The best and the worst. Freedom House paints bleak picture of media in South Caucasus

The stark difference in the performance of countries in Eastern and Central Europe and Eurasia in the field of human rights and freedom of expression was highlighted in a report by the respected American organisatkion Freedom House just released. Of the 33 countries and territories in the region that the report looks at it characterises only 28% as free. This figure is lower than the world average. 

Of the 197 countries and territories assessed during 2011, a total of 66 (33.5 percent) were rated Free, 72 (36.5 percent) were rated Partly Free, and 59 (30 percent) were rated Not Free. This balance marks a shift toward the Partly Free category compared with the edition covering 2010, which featured 68 Free, 65 Partly Free, and 63 Not Free countries and territories.

In its 2012 report Freedom House states:

"Countries in this region range from among the best to among the worst in the world with regard to respect for human rights. Most states in the non-Baltic former Soviet Union rank at or near the bottom of Freedom House’s ratings for political rights and civil liberties, while the democracies of Central Europe have established institutions that generally protect most fundamental rights, despite some recent backsliding."

In the report's Global Freedom Rankings for Media Freedom the three South Caucasus countries are placed way down in the second half of the table. Georgia is ranked in 110 place as partly free together with Bangladesh and Mauritania, Azerbaijan in 172 as not free together with Russia and Zimbabwe.

Armenia is placed in 149 place as not free.

Commenting on the report, Armenian former foreign minister and candidate in next Sunday's Parliamentary elections Vardan Oskanian said:

"It is sad that Armenian media are rated as ‘Not Free’ and rank 149th in a list of 197 countries – between Angola and Pakistan. If Armenia’s media are not even rated as “partly free,” any democracy is out of the question."

According to Tert.am Oscanian said that "The sooner Armenia’s TV channels enjoy as much freedom as news websites the sooner Armenia will become a normal state."

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "Whilst the Freedom House report is not a perfect exercise in gauging press freedom around the world it does capture the essence of the situation and broadly reflects the reality on the ground. Media performance in the post Soviet countries are now meticulously recorded by a range of local and international sources, and all agree that there are serious problems that both impact and reflect the political processes in these countries.

In the South Caucasus the Freedom House report reflects the problems that have been highlighted in many previous reports on the same subject. For Armenia and Georgia the ability of the media to operate freely during the election campaigns scheduled for this year and next year will determine their future rankings not only in the Freedom House reports but also in the wider global opinion. Azerbaijan which is ranked the lowest of the three in the Freedom House report has no elections this year. Its treatment of journalists is however coming under increasing criticism, and this is likely to increase.

However if any one of the three countries is able to make a breakthrough and have real media freedom, the position of the two others will be unsustainable. This is what to watch out for in the future."

source: commonspace.eu with Freedom House

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)