White House dismisses media reports of security guarantees for land swaps

On 27 January, the White House dismissed Financial Times reports claiming that the Trump administration had indicated to Ukraine that US security guarantees would be contingent on Kyiv first agreeing to a peace deal. Such a deal would likely have involved ceding the Donbas region to Russia.

White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly responded to the reports, stating:

"This is totally false – the US's only role in the peacemaking process is to bring both sides together to make a deal. It's a shame that the Financial Times is letting malicious actors lie anonymously in order to muck up the peace process, which is in a great place after this weekend's historic trilateral meeting in Abu Dhabi," Kelly said.

A source familiar with the US position told the Financial Times that Washington "was not trying to force any territorial concessions upon Ukraine". The source added that US security guarantees depend on the willingness of both sides to reach a peace agreement, while the content of such an agreement depends solely on Russia and Ukraine.

Source: commonspace.eu with European Pravda, citing comments by White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly to the Financial Times 

 

 

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)