Bulgaria’s April 2026 election saw a sweeping win for ex-President Rumen Radev’s Progressive Bulgaria party. While much international coverage focused on Radev’s perceived stance toward Russia, the more consequential story lies at home: his victory was shaped by youth-driven discontent that intensified after the collapse of the government led by Zhelyazkov in December 2025. Young Bulgarians, particularly those in Generation Z, turned out in significant numbers, alongside previously disengaged voters. Their mobilisation appears to have been driven less by ideology than by frustration with entrenched corruption, weak economic prospects, and a broader sense that Bulgaria has struggled to offer a viable future for its younger generation. This week, Thursday Interview returns with Dimitar Borumov, a 23-year-old Bulgarian political economist, teacher of Bulgarian history, geography, and economy, and columnist at The European Times. We discuss the surge in youth participation, the frustrations and divides behind it, and how social media is shaping political news consumption among young Bulgarians. “Young people were already taking to the streets in December 2025. That was a clear indicator that they wanted change. They wanted to change what I would call, cynically, the ‘rotten system’, the status quo they were tired of. What Radev proposed was not a specific policy, apart from judicial reform. It was not directed against a specific party or person. It was a broader alternative, framed around a stronger Bulgaria.” (Read the full interview by clicking on the image above.)

There appears to have been a shift in the calculus of the war, though it is not entirely clear whether it amounts to a turning point or merely a pause. Writing for Al Arabiya, political analyst Raghida Dergham observed that both Washington and Tehran appear to be buying time, studying strategic and tactical mistakes, repositioning militarily and politically, and seeking what she called “a warrior's pause”. Neither side emerged from the first round with a decisive outcome: Tehran's regime appears to remain intact, and Trump's objectives remain unmet. What is new, and what has been described as both intriguing and alarming, is that Trump briefly spoke of a US-Iranian partnership in generating revenue via the Strait of Hormuz before walking back on the idea due to pressure from European and Gulf allies. The remark, however fleeting, signals the unpredictability of the situation; a White House moving between maximum pressure and maximum uncertainty, with allies left to scrape for interpretation. Reminiscent of this fact, negotiations in Islamabad seem to have stalled, and Trump's decision to impose a blockade on Iran’s maritime trade has only further disrupted the landscape, even as Iran threatens to retaliate by targeting Gulf ports directly. (To read the full briefing, click on the image above.)

There appears to have been a shift in the calculus of the war, though it is not entirely clear whether it amounts to a turning point or merely a pause. Writing for Al Arabiya, political analyst Raghida Dergham observed that both Washington and Tehran appear to be buying time, studying strategic and tactical mistakes, repositioning militarily and politically, and seeking what she called “a warrior's pause”. Neither side emerged from the first round with a decisive outcome: Tehran's regime appears to remain intact, and Trump's objectives remain unmet. What is new, and what has been described as both intriguing and alarming, is that Trump briefly spoke of a US-Iranian partnership in generating revenue via the Strait of Hormuz before walking back on the idea due to pressure from European and Gulf allies. The remark, however fleeting, signals the unpredictability of the situation; a White House moving between maximum pressure and maximum uncertainty, with allies left to scrape for interpretation. Reminiscent of this fact, negotiations in Islamabad seem to have stalled, and Trump's decision to impose a blockade on Iran’s maritime trade has only further disrupted the landscape, even as Iran threatens to retaliate by targeting Gulf ports directly. (To read the full briefing, click on the image above.)