Thursday Interview: Fidan Namazova

Ahead of International Women’s Day on 8 March, commonspace.eu spoke with Fidan Namazova, an Azerbaijani peace-building practitioner and researcher, about women’s inclusion in regional dialogue, environmental cooperation as a pathway to confidence-building, and her work on gender-sensitive urban development in the South Caucasus. She was joined in conversation by Alexandra Dumitrescu, Program Manager and International Coordinator at LINKS Europe.

Ms. Namazova has been closely involved in LINKS Europe’s Thematic Groups for a New Armenian–Azerbaijani Dialogue, serving as Chair of the Thematic Group on Environment. In this capacity, she contributed to shaping the Report of the Thematic Group on Environment, advancing the idea that environmental cooperation can provide practical entry points for rebuilding trust and fostering sustainable peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan. 

"My message to young women starting their careers is simple: no one can stop you. Keep learning, keep working on yourself, believe in your abilities, and aim to make the world a better place for yourself and for future generations.”

Read our full conversation with Ms. Namazova below:

Thank you for joining us, Ms. Namazova. To begin, what motivated you personally to engage in peace-building and regional dialogue efforts with LINKS Europe and beyond? And based on your experience, how inclusive do you find these processes for women? Do regional dialogue platforms in the South Caucasus truly make space for women’s voices and leadership, or is there still a structural gap in your opinion?

Thank you for the invitation. I am Fidan Namazova, from Azerbaijan. I grew up in a conflict-affected country, and that is the very first reason I became interested in peace-building.

There is also a personal story behind this. My father’s side of the family is originally from the Karabakh region. I grew up surrounded by relatives who were internally displaced persons (IDPs), so from an early age I was closely aware of the problems and needs of people in the region, especially within displaced communities. That left a deep imprint on my worldview and future approach.

Later, my academic background supported these interests, and I began working directly with IDP women’s communities. In that sense, my career path was built from a personal story that gradually developed into professional engagement. Until today, I remain committed to ensuring that women’s needs, especially those of vulnerable women, are voiced and taken into consideration, both within the community and more broadly.

Regarding inclusivity, I would say that current processes are relatively inclusive for women. We now see many female peace-builders from both sides nowadays. However, it would be important to ensure broader representation, women from different backgrounds, with diverse experiences, and from different strata of the population. At present, representation is still more urban. It would be valuable to include more women from rural areas and vulnerable groups, particularly IDP communities and women with disabilities. Inclusivity should be understood in a broader sense.

As for structural gaps, they exist everywhere. But I would certainly prefer to see women’s voices more strongly represented. Today, many discussions focus on security, transportation, and regional connectivity. We still lack sufficient attention to human security issues such as poverty and food shortages. Bringing these issues more prominently onto the agenda would significantly enrich the peace process.

Let’s turn to your work with LINKS Europe’s Thematic Groups for a New Armenian–Azerbaijani Dialogue. Environmental policy is not traditionally the first area associated with post-conflict reconciliation. Why do you believe that topics such as ecology, climate change, shared water systems, and environmental education might succeed in bringing people to the table when purely political dialogues often struggle?

Security and military issues are still prevalent today, but over time their urgency may diminish. Climate change and regional environmental challenges, however, will remain pressing concerns. These are joint problems affecting the entire region and both countries (Azerbaijan and Armenia) directly.

Environmental issues have a direct impact on people’s daily lives. For example, energy security is becoming a major concern for both countries. Azerbaijan is currently facing serious water scarcity that has reached critical levels. Armenia faces deforestation and desertification, which are also linked to climate change. Over recent decades, both countries have experienced record increases in average temperatures.

These shared environmental vulnerabilities can become a basis for cooperation. Through joint dialogues, projects and common initiatives, countries can transform environmental challenges into opportunities for sustainable peace-building.

For example, Armenia could support Azerbaijan in areas related to water security, while Azerbaijan could assist Armenia in energy security. Such cooperation could open dialogue from a different perspective, one focused on solving common, practical problems and building solutions together. This, in itself, can become an integral part of the peace process.

Returning to women’s representation more broadly: given your research interests in women’s empowerment, how do you assess progress in representation within public administration and academic leadership in Azerbaijan and the wider South Caucasus?

Over the past decades, we have seen more women represented in public administration and academic leadership in Azerbaijan. Many women obtain PhD degrees abroad and return to work in the country, which is encouraging.

In addition, it is nice to see that now students of mine come and ask me about the peace initiatives taking place and how they can participate. This is relatively new, but it has been happening more and more. I think it is very important to have the youth engaged in these processes, especially as they themselves are encouraged to actively participate. 

However, the challenge lies in the areas of representation. Women remain underrepresented in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields and in security-related institutions. Traditionally male-dominated sectors are still largely controlled by men, while women are more present in so-called “female-accepted” professions. The government tries to incentivise women to study these subjects, but still, there is a gap which should be worked on. More or less, it is still the case in the entire region that women turn to these more “female-accepted” professions. Based on my observations, this pattern is similar across other countries in the region as well.

When we last spoke, you mentioned that you were considering pursuing a PhD focusing on women and urban spaces. Could you tell us more about this research idea?

Yes, thank you. Like much of my work, this research is also inspired by personal experience. As a woman living in a city, you encounter everyday challenges. Over time, you begin to analyse these experiences, and that is how my research interest developed.

I will be presenting this research at the World Urban Forum in Azerbaijan in May. My work focuses on how to design cities that are more inclusive for women, particularly in terms of urban planning, safety, and accessibility. In terms of the design, in terms of urban opportunity and security to ensure that the cities are comfortable, accessible and safe for women, and so that they do not create additional problems in women’s daily lives.

In many post-Soviet cities, including Baku, urban development has historically been shaped primarily by male perspectives, without sufficient analysis of women’s needs and concerns. The lack of a gender-sensitive approach has made cities less convenient and, in some cases, less safe for women.

My research explores possible solutions, the resources required for proper implementation, and ways to ensure that urban planning becomes safer and more comfortable for residents, especially for women.

I am starting with Baku. Even though Baku is the most developed city in Azerbaijan, women still face significant urban challenges. The recommendations developed there could later be adapted and implemented in other cities as well. 

Finally, ahead of International Women’s Day, what advice would you give to young women interested in pursuing careers in international affairs, academia, or STEM fields as you said?

One of my favourite quotes is from Ayn Rand: “The question is not who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.”

I think this captures one of the biggest challenges women face. My message to young women starting their careers is simple: no one can stop you. Keep learning, keep working on yourself, believe in your abilities, and aim to make the world a better place for us and for future generations.

Believe in yourself and keep going.

Follow Ms. Namazova on LinkedIn

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)