Russia continues to pile pressure on Armenia, and after Bishkek, it is now also using its Iranian proxy

 

Russia continues to pile pressure on Armenia. It realises it is loosing the grip that it has had on the country ever since its independence in 1991. Now, Russia is also using its influence on Iran, a country that borders Armenia, to add pressure on the government of Nikol Pashinyan.

According to some Armenian media outlets Iran has demanded that security for the TRIPP project in Armenia be ensured exclusively by the Armenian Armed Forces or the armed forces of a third country already present on Armenian territory. The only such third country at the moment is Russia.

Iranian authorities fear that American forces can be deployed to protect the TRIPP route and this could result in the encirclement of Iran. Yet the deployment of US troops has never been under consideration.

The Armenian authorities have assured that the implementation of the TRIPP project will not create any challenges or threats for Iran.

This latest development follows a tense meeting between Russian president Vladimir Putin and Armenia prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan in Bishkek. The Russian president was transmiting "hot and cold" in Bishkek. With Pashinyan, the atmosphere was certainly cold.

Turkish journalist, Ilker Sezer, Managing Editor of Turkiye Today, wrote on Saturday (5 September)

Russian President Vladimir Putin was not always highly diplomatic, or Siberian-cold, in Bishkek this week. Sitting across from Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, the Russian president delivered a tense ultimatum masked as administrative advice. They had an unusual back-and-forth conversation, and it wasn't a PR video showing Putin as a strongman involving other countries’ internal affairs. 

He stated that Yerevan needs to make up its mind about its European Union membership aspirations "sooner" rather than later, adding that Moscow desperately needs "clarity" on how to proceed with the relationship. It was a reminder of the zero-sum game the Kremlin insists on playing in its immediate neighborhood.  

Yet, the same day, Putin stood next to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and the geopolitical temperature inexplicably dropped to a tepid room setting. There is no need to highlight that Türkiye is a NATO member—a defense alliance Western media claim Russia could attack by the late 2020s (and damn, we entered the late 2020s on Sept. 1, 2026)—or that its EU candidacy status endures, albeit purely on paper. 

The resulting press statement from the two leaders was a staggering display of diplomatic theater. The world is practically burning, and yet, listening to the official readouts, one might assume these two men had gathered in the Central Asian steppes solely to review the booming volume of Russian tourists visiting Antalya and to track milestones at the Akkuyu nuclear power plant. Press readouts are always dry, anyway. 

They presented a heavily curated vision of Antalya's sunny beaches and energy cooperation. But this Pollyannaish attempt to steer the narrative strictly toward shared mutual interests convinces no one. Behind closed doors, the actual agenda may have been undeniably heavy with structural, existential issues that neither leader felt comfortable airing in front of the cameras.

Back in Moscow, Russian politicians close to Putin, continue with daily tirades against Armenia, and its attempts to escape Moscow's grip.

The European Commission's evasive stance on the timing of establishing a visa-free regime with Armenia is not unexpected: Brussels traditionally demands maximum concessions from candidates, but limits itself to assurances of "brilliant prospects," Konstantin Kosachev, Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation, told the TASS news agency.

"There is certainly nothing unexpected in this position. The European Union's practice is well known: to demand maximum loyalty and concessions from its candidates for membership, in return for which it rewards them with non-binding assurances of "brilliant prospects." So, in this situation, the only unexpected thing is the unfounded confidence of the current Armenian leadership in such assurances.

And if that is not confidence, then it is an unprincipled calculation that it will be possible to play on the contradictions of other power centers competing for Armenia, besides the European Union. It will not work,” Kosachev added.

This politicial pressure comes on top of a series of economic measures that Moscow has ordered that try to stifle the Armenian economy. But Pashinyan and his government remain defiant. The governent plan for 2026-31 speaks about a balanced foreign policy. Russia's primary role in Armenia is over.

source: This analysis was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)
Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakh president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, declared September 25 a national day of mourning following the deaths of servicemen during military exercises in the Caspian Sea. Twelve Kazakh servicemen died after being swept into the Caspian Sea during the Khazar Qorgany–2026 naval exercises in the Mangystau region on Thursday (September 24). The incident occurred after weather conditions suddenly deteriorated and winds intensified during a combat training mission. In a Telegram post, the Ministry of Defence reported that 19 servicemen had been swept into the sea. So far, three have been rescued, one of whom was hospitalized, while 12 bodies have been recovered.  Search operations were continuing for the remaining four servicemen. A large-scale rescue and recovery effort has been launched, involving Kazakhstan’s Naval Forces, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, aviation assets and other relevant services.   Deputy Prime Minister Kanat Bozumbayev, who is leading a government commission at the scene, ordered a continuous, round-the-clock search for those still missing. Authorities were also instructed to provide financial and other assistance to the families of the deceased. (click image to read in full)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)