Armenian politicians divided over Oscanian's case. Parliament lifts immunity of former Foreign Minister amid calls for Prosecutor General's resignation.

The Armenian National Assembly yesterday voted in favor of a request from the Prosecutor General, Aghvan Hovsepyan, to lift the parliamentary immunity of former foreign minister and member of parliament from Prosperous Armenia Vartan Oskanian, in order that he may be involved as a witness in a criminal lawsuit on money laundering. The decision was taken with 64 votes for and six against. One ballot was considered invalid.

This follows a criminal case launched on May 25 following an investigation by the National Security Service into money laundering by the Civiltas Foundation which was founded by Oscanian when he left the Foreign Ministry in 2008.

The issue has split the Armenian political elite. The members of the Prosperous Armenia faction walked out of Parliament after they had spoken against the resolution to lift Oscanian's parliamentary immunity. They also called for the resignation of the Prosecutor General. Other opposition parties either voted against or boycotted the session.

The case has also attracted a lot of interest amongst foreign diplomats in Yerevan. The heads of several diplomatic missions met with Oscanian a few days ago to discuss the case.

Oscanian is seen as a potential rival for current president Serzh Sargsyan in the forthcoming presidential elections in early 2013.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Vartan Oscanian (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

There was violence and mayhem across the Pakistani Indian Ocean province of Baluchistan on Friday and Saturday (30-31 January), as separatist insurgents attacked multiple government targets, in a co-ordinated attack in a number of towns and cities. Security forces conducted a large-scale counter-terrorism operation across Baluchistan following a series of coordinated attacks targeting multiple districts, killing civilians and security personnel, according to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) of the Pakistani government. "The operation, conducted over two days, resulted in the deaths of 133 insurgents, including suicide bombers, while 15 security personnel were killed during intense engagements", according to the government source. The attacks took place in Quetta, Mastung, Nushki, Dalbandin, Kharan, Panjgur, Tump, Gwadar and Pasni. "The assaults were aimed at destabilising peace in the province and undermining development by targeting law enforcement agencies and innocent civilians", the Pakistani government said.  The Pakistani government said the attacks were launched by “Indian sponsored Fitna al Hindustan,” a reference to the separatist Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), saying intelligence reports confirmed the violence was orchestrated and directed by militant leaders operating from outside Pakistan, who were in direct communication with attackers during the assaults. The BLA also issued a statement earlier in the day, saying it had launched what it called “Operation Herof 2.0” and claiming responsibility for attacks in multiple locations. Pakistani officials describe BLA militants as Indian proxies, a charge New Delhi denies.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)