Azerbaijan hosts the 13th Session of the UN World Urban Forum

Azerbaijan is hosting the 13th session of the World Urban Forum from 17 to 22 May 2026. The World Urban Forum (WUF) was established by the United Nations in 2001 to address one of the world’s most pressing challenges: rapid urbanization and its far-reaching effects on communities, cities, economies, climate change, and public policy. 

Anacláudia Rossbach, Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) says: “At the Forum, we will address crucial challenges, such as housing, land use, urban planning, governance and participation. We will listen to diverse stakeholders and tackle key issues: how to ensure affordable housing for all, transform informal settlements, recover and rebuild, and enhance climate resilience. We need to build strong coalitions for better solutions to challenges posed by the global housing crisis."

This year’s WUF is themed “Housing the World: Safe and Resilient Cities and Communities” and the Azerbaijani hosts are focusing on how housing intersects with climate change, social equity, economic development, and crisis recovery. The theme is central and brings attention to climate change, a transboundary challenge that is currently being sidelined from most political agendas due to conflicts, militarisation, and the rise in far-right politics. 

The event itself was directly affected by the very issue it sought to address; Baku experienced severe rainfall that flooded streets, homes, and even the conference venue. In a video reported by OC Media, participants were seen crossing the water, holding their shoes in their hands, and with their pants rolled up. Despite this unfortunate event, the forum brought together over 40,000 people from around 182 countries to discuss the different issues.

While the WUF does not produce legally binding decisions, the forum seeks to provide a platform for policy dialogue. This year’s forum particularly focused on the world housing crisis, boldly asking participants, “The global housing crisis: what is the plan?” While building more may seem to be a quick fix, the panel encouraged countries to plan for sustainable urban development and cooperation with both the scientific community and the local civil society. 

In his opening speech, the Azerbaijani President, Mr. Aliyev, stated that “in many parts of Azerbaijan, urban development is progressing very rapidly, and definitely this important gathering and the expertise of our friends from the United Nations and numerous guests who visit us will help all of us to learn more, to learn from each other, to learn from positive experiences, and also to talk about our mistakes.”

While the forum is not expected to reach major policy recommendations, it brings attention to climate resilience and, importantly, to shared international experience. This is a point that should be explored further, particularly when it comes to the South Caucasus. All three countries are affected by pollution, water scarcity, extreme heat, and extreme rainfall. Georgia’s Black Sea coastline, an area crucial for trade, faces significant risks from rising sea levels. By contrast, the Caspian Sea is retreating, posing threats to coastal infrastructure, food security, and local livelihoods. The countries also share two transboundary rivers, the Kura and the Aras, both of which face severe pollution.

While the region is affected in different ways by climate change, there are no regional strategies to manage water resources, share information, or coordinate responses. During the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, this lack of coordination was understandable; however, now, it seems like a missed opportunity. 

LINKS Europe, in November 2025, published a report written by Armenian and Azerbaijani experts that addressed environmental peace-building. The report proposed different areas of cooperation when it comes to shared environmental problems. These ideas shared in the report were not abstract but rooted in local knowledge and pragmatism. Armenia and Azerbaijan are taking significant steps towards institutionalising peace, and these developments should not be underestimated. However, a common regional strategy that addresses climate change in the South Caucasus is one area that cannot be afforded to be overlooked. 

Source: This briefing was prepared by the editorial team of Commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)