Commentary: Dacic's meeting with Karabakh separatists - an awkward moment.

Commentary by the political editor of commonspace.eu

The Chairman-in-Office of the OSCE, the Foreign Minister of Serbia, Ivica Dacic, has just concluded a three day visit to the South Caucasus. In Baku, Tbilisi and Yerevan the head of the OSCE met with the Presidents of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia and other officials and held a range of other meetings.

An early summer visit by whoever is holding the annual chairmanship of the OSCE to the South Caucasus has now become a ritual. It is an opportunity for the Chairmanship to show its committment to the work of the OSCE in the region and push forward the OSCE agenda. If we are to believe the official statements and what was said in the press conferences during this visit most of the talk was about bilateral relations between Serbia and the three respective countries. This ofcourse would not have been the case in reality. There are many outstanding issues in the region with which the OSCE is engaged, and Dacic's visit helped to put some of them in context.

There was however one meeting during the visit  which must have been particularly awkward for the Serbian Minister. This was the meeting with the President of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Bako Sahakyan. We can safely say that that meeting was most definetely not about bilateral relations. Serbia does not recognise separatists entitites. Its own experience of Kosovo remains a sore point, despite the fact that it has been putting a brave face on it in its efforts to move forward.

Very little has been said about the meeting between Dacic and the Karabakh separatists. According to the Foreign Minister of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Karen Mirzoyan, the meeting "was held in a warm and constructive atmosphere".  Mirzoyan told reporters that views were exchanged on the Nagorno-Karabakh negotiations. The meeting agenda also included the situation at the Karabakh-Azerbaijan Line of Contact, and the avenues for reducing tension. Armenian media also quoted Mirzoyan as saying that "the Karabakh party underscored the OSCE activities, which are aimed at the creation of a necessary climate for a progress in the negotiations".

There was however no reference to the meeting with the Karabakh separatists on the website of the Serbian OSCE Chairmanship.

Serbian diplomacy has inherited the mantel of the diplomacy of the Former Yugoslavia, which was considered efficient, eclectic and extremely well networked. The new Serbia is smaller in size, and in many extents in its vision. It does not have grandiose world visions, as Yugoslavia had with the non-aligned movement. Yet it has an important role to play in the area of European security where it is emerging as a country that can communicate well across the many divides that have recently emerged on the continent. It seems that this was the spirit with which Daciic approached his visit to the South Caucasus, and his words were listened to with respect by his interlocateurs.

Serbia's engagement with the problems of the South Caucasus in the first five months of its chairmanship has been cautious - one can say even lethargic. One hopes that Dacic has now returned to Belgrade energised, and that Serbia will use the remaining months of its presidency to push through movement on issues such as the Karabakh conflict and the conflicts in Georgia. There are already increasing expectations of what can be achieved in the Belgrade meeting of OSCE Foreign Ministers next December. The OSCE's existential crisis is not yet over, and events on the ground in Ukraine may still determine the health of the institution in Vienna. But over the last days Dacic would have seen with his own eyes the complexity of the Caucasus region, and would have appreciated better the importance of engaging with this region more intensively in order to resolve some of the difficult challenges that it faces. Dacic, and Serbian diplomacy has seven months to do that. At the end of December, Germany takes over the Chairmanship of the OSCE. At that point we can expect something different in both style and substance, although quite what is as yet not clear.

source: This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

photo: Serbian Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic, who is currently the Chairman in Office of the OSCE, met in Yerevan on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 with the President of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Bakop Sahakyan. (picture courtesy of the press office of the NKR President)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)