Mine action as a confidence-building mechanism in the South Caucasus

Landmine contamination in the South Caucasus remains one of the biggest humanitarian challenges in the region. Since the 1990s, mines have taken the lives of thousands of civilians, and they have left a mark on the natural environment. In addition, development and infrastructure remain limited in contaminated areas, impeding economic recovery and the return of displaced people. While demining in the region has not previously been a priority due to the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the meeting at the White House in August 2025, where the two countries initialed a draft peace agreement, offers new opportunities for advancing demining efforts.

While the peace agreement is not yet signed, mine clearance could and should function as a confidence-building measure between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. This is not something new; in 2004-2005, the US Department of State implemented the “Beecroft Initiative” involving the three countries, and it conducted joint humanitarian demining training. In 2005, the OSCE held another workshop in Tbilisi entitled “Confidence-building and Regional Cooperation through Mine Action”. The meeting advocated for the creation of a system of open information exchange and establishing regional cooperation. Moreover, LINKS Europe Foundation has, since 2018, been promoting a holistic region-wide approach to clear the South Caucasus of landmines. The campaign Landmine Free South Caucasus 2025/2026, initiated by LINKS Europe, is continuing these efforts.

While advocating for mine-action as a confidence-building mechanism may not be new, its coordinated regional implementation could yield substantial positive outcomes for the countries in the South Caucasus.

Take, for example, the regional approach to Mine Action in southeastern Europe. In November 2000, three national mine-action centres (Albania, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina) and the ITF established the South-Eastern Europe Mine Action Coordination Council (SEEMACC), a technical regional body whose goal is to make southeastern Europe free of mines. SEEMACC managed to depoliticise mine action in a region that has seen bitter conflicts and divisions. SEEMACC has become essential in helping those countries clear mines efficiently while also contributing to confidence-building among the participating states. While there are many differences between southeastern Europe and the South Caucasus, lessons can be learnt. Cooperation on mine action among countries can serve as an important first step toward building confidence, as demonstrated by experiences in Southeastern Europe.

The regional coordination of mine action in the South Caucasus cannot wait. The humanitarian, environmental, and economic risks are too big. The campaign Landmine Free South Caucasus 2025/2026 proposes recognising landmine contamination as a regional challenge and establishing a working group appointed by the governments of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia to develop a coordinated regional response. Secondly, the three governments need to establish mutually agreed landmine- and UXO-free zones in border areas, with all parties committing to their clearance and long-term maintenance. Thirdly, the governments have a responsibility to help and protect communities living near contaminated areas. 

Source: This briefing was first published in the South Caucasus Landmine Observer on 26 March 2026. It was prepared by Alexandra Dumitrescu, editor of South Caucasus Landmine Observer and International Coordinator at LINKS Europe.   

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)