Türkiye, Azerbaijan and Georgia sign Istanbul Declaration

The foreign ministers of Türkiye, Azerbaijan and Georgia met in Istanbul on Monday (8 June) for the tenth trilateral meeting of the three countries, signing the Istanbul Declaration and reaffirming their commitment to regional cooperation, connectivity and stability in the South Caucasus.

Hosted by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, the meeting brought together Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov and Georgian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Maka Botchorishvili. The three ministers used the meeting to review ongoing cooperation across politics, trade, transport, energy, security, culture and technology, while also addressing the wider geopolitical pressures affecting the region.

In their statements, the ministers presented the trilateral mechanism as one of the most successful formats of regional cooperation in the South Caucasus. Fidan said the platform had become a “consultation ground” that produces results and builds trust, noting that it had supported cooperation for almost 14 years. He added that Türkiye sees the mechanism as one of the guarantees of peace, stability and sustainable prosperity in the region.

Connectivity and energy security formed the centre of the discussions. The ministers highlighted the growing importance of the Middle Corridor as a route linking Europe and Asia, especially at a time of disrupted supply chains and regional instability. They also welcomed the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway reaching full capacity, describing it as a key component of the wider East-West transport network.

Energy cooperation was also emphasised as a pillar of the trilateral partnership. The ministers pointed to the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum project and the Southern Gas Corridor as examples of infrastructure that has strengthened both regional economies and European energy security. They also discussed the development of green energy corridors and the potential for further cooperation in renewable energy, technology, agriculture and innovation.

The ministers also addressed the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process. Türkiye and Georgia both welcomed the positive dynamics between Baku and Yerevan, while Fidan said Türkiye continued its normalisation process with Armenia in close coordination with Azerbaijan. The speakers framed peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan as a major opportunity for the South Caucasus, arguing that stronger connectivity could help reinforce the social and economic basis of peace.

At the same time, the ministers warned that the region remains exposed to wider security risks, including the Russia-Ukraine war, tensions around Iran, conflict in the Middle East, cyber threats, organised crime and hybrid warfare. They stressed that diplomatic and political channels should be prioritised, international law respected, and ceasefires transformed into lasting peace.

Georgia’s foreign minister also reiterated that Russia’s occupation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia remains a security challenge for Georgia and the wider region, thanking Türkiye and Azerbaijan for their support for Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

The Istanbul Declaration reaffirmed the three countries’ support for each other’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and internationally recognised borders, while setting out plans to deepen cooperation in trade, investment, transport, energy, security, climate action and people-to-people links. The declaration describes the Middle Corridor, the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline and the Southern Gas Corridor as key to regional connectivity and European energy security. They agreed to strengthen cooperation against terrorism, organised crime, cybercrime and hybrid threats, and confirmed that the next trilateral foreign ministers’ meeting will be held in Georgia in 2027.

Source: commonspace.eu with Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)