperate efficiently on a voluntary, equitable and mutually beneficial basis.

The CIS has become an important stability factor in the post-Soviet space, and has truly become an influential regional alliance, even despite the costs that I suppose have always been there and which remain today. Together, we managed to do a great deal."

Medvedev added that the CIS will help for many years to come in resolving a wide variety of challenges.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that the CIS has little to show for its twenty years of existance, and has often been criticised as an organisation that produces volumes of agreements, few of which ever get implemented. Perhaps its biggest failure was its inability to prevent the Georgia-Russia war of August 2008. Russia's recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia afterwards was negtaively assessed by other CIS countries, and Georgia left the organisation soon afterwards. The CIS however continues to provide a forum for most of the former soviet republics to meet and exchange views, and its role is slowly being taken over by other organisations such as the CSTO and EurAsEc, although some CIS members have made it clear they do not want to participate in the these organisations

source: commonspace.eu with information from kremlin.ru

photo: Leaders of the 11 CIS countries meeting in Moscow on 20 December 2011 (picture courtesy of the Press Service of the President of Russia)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia puts pressure on Armenia ahead of Putin-Pashinyan meeting in Bishkek next week

Russia puts pressure on Armenia ahead of Putin-Pashinyan meeting in Bishkek next week

Russian president, Vladimir Putin, and Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan are expected to meet in Bishkek next week on the margins of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. Russian presidential aide Yury Ushakov confirmed this according to the Russian agency, TASS. “We will have a conversation with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. Our leaders have already spoken following the elections held in Armenia, so it is fairly clear what the conversation will be about,” Ushakov said. He added that, among other issues, the leaders will discuss Yerevan’s aspiration to join the EU and its cooperation with the Eurasian Economic Union. “We continue to insist that Armenia cannot aspire to EU membership while at the same time receiving enormous benefits from its cooperation within the Eurasian Economic Union. This issue must somehow be resolved. And the President and the Prime Minister will undoubtedly discuss it,” Ushakov said. The meeting comes as Russia continues to put unprecedented pressure on Armenia. Using very undiplomatic language, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, on Friday (28 August), called on Pashinyan to stop shifting responsibility for Armenia's problems onto Russia and the CSTO. In 2022, the Armenian Prime Minister personally refused the deployment of the organization's mission, opting instead for Western mediation in Prague, where he officially recognized Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, recalled the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Yerevan's attempts to blame Moscow, the church, or its own citizens for the consequences of its own decisions are shameless and contradict historical facts, Zakharova emphasized. "Everyone is to blame in your view. Only you are not to blame." "Nikol Vovayevich, elections in your country have ended. You can stop hanging noodles on the ears of your people. Gather your courage and tell the truth at least once, as it actually happened," wrote Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova, addressing Nikol Pashinyan’s statements yesterday. The five-year program of the Armenian government released this week, only speaks of releations with Russia as a "partnership" and omits the previously used term "strategic alliance". Pashinyan told the Armenian parliament this week, "The events of September 2022 took place right before your eyes. A strategic partnership should mean a strategic partnership. If we write 'strategic partnership' in the document now, you will ask why Russia and the CSTO did not fulfill their security obligations in September 2022. What else do I need to tell you?"

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)