Trans-Anatolian Pipeline on the way to becoming a reality. The construction of this major infrastructure project has huge geo strategic importance and impacts the region's future dynamic.

 

Plans to construct the Trans-Anatolian Pipeline (TANAP) to move gas produced by Azerbaijan through Georgia and Turkey to the markets of Europe have now firmed up and the project is soon expected to be up and running.

TANAP will help satisfy demands for gas in both Turkey itself, as well as Europe. Initially it will supply 6bn cu m/yr of gas from Azerbaijan's Shah Deniz field to Turkey, with a further 10bn cu m/yr crossing Turkey on its way to Europe.

According to London's Financial Times newspaper this is "good news for Turkey, where demand is expected to exceed its existing import portfolio within two to three years, but even better news for the EU which has long been looking to secure access to new supplies to reduce reliance on existing sources. Chief among those is Russia's Gazprom, which meets about 25 per cent of EU gas demand, and in September became the subject of an anti-trust case by the EU."

Discussions on building a gas pipeline from the Caspian Sea to the European markets have been going on for a nuumber of years, with a number of projects being considered. However last year Turkey and Azerbaijan stepped in to propose TANAP. In December last year, the two countries signed a memorandum of understanding to establish a consortium that will build the gas pipeline. On June, 26 Azerbaijan and Turkey signed an intergovernmental agreement on TANAP implementation. TANAP is owned by Azerbaijan's state oil company, SOCAR, which has 80% share in it and the Turkish State Oil Company (BOTAS)which owns the rest of the shares.

BP's Deputy Director for Turkey, Hakan Turker,  was quoted as saying that  US$ 10 billion will be invested in Turkey within the framework of the project and US$ 2 billion  in Georgia. Turker was quoted as saying that the Shafaq-Asiman block that BP is prospecting in partnership with SOCAR, could alone hold as much as 1tn cu m of gas.

Earlier this week the Azerbaijani Parliament ratified the agreement for the establishment of TANAP, a move welcomed by EU Energy Commissioner Guenther Oettinger .  A statement released by the EU says: 

"This Decision to ratify the TANAP agreement shows the concrete determination of Azerbaijan to bring its gas to Europe. This pipeline will mean that gas is brought to Europe's border, to then freely circulate within the European Union. It is a pleasure to welcome Azerbaijan, and more especially SOCAR, to the European Union's energy market."

The pipeline is expected to be finished in 2018.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "the construction of the gas pipeline is of tremendous geo strategic importance and will help change the dynamic in the region beyond energy.

The pipeline will provide the basis for linking the European markets with energy suppliers further afield, particularly Turkmenistan. It will reduce the dependence of the European Union on Russian gas supplies. It consolidates the strategic relationship between Azerbaijan and Turkey that is already developed in many fields. It also makes Georgia increasingly important as a connector between Azerbaijan and Turkey for energy transit and transportation in general. Georgia's new Prime Minister Bidhzina Ivanishvili announced this week he will shortly visit Baku and praised Georgian-Azerbaijani relations.

Following on from the success of the Baku-Tbilisi Ceyhan Pipeline and other smaller projects TANAP will contribute substantially in consolidating co-operation and interdependence between Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey and this will have lasting impact on the region."

source: commonspace.eu with Trend, News.Az and the Financial Times

photo: A gas pipeline in Turkey (archive picture).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)