Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
Heartfelt appeal by Armenian activist. Edgar Khatchatryan addresses open letter to Presidents calling for an end to the killing on the front line.

Heartfelt appeal by Armenian activist. Edgar Khatchatryan addresses open letter to Presidents calling for an end to the killing on the front line.

3 February 2014

In a heartfelt appeal to the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, and to the international community,  a young Armenian activist has expressed his sadness at the loss of life on both sides of the conflict divide and asked for an end to the continuous bloodshed.

In his open letter, in a week that saw several young Armenian and Azerbaijani soldiers killed in hundreds of cease fire violations on the line of contact seperating Armenian and Azerbaijani forces around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, Edgar Khachatryan told the two Presidents:

"Stop blaming each other. Do not try to assure me that the bloodshed and the losses are justified and that they serve to some greater ideas. The greatest idea and value is the human life. Do not sacrifice your own citizens just to cover up your own inability in finding a diplomatic solution to the issue."

The full text of Edgar Khachtryan's open letter is reproduced here: 

 

A few hours ago I would not even think of taking this step. However, it was only a few hours ago. It was a few hours ago when I did not fully realize that I could not deal with this situation in the region anymore, when I was simply listening to the news broadcasts through local and international media regarding yet another ceasefire violation.

I would be more than happy if the international organizations supporting the governments of the countries involved in the negotiation process and the people in these countries are able to do everything possible to find a reasonable way out of the situation. I assure you that there is hardly anyone among the citizens who may think that a new war will contribute to the solution of the problem. Therefore I expect equal intolerance towards the existing situation from your side too and specific actions to prevent bloodshed in the region.

 

 

Only a few hours ago I realized that, perhaps, before I did not have the courage to voice everything that I am going say in the following letter. To be more precise, I simply realized that one day somebody has got to say the things that I am going to say now.

Now I am trying to picture what possible answers I would receive from each of you in case I would have had the chance to address my proposition to each of you personally. I am trying to formulate numerous possible responses that I may receive from you; however I understand that none of those answers can justify the deaths of the Armenian or Azerbaijani young soldiers or the losses and the firearm injury cases among the civilian population.

I am a citizen who is equally sorry for the deaths of all the soldiers. Be sure that I do not see a difference between a widowed woman, a child growing up without a father, or a parent who lost his/her child. I am sure that the pain and the grief of these people know no boundaries or nationalities.

It would be a narrow-mindedness to announce that it is an easy task to do. However, I think that when accepting the positions of the presidents, you were well aware of the difficulty and the responsibility that you were to deal with when taking on the obligations of the first person in your respective countries. Regardless of the circumstances, it is not possible to represent the interests of your own society at the same time ignoring them. Is there any country which has interest in losing its own citizens? Do you believe that the pain of the family that lost a son become bearable in case another family who is considered to be the guilty party loses a son too? We all know very well that the violence can give birth to only new, more intense and more brutal violence.

Therefore I call upon you to be consistent and do everything possible and impossible to end the ceasefire violations. For many years, from numerous platforms, you have announced that there is no alternative to the peaceful resolution of the conflict and have reassured that you are interested in finding a way of this situation through negotiation process. Well then stop the propaganda prepared for your "domestic" audience and do whatever you have promised to do.

I urge you to show political will and put an end to the continuous bloodshed and the human losses. Stop blaming each other. Do not try to assure me that the bloodshed and the losses are justified and that they serve to some greater ideas. The greatest idea and value is the human life. Do not sacrifice your own citizens just to cover up your own inability in finding a diplomatic solution to the issue.

I call upon all the societies involved in the conflict to give up the militaristic propaganda that has been spread for some political reasons and to be more demanding. Demand from the authorities to take actions in the interest of their nations! No violence and no war is in the interest of any nation.

My dream is not too idealistic and deep in my heart I cherish the hope that there will be people among both my fellow countryman and the Azerbaijani people, as well as among my colleagues or just ordinary citizens who will share my worries and will join my plea.

Edgar Khachatryan is the Director of Peace Dialogue, a member of the Global Coalition for Conflict Transformation.

The open letter is addressed to the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, the Co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, the personal representative of the OSCE CiO, as well as to all the individuals and organizations involved in the negotiation process of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

source: commonspace.eu

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
Trending

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

19 October 2026
Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit
Trending

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

31 October 2026
António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut