Editorial: War is never a solution!

This is an editorial, prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

The Caucasus region has been plunged back into war. From yesterday morning fighting has been taking place between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces across the line of contact in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

The last twenty four hours have shown us already that this is not some localised skirmish but has all the hallmarks of war. The number of casualties, both civilian and military, is likely to already be in triple figures, and will inevitably increase. All sorts of weaponry has already been used. And the rhetoric from both sides is highly belligerent.

related content: Heavy fighting erupts in Karabakh

This outbreak of violence in the long running dispute between Armenians and Azerbaijanis on Nagorno-Karabakh does not come as a surprise. Only the blind would not have seen it coming. The summer has been tense, more so since the 12 July escalations. There were daily breeches of the cease fire, and the propaganda war had reached new heights. With the peace process stalled, the region flooded with modern lethal weaponary, there appeared only one direction to go.

There is now an urgent need to stop all hostilities and return to the negotiating table for comprehensive and meaningful negotiations conducted with a sense of urgency. Both sides, for different reasons, may still think that fighting this out is the right thing to do. They are wrong. War is never the solution. It brings death and destruction, and often sows the seeds for the next conflict. However as long as there is no solution to the Karabakh conflict war will always be a tempting alternative.

The Karabakh conflict is causing great harm to the entire Caucasus region, obstructing its development. The region has had more than its share of conflict in the last three decades: the secessionist wars in Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh in the 1990s, the Chechen Wars in the North Caucasus, the Georgia-Russia War in 2008 - and this not to mention many incidents and escalations as unresolved disputes fester and develop their own dynamic. Conflicts such as this one between Armenians and Azerbaijanis are draining energy, resources and potential from the region. Despite being rich in agriculture and natural resources, strategically placed to provide connectivity between continents, endowed with beauty to match any tourist spot, and teeming with young, talented and creative people, the Caucasus region lags behind and seems unable to take off. The fighting in Karabakh will once more set the region back, with impact beyond the current warzone to the rest of Armenia and Azerbaijan, and also to Georgia and beyond.

For ten years, commonspace.eu has been calling for an alternative to war in Nagorno-Karabakh and the entire region, and we have urged leaders and citizens alike to commit genuinely and comprehensively to peaceful solution of disputes. We do so again today.

The international community has a role to play, but must first get its act together. Regardless of the mantra of support for the OSCE Minsk Process, repeated ad nauseam by statements from the Chancelleries of the world in the last twenty four hours, it should now be obvious to all that something else is required - both to end the current crisis and to avoid a repetition in a few months time. Despite the fact that the global and European security systems are hardly functioning as they should at the moment, the diplomatic capacity to engage meaningfully to resolving this conflict exists. It is now time to be creative and resolute. Otherwise this war, may drag on for a while, and may drag in outside elements that will make this conflict even more difficult to untangle.

source: This is an editorial prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

photo: Civilian houses destroyed during fighting in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone on Sunday 27 September 2020 (screen grab from footage on Maestro TV, Tbilisi)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.