Azerbaijani expert:

The compromise may be only bilateral, and in this context the main mistake of Azerbaijan is that it does not want to go to contacts, talks and take Karabakh as a party to the conflict, the known Azerbaijani political expert, Arif Yunusof, told Arminfo correspondent.

"We have to reckon with Karabakhis, talk to them and discuss their problems. If Ilham Aliyev says about wide autonomy, let him specify what he means. I understand very well that any document about the autonomy will be negatively accepted by the Karabakh party. As for me, it is not so much important for me to speak about the status than about the dialogue, as I understand that the third new option may appear", - he said. 

Yunusof added that they may possibly think about setting up of the federation republic in which Karabakh will be an associated member. There will be no tragedy in it. It is senseless to argue about the Karabakh status, the discussion should be simply transferred to the constructive channel. We should start discussing the problem and looking for the new ways out of it, he said and added that in the near future Karabakh will hardly get the independence which it is striving to. It is also clear that returning of Karabakh to the status of autonomy without taking into account the results of the battle action and the established status-quo is also impossible. For this reason, we should make the Karabakh residents understand that their existence within Azerbaijan, even the nominal and declarative one, is more beneficial than outside it. And it is impossible without dialogue and contact and until the front line is available.

Yunusof thinks that Azerbaijan should undoubtedly accept Karabakh like a party to the conflict, as the present situation looks funny. Azerbaijan does not respect Karabakh and its residents. And all the contacts look like an absurd. For instance, an attempt of the meeting of the "Armenian and Azerbaijani communities of Karabakh" in Berlin. This is not serious and looks like an imitation which is inadmissible. "One must not go to Karabakh with a peace mission like out ambassador to Russia, Polad Bul-Bul ogli did, and say after returning that they should put an end to Karabakh. If you speak about the war, why did you go to Karabakh with a peace mission?", - Yunusof asked.

"As for the Madrid principles, they are good, as they delay settlement of the problem of status-quo for 10-15 years. But at the same time, these principles are abstract, as they suppose that in 10-15 years our societies will change in a fantastic way and become tolerant and ready to compromise. But this is a lie, as without democratizing of our peoples, it is not serious to hope for the Karabakh conflict settlement", - Yunusof  concluded.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.