Mine action as a confidence-building mechanism in the South Caucasus

Landmine contamination in the South Caucasus remains one of the biggest humanitarian challenges in the region. Since the 1990s, mines have taken the lives of thousands of civilians, and they have left a mark on the natural environment. In addition, development and infrastructure remain limited in contaminated areas, impeding economic recovery and the return of displaced people. While demining in the region has not previously been a priority due to the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the meeting at the White House in August 2025, where the two countries initialed a draft peace agreement, offers new opportunities for advancing demining efforts.

While the peace agreement is not yet signed, mine clearance could and should function as a confidence-building measure between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. This is not something new; in 2004-2005, the US Department of State implemented the “Beecroft Initiative” involving the three countries, and it conducted joint humanitarian demining training. In 2005, the OSCE held another workshop in Tbilisi entitled “Confidence-building and Regional Cooperation through Mine Action”. The meeting advocated for the creation of a system of open information exchange and establishing regional cooperation. Moreover, LINKS Europe Foundation has, since 2018, been promoting a holistic region-wide approach to clear the South Caucasus of landmines. The campaign Landmine Free South Caucasus 2025/2026, initiated by LINKS Europe, is continuing these efforts.

While advocating for mine-action as a confidence-building mechanism may not be new, its coordinated regional implementation could yield substantial positive outcomes for the countries in the South Caucasus.

Take, for example, the regional approach to Mine Action in southeastern Europe. In November 2000, three national mine-action centres (Albania, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina) and the ITF established the South-Eastern Europe Mine Action Coordination Council (SEEMACC), a technical regional body whose goal is to make southeastern Europe free of mines. SEEMACC managed to depoliticise mine action in a region that has seen bitter conflicts and divisions. SEEMACC has become essential in helping those countries clear mines efficiently while also contributing to confidence-building among the participating states. While there are many differences between southeastern Europe and the South Caucasus, lessons can be learnt. Cooperation on mine action among countries can serve as an important first step toward building confidence, as demonstrated by experiences in Southeastern Europe.

The regional coordination of mine action in the South Caucasus cannot wait. The humanitarian, environmental, and economic risks are too big. The campaign Landmine Free South Caucasus 2025/2026 proposes recognising landmine contamination as a regional challenge and establishing a working group appointed by the governments of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia to develop a coordinated regional response. Secondly, the three governments need to establish mutually agreed landmine- and UXO-free zones in border areas, with all parties committing to their clearance and long-term maintenance. Thirdly, the governments have a responsibility to help and protect communities living near contaminated areas. 

Source: This briefing was first published in the South Caucasus Landmine Observer on 26 March 2026. It was prepared by Alexandra Dumitrescu, editor of South Caucasus Landmine Observer and International Coordinator at LINKS Europe.   

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)